Chess Player Profile: keyword
Meet keyword, a chess aficionado who has transformed the 64 squares into a battleground of wit, will, and occasional whimsy. Rising through the ranks since 2009, keyword has mastered the art of blitz chess, boasting a peak rating of 2316 as of February 2025—a score that hints at serious skills and an even more serious passion for quick, adrenaline-packed games.
While their bullet and rapid ratings may not steal the show, keyword's blitz prowess keeps opponents on their toes. Their favorite opening weapon? The Scandinavian Defense Closed, wielded with a win rate of just over 50%. Not to be outdone, they dabble with the Queen’s Pawn and Nimzowitsch Defenses, revealing a taste for strategic complexity.
Keyword's journey has seen exhilarating peaks and encountering some tricky valleys—long losing streaks and some brutal checkmates—but that never dims their fighting spirit. Their longest winning streak stands at a solid 16 games (take that, Murphy's Law!), and their tactical awareness boasts a remarkable 87.85% comeback rate. Apparently, losing a piece just lights a fire under their strategy, with a near 42% win rate following such setbacks.
A seasoned endgame expert, keyword thrives in the late stages, with nearly 75% endgame frequency—probably because they love to "check" their opponents one last time before claiming victory. Watching their games unfold during the best window of 2 PM might just be the secret sauce to understanding their peak performance.
Playing Style and Psychology
With an early resignation rate of less than 1%, keyword's resilience is tougher than a Siberian defense, refusing to throw in the towel prematurely. Their average moves per win hover around 66, showcasing patience, while losses tend to drag longer at roughly 75 moves—perhaps the sign of a stubborn heart refusing to quit.
Like any mortal human, keyword admits a tilt factor of 27—because even grandmasters occasionally spill coffee on their lucky chessboard. However, their rated vs casual win difference is a modest 2.45%, proving that underdogs beware—the serious games bring out their inner beast.
Notable Recent Battles
Keyword recently secured victories against some tough opponents like Ercae11, wyett, and Richelieu91, dominating with clever mid-game tactics and a sharp knight invasion.
One particularly memorable win was a brutal display of board control ending in a resignation at move 16, featuring the Closed Sicilian Defense.
On the flip side, they've also suffered resignations to formidable foes like syah68 and Richelieu91 in games where the queens danced dangerously and defensive walls crumbled.
Quirks & Fun Facts
- Chess openings are serious business, but keyword seems to have a charming fondness for the always flashy Closed Sicilian and Nimzowitsch variations – a subtle nod to style over pure brute force.
- Despite an intimidating record, our player keeps a playful edge, as evident in a blitz rating history that reads like a rollercoaster: the highs of 2300+ peaks and the lows that would make a rook look dizzy.
- Tactical resilience? Check. Patience? Double-check. A flair for drama? Almost certainly – after all, how else to explain the fascination with sacrificing a piece for the sweet taste of that comeback victory?
- Keyword’s games are a masterclass in persistence, proving that on the chessboard, as in life, the knight always finds a way.
Whether you’re a casual spectator or a fellow chess addict, keyword’s profile offers a lesson: in chess, as in comedy, timing and a little daring can turn the tides. So brace yourself for clever moves, witty traps, and the occasional facepalm – because with keyword, the game is never boring.
Quick summary
Nice run — you converted several sharp kingside attacks and won a few messy, tactical games. Your recent wins show a taste for double-edged play (opposite-side castling, pawn storms) and good pattern recognition in the tactical melee. The losses highlight a few recurring issues: counterplay left unchecked, and trouble converting or defending in endgames/quiet positions.
What you did well (repeat these)
- Active piece play in attack — you consistently bring knights and rooks into the fight quickly (examples: sacrificial Nxe6 and the g-pawn storm in your win vs pdleal1983).
- Playing with initiative — when you open lines toward the enemy king you follow up accurately and keep pressure instead of giving your opponent easy breathing room.
- Opening choice and familiarity — you play lines that lead to practical, unbalanced positions (the Scandinavian Defense structures and related pawn storms) and your win rate there is strong.
- Clock awareness — you force complications that sometimes win on time; you create practical problems for the opponent under blitz pressure.
Here’s a replayable excerpt of the attack that worked well recently:
Recurring weaknesses to fix
- King safety after opposite-side castling — you generate strong attacks, but sometimes allow counterplay on open files (watch the opponent’s rook and queen activity before launching the final pawn push).
- Handling passed pawns and promotion threats — in your loss vs viktornovus you were overwhelmed by a passed pawn and mating threats; practice defending and blockading passed pawns with pieces rather than chasing material.
- Transitioning to the endgame — several games show you trading into endgames where the opponent’s connected passed pawns or better piece coordination decide the game. Improve technique in queen/rook vs pawn endgames and in handling outside passed pawns.
- Over-reliance on practical flagging — winning on time is a skill, but aim to reduce games that only end because the opponent flagged; make your wins cleaner so they don’t depend on the clock.
Concrete training plan (4-week cycle)
- Week 1 — Tactics & speed: 30 minutes daily of mixed-motif puzzles (forks/pins/discoveries). Emphasize calculation to mate and winning material in 2–4 move combos.
- Week 2 — Endgames: 3 drills (rook vs pawn, queen vs pawn, basic king+rook vs king). Practice converting with a tempo advantage and defending a lone king from passed pawns.
- Week 3 — Opening + typical middlegames: study 2 main lines of your preferred Scandinavian/related set-ups. Review typical breaks and how to neutralize your opponent’s counterplay before launching pawn storms. Use Scandinavian Defense to label your study.
- Week 4 — Practical blitz work + review: play 10 blitz games with focus (one goal per game: e.g., “avoid allowing doubled rooks” or “don’t go all-in if opponent can trade queens”). After each session, review the worst 3 games for recurring mistakes (10–15 minutes each).
Immediate checklist before your next blitz session
- Is my king safe if I castle long? If not, postpone the pawn storm.
- Before sacrificing, count checks and captures and ensure there is no easy perpetual or decisive counter-attack on an open file.
- If you get a passed pawn in the endgame, centralize your king and use rooks behind the pawn or blockade with knights/bishops.
- Keep an eye on time — if you can, practice a control with small increment to avoid games decided purely by flagging.
Small technical tips
- When attacking with pawns (g/h/f pushes), ensure a minor piece or rook controls escape squares — don't push blindly.
- Swap queens only when the resulting king safety and pawn structure are clearly better for you.
- In positions with opposite-side castling, always ask: “Where is the enemy counterplay?” and neutralize it first.
Follow-up & resources
If you want, I can:
- Annotate 2 of your recent games move-by-move (one win, one loss) with concrete improvements — tell me which two and I’ll return a short annotated PGN.
- Build a 30-minute blitz warm-up routine based on the weaknesses above.
Useful study anchors: tactical drills, basic rook endgames, and a short Scandinavian primer. If you’d like I can link an example line from your win to a typical Scandinavian Defense idea or create a short practice set.
One final encouragement
Your recent form shows steady improvement (positive rating trends and a ~50% strength-adjusted win rate). Keep sharpening tactics and endgame technique and you’ll turn many of those close, messy wins into clean, repeatable victories.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| chesswastetime | 71W / 98L / 6D | View Games |
| snookie_p | 57W / 64L / 5D | View Games |
| climatecrisis | 44W / 74L / 3D | View Games |
| hulk999 | 48W / 66L / 2D | View Games |
| badudesky | 18W / 56L / 6D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2288 | |||
| 2024 | 2211 | |||
| 2023 | 2114 | |||
| 2022 | 2105 | |||
| 2021 | 2084 | 2030 | ||
| 2020 | 2055 | 1962 | ||
| 2019 | 2102 | |||
| 2018 | 1989 | |||
| 2017 | 1487 | 1973 | ||
| 2016 | 1972 | |||
| 2015 | 1885 | |||
| 2014 | 1879 | |||
| 2013 | 1487 | 1722 | ||
| 2012 | 1723 | |||
| 2011 | 1556 | 1610 | 1319 | |
| 2010 | 785 | 1574 | 1038 | |
| 2009 | 1110 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1344W / 1477L / 99D | 1273W / 1507L / 115D | 73.3 |
| 2024 | 1197W / 1412L / 72D | 1173W / 1427L / 87D | 73.9 |
| 2023 | 1203W / 1419L / 98D | 1167W / 1488L / 84D | 74.8 |
| 2022 | 1294W / 1578L / 125D | 1296W / 1659L / 100D | 74.4 |
| 2021 | 1506W / 1456L / 105D | 1348W / 1607L / 94D | 75.1 |
| 2020 | 1670W / 1549L / 135D | 1502W / 1796L / 125D | 74.3 |
| 2019 | 790W / 725L / 53D | 702W / 830L / 53D | 71.1 |
| 2018 | 839W / 779L / 43D | 812W / 830L / 44D | 71.7 |
| 2017 | 1225W / 1086L / 88D | 1096W / 1217L / 72D | 72.2 |
| 2016 | 1152W / 1024L / 69D | 1050W / 1127L / 81D | 71.1 |
| 2015 | 1161W / 1018L / 86D | 1025W / 1134L / 94D | 71.6 |
| 2014 | 1419W / 1443L / 109D | 1362W / 1552L / 95D | 72.7 |
| 2013 | 1083W / 1237L / 81D | 1042W / 1284L / 79D | 70.3 |
| 2012 | 1170W / 1533L / 84D | 1180W / 1530L / 67D | 71.6 |
| 2011 | 1578W / 2386L / 127D | 1558W / 2456L / 99D | 68.3 |
| 2010 | 1279W / 1875L / 125D | 1178W / 2078L / 103D | 67.4 |
| 2009 | 0W / 0L / 1D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 11.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 11836 | 5383 | 6079 | 374 | 45.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 9556 | 4044 | 5248 | 264 | 42.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 9287 | 4672 | 4316 | 299 | 50.3% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 4205 | 1909 | 2144 | 152 | 45.4% |
| Czech Defense | 4100 | 2005 | 1950 | 145 | 48.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 3913 | 1804 | 1983 | 126 | 46.1% |
| French Defense | 3751 | 1654 | 1976 | 121 | 44.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 3682 | 1477 | 2067 | 138 | 40.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 3174 | 1379 | 1692 | 103 | 43.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2742 | 1226 | 1419 | 97 | 44.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Bishop's Opening | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Three Knights Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 2 |
| Losing | 27 | 0 |