Olivier Kenta - International Master
Born with a curious mind and an insatiable love for chess, Olivier Kenta, known online as kenta1234, carved their niche in the chess world by earning the prestigious title of International Master from FIDE. This title isn't just handed out like candy, but Olivier’s tactical prowess and resilience on the board ensured they claimed it with style.
Kenta’s journey is nothing short of a rollercoaster ride. Starting from humble beginnings around 2013 with daily ratings hovering just above 1000, they skyrocketed to a peak daily rating above 2000 by 2021. But don’t be fooled—this player’s real magic shines in faster-paced games! Blitz and Bullet are where Olivier truly dazzles with eye-popping peak blitz ratings nearing 2900 and bullet ratings flirting with 2900 as well.
Their blitz battles could easily be mistaken for chess on caffeine—rapid, razor-sharp moves and a win rate that leaves many scrambling. Over nearly 10,000 blitz games played, Kenta boasts a win rate exceeding 54% and a bullet success rate close to 60%. When it comes to tricky openings, "Top Secret" strategies aren’t just a clever name—they reflect Kenta’s penchant for keeping rivals guessing and fans intrigued.
Olivier is also a comeback artist. With a staggering 88.6% comeback rate and winning over 96% of games after losing a piece, Kenta refuses to let adversity decide the game's outcome. Expect a stubborn fight and perhaps a few hair-raising bluffs before you take them down.
Off the board, Olivier’s psychological tilt factor hovers at 68—proof that even masters get a little flustered, but that never stops them from climbing right back into the fray stronger than before.
Whether grinding out endgames that last an average of 80+ moves or closing out with grace, Kenta combines patience with ferocity. And as if their chess skills weren’t enough, their humor and sportsmanship make them a beloved figure among their community of thousands of opponents — especially those “manusutha” players who might want a rematch!
All in all, Olivier Kenta is a formidable strategist, an online blitz warrior, and a true international master of the 64 squares. Just don’t blink—you might miss the winning move!
Constructive Feedback for Olivier “kenta1234”
1. Strengths to Keep Nurturing
- Flexible opening repertoire. In your most-recent win against Jojogwene you showed how smoothly you can transpose from a Réti set-up into a King’s Indian Attack structure. You handled the pawn breaks (11.c4 & 12.cxd5) with excellent timing.
- Piece activity over material. Moves such as 26.Ne5! and 28.Nd7! in the same game illustrate a good eye for activity, even when it costs a pawn.
- Conversion technique. After 30…Kg7 you calmly improved every piece and pushed the queenside majority until Black had to resign. That “ladder” approach—fix, improve, push—works very well for you.
2. Recurring Issues & Action Plans
a. Over-expanded queenside in the Réti/English
In the loss to Alexey Kislinsky you played the typical 10.Rb1 & 11.cxb5 idea, but b3–b4 arrived too late to justify the space gain. Once the a6–b5–Ba6 battery appeared, your queen was forced into passive defence and the counter-play on the light squares evaporated.
- Drill: Put the following position on a board: after 10…b5. Practise three defensive set-ups (A) a4, (B) e4 break, (C) Nd2–f1–e3 regroup, and note how each influences Black’s queenside assault.
- Reference game: Carlsen-Caruana, Wijk aan Zee 2020, where White meets …b5 with an immediate a4.
b. Kingside dark-square weaknesses in the Modern/King’s Indian structures
Several February losses (e.g. vs blefer66 and Statham) followed the pattern …g6/…Bg7 ➜ …c5/…d5 ➜ …f5 with the h6–g6–f5 complex falling apart. Once White’s knight landed on f4/f5 the dark squares crumbled.
- Concept to review: Exchange sacrifice …Rxf3 and related ideas; they often save Black’s structure when the Bg7 is under fire.
- Training: Load 25 rapid puzzles that start with a
dark-square crisis
in the Modern/King’s Indian and look for preventive resources (…Kh7, …Nh7-g5, or the early …e5).
c. Time-management in 3-minute games
Even when positions were equal you often had <40 s versus >1 min for the opponent (see moves 30-40 of the Alexchess1984 game). Because your technique is good, the best “rating gain” per hour probably lies in shaving 10-15 s off the opening phase.
- Prepare a 30-move “autopilot” repertoire for both colours: lines you trust and can play almost on sight. This avoids burning time on familiar positions.
- Practise “increment blitz”: 3 + 2 helps develop the habit of banking time whenever the move is obvious.
3. Concrete Study Menu (Next 2 Weeks)
- Day 1-3: Analyse the loss vs Alexchess1984 with an engine, but stop it after depth 20 and write down
human
plans first. - Day 4-6: 30 tactical puzzles/day filtered for motifs deflection and back-rank mate. You missed Rg2+ ideas twice in February—let’s patch that.
- Day 7-10: Endgame flashcards—rook vs passed pawn (your win vs Riley could have simplified sooner with 34.Rf3! instead of 34…Rdxd7).
- Day 11-14: Play ten 10 + 0 games focusing on Modern Defence as Black but delay …g6 until move 3-4; compare results.
4. Motivation Board
Your current personal records:
- Peak blitz rating: 2901 (2024-11-28)
- Peak rapid rating: 2434 (2021-05-16)
5. Final Encouragement
You are already converting small advantages with impressive consistency. If you tighten the early move-ordering in your favourite openings and save 15-20 seconds per game, breaking the next rating barrier is realistic within a month. Keep the curiosity alive—every loss in February contained a future lesson you can turn into a win!
Good luck at the board, and feel free to send me any game for a deeper dive.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Rustemov | 2W / 10L / 8D | |
| AmericanPatzer3 | 4W / 4L / 0D | |
| ayina29 | 3W / 3L / 3D | |
| chess_286 | 4W / 0L / 0D | |
| Roman Pyrih | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| Roman Yankovsky | 1W / 2L / 1D | |
| Erikogas | 12W / 9L / 3D | |
| vibhu11 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| playtowin2020 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| jaguar-warrior | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| descennd | 123W / 45L / 10D | |
| themagnet | 9W / 59L / 36D | |
| Eric Kurtz | 47W / 14L / 6D | |
| Mark Plotkin | 20W / 29L / 6D | |
| guaruwarrior | 36W / 11L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2904 | 1662 | ||
| 2024 | 2839 | 2784 | 1551 | |
| 2023 | 2822 | 2684 | 1578 | |
| 2022 | 2690 | 2008 | ||
| 2021 | 2618 | 2691 | 2414 | 2007 |
| 2020 | 2638 | 2702 | 2276 | |
| 2019 | 2494 | 2526 | ||
| 2018 | 2474 | 2576 | ||
| 2017 | 2486 | 2043 | ||
| 2016 | 2230 | 1844 | ||
| 2015 | 2319 | 2155 | 2000 | |
| 2014 | 2265 | 2186 | 1200 | |
| 2013 | 1640 | 2169 | 1011 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 126W / 80L / 29D | 120W / 89L / 31D | 86.9 |
| 2024 | 433W / 216L / 69D | 340W / 297L / 79D | 94.9 |
| 2023 | 488W / 297L / 111D | 437W / 346L / 102D | 90.3 |
| 2022 | 208W / 108L / 34D | 164W / 140L / 43D | 89.3 |
| 2021 | 288W / 172L / 48D | 269W / 179L / 32D | 84.8 |
| 2020 | 353W / 220L / 51D | 311W / 262L / 46D | 80.2 |
| 2019 | 432W / 267L / 42D | 394W / 280L / 53D | 77.3 |
| 2018 | 179W / 116L / 12D | 182W / 100L / 22D | 83.9 |
| 2017 | 38W / 16L / 1D | 47W / 28L / 0D | 19.1 |
| 2016 | 1W / 4L / 0D | 2W / 10L / 3D | 102.7 |
| 2015 | 50W / 22L / 10D | 39W / 38L / 10D | 89.1 |
| 2014 | 89W / 36L / 11D | 82W / 42L / 19D | 87.0 |
| 2013 | 82W / 12L / 2D | 73W / 22L / 1D | 74.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 353 | 200 | 151 | 2 | 56.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 338 | 168 | 133 | 37 | 49.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 250 | 143 | 83 | 24 | 57.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 217 | 123 | 72 | 22 | 56.7% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 213 | 114 | 74 | 25 | 53.5% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 198 | 110 | 67 | 21 | 55.6% |
| Döry Defense | 180 | 99 | 61 | 20 | 55.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 176 | 93 | 70 | 13 | 52.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 156 | 82 | 56 | 18 | 52.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 129 | 69 | 48 | 12 | 53.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Unknown Opening* | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 186 | 107 | 68 | 11 | 57.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 89 | 53 | 30 | 6 | 59.5% |
| King's Indian Attack | 78 | 52 | 21 | 5 | 66.7% |
| Döry Defense | 57 | 35 | 19 | 3 | 61.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 53 | 29 | 20 | 4 | 54.7% |
| Australian Defense | 52 | 28 | 22 | 2 | 53.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 49 | 30 | 14 | 5 | 61.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 48 | 26 | 20 | 2 | 54.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 43 | 23 | 12 | 8 | 53.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 42 | 24 | 13 | 5 | 57.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 10 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Gipslis Variation | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 20.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 31 | 2 |
| Losing | 68 | 0 |