Kaizen Kaizen (aka Kaizen_1) - The Relentless Improvement Machine
Meet Kaizen Kaizen, a chess player whose name boldly declares the philosophy of continuous improvement—because why settle for good when you can always be better? Although their rating history reads like a thrilling rollercoaster from the low 700s all the way up to peaks surpassing 1400 in Rapid, Kaizen’s dedication to the game is as unwavering as their username.
Specializing mainly in Blitz and Rapid formats, Kaizen has battled through thousands of games, demonstrating a stubborn tenacity that even the most seasoned grandmasters would respect. With over 1800 wins and just a fraction shy of 2000 losses in Blitz alone, Kaizen isn’t afraid to learn from every move (especially the wrong ones). Interestingly, their endgame frequency sits at a solid 51.55%, proving Kaizen is no stranger to the grind down to the wire—most games last around 50 moves for a win and even longer when the tides turn against them.
When it comes to openings, Kaizen_1 marches to their own mysterious drum, favoring the “Unknown Opening” with nearly 4000 Blitz games under that banner, boasting a respectable 45.6% win rate. However, don’t expect a classical repertoire repeated ad nauseam—mixing in an intriguingly named “Top Secret” opening and dabbling in Bishops and Italian Games, our player embraces unpredictability as a strategic weapon.
Ever the pragmatic combatant, Kaizen understands the value of resilience: after a piece loss, the comeback rate approaches a heroic 76%. And if the psychological stakes rise? Beware—a tilt factor of 11 hints at those rare moments when even Kaizen’s zen is tested by the treacherous battlefield of 64 squares.
One of Kaizen’s most recent triumphs was a crafty victory using the Bishop’s Opening against “noelitro,” sealing the deal with a resignation after a fierce 32-move tussle. Chess.com’s spectators were treated to a tactical feast as Kaizen calmly dismantled the opponent’s defenses, demonstrating why persistence coupled with strategy wins the day.
Fun fact: Despite the serious nature of chess, Kaizen’s playing hours peak around noon, confirming that even grandmasters prefer their caffeine fix before delivering checkmate.
In summary, Kaizen Kaizen is a study in the power of perseverance with a dash of mystery. Somewhere between “just okay” and “chess superstar,” they’re a reminder that improvement isn’t a destination, but a lifelong, and often amusing, journey. One can only imagine the next surprise move this player will cook up—because if their name tells us anything, it’s that the game is never truly over.
What you’re doing well in rapid games
You show willingness to engage in sharp, tactical play and to fight for initiative from the early moves. Your openness to mixed lines and your ability to press when you have active pieces are strengths you can build on in fast time controls.
- You often develop pieces quickly and create practical chances in the opening phase, which helps you stay active even when the position is complex.
- Your willingness to complicate positions can pressure opponents and induce mistakes in faster time controls.
- You have shown resilience in dynamic games, keeping fighting chances even when the opponent has the initiative.
What to improve to raise your results
- Time management and pace: In rapid games, allocating your time wisely is crucial. Try to buy a tempo in the first 15 moves and avoid long, uncertain sequences which leave you with little time to finish the game cleanly.
- Opening discipline and repertoire: Your openings show some solid lines, but you can reduce risk by narrowing the initial choices to 2–3 dependable setups. This helps you reach your plans faster and reduces early inaccuracies.
- Endgame conversion: When the position simplifies, convert advantages more cleanly and look for practical methods to simplify to favorable pawn structures or activity for your pieces.
- Decision quality under pressure: In fast games, small missteps accumulate. After each game, identify one moment where a simpler plan or a safer move would have maintained a clear advantage, and practice that exact decision type in drills.
- Piece coordination in transitions: Work on coordinating your minor pieces with your rooks and queen, especially when the board is crowded. Better coordination often leads to quicker, safer gains of space or material.
Concrete, short-term improvement plan (4 weeks)
- Opening refinement (2 openings): Choose 2 openings you already play and study a compact plan for each (what to develop, where to place the king, and typical middle-game plans). Document a one-page, move-by-move plan for the first 8–10 moves. See Italian Game and Kings Gambit Accepted style ideas as examples, and consider Italian Game for a quick refresher.
- Daily tactical practice (20 minutes): Focus on 10–15 quick tactics puzzles, prioritizing patterns that occur in the openings you’re studying. This strengthens calculation and speed.
- Endgame drills (15 minutes, 3–4 times per week): Practice king and pawn endings and simple rook endgames to improve conversion after simplifications.
- Post-game reflection (immediate after each rapid game): Write 3 bullets — one thing you did well, one mistake to avoid next time, and one alternative safe plan you could have chosen in a key moment.
Openings to lean into (data-informed)
Some openings show relatively strong performance, but it’s important to balance breadth with depth. Consider prioritizing these two as your core repertoire, then expanding as you gain confidence:
- Beef up the Bishop’s Opening: 3.d3 started lines show a solid win rate in your data. Focus on developing a simple, reliable plan from that structure.
- Keep a practical, sharp option like the Blackburne Shilling Gambit family when appropriate, but only with a prepared response to common defenses to avoid getting out of your comfort zone in the first dozen moves.
- Limit highly unorthodox lines in lower-stakes rapid games until your comfort with the resulting positions improves.
You can review more openings notes in your openings performance summary and map out concrete lines to study for the next 2–3 weeks. Italian Game can serve as a quick placeholder reference for a standard development plan.
Progress indicators to watch
Short-term goals to validate your plan:
- Consistently reach the middle game with at least a comfortable time cushion in 70% of your rapid games.
- Maintain or improve your performance in the two core openings you choose to study.
- Increase the rate of clean endgame conversions, reducing the number of hard-to-lose positions.
Notes and placeholders
To keep things actionable, you can insert quick notes after each game review. For deeper study, you can reference openings with internal notes such as the Italian Game placeholder above: Italian Game. If you’d like, I can tailor the plan further by tagging individual games from your recent rapid results and extracting a focused improvement point from each.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| abboos4 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| pafjimenez | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| 5ringschess | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| cosimaximus | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| wados_76 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| toma_sh | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| pedroflorido | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| charley73 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| great_white | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| aneeeh | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Camelia-Adriana Ciobanu | 10W / 35L / 162D | |
| gaji07 | 2W / 7L / 0D | |
| ankitdoshi2011 | 3W / 3L / 0D | |
| andreasmagnusson2 | 3W / 1L / 0D | |
| kdaifoti | 0W / 4L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1311 | |||
| 2024 | 885 | 1220 | ||
| 2023 | 1101 | 1045 | ||
| 2022 | 1290 | |||
| 2021 | 1270 | 1221 | ||
| 2020 | 1270 | 1225 | ||
| 2019 | 590 | 1140 | 1433 | |
| 2018 | 1139 | |||
| 2017 | 1169 | 1174 | ||
| 2016 | 1199 | 1011 | ||
| 2015 | 772 | 982 | 1174 | |
| 2014 | 573 | 732 | 1343 | |
| 2013 | 1189 | |||
| 2010 | 1047 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 251W / 264L / 19D | 274W / 249L / 10D | 56.6 |
| 2024 | 345W / 326L / 12D | 327W / 331L / 22D | 54.5 |
| 2023 | 140W / 151L / 7D | 132W / 153L / 11D | 52.6 |
| 2022 | 253W / 253L / 16D | 262W / 259L / 13D | 49.6 |
| 2021 | 314W / 306L / 24D | 312W / 319L / 25D | 52.2 |
| 2020 | 234W / 253L / 47D | 248W / 240L / 42D | 52.8 |
| 2019 | 195W / 211L / 48D | 175W / 224L / 53D | 52.7 |
| 2018 | 201W / 222L / 12D | 189W / 240L / 16D | 56.4 |
| 2017 | 314W / 351L / 21D | 312W / 371L / 17D | 55.5 |
| 2016 | 70W / 50L / 5D | 69W / 52L / 6D | 55.0 |
| 2015 | 1W / 5L / 0D | 2W / 3L / 0D | 39.2 |
| 2014 | 13W / 16L / 2D | 9W / 22L / 1D | 39.7 |
| 2013 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 13.0 |
| 2010 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 12.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 626 | 329 | 277 | 20 | 52.6% |
| Australian Defense | 432 | 206 | 212 | 14 | 47.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 310 | 141 | 156 | 13 | 45.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 278 | 134 | 132 | 12 | 48.2% |
| Philidor Defense | 271 | 133 | 133 | 5 | 49.1% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 254 | 111 | 134 | 9 | 43.7% |
| Scotch Game | 238 | 108 | 124 | 6 | 45.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 204 | 76 | 113 | 15 | 37.2% |
| Petrov's Defense | 171 | 75 | 91 | 5 | 43.9% |
| Bishop's Opening: 3.d3 | 156 | 91 | 62 | 3 | 58.3% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 682 | 347 | 318 | 17 | 50.9% |
| Philidor Defense | 242 | 127 | 105 | 10 | 52.5% |
| Australian Defense | 219 | 102 | 111 | 6 | 46.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 166 | 70 | 88 | 8 | 42.2% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 163 | 84 | 76 | 3 | 51.5% |
| Scotch Game | 153 | 69 | 77 | 7 | 45.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 149 | 58 | 80 | 11 | 38.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 141 | 61 | 75 | 5 | 43.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 117 | 50 | 59 | 8 | 42.7% |
| Elephant Gambit | 97 | 54 | 40 | 3 | 55.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 1 |