Gaurav Sharma (aka KingGS007)
From the humble beginnings in October 2012 with a respectable Daily rating of 1200 (not shabby for a start!), Gaurav Sharma—better known by his online war name KingGS007—has been crafting his legacy one chess move at a time.
A versatile player, Gaurav excels in multiple time controls but truly shines in the fast-paced realm of Bullet chess, where his peak elo soared to an impressive 1772 in March 2024. His blitz and rapid ratings are nothing to sneeze at either, peaking at 1878 and 1731 respectively—proving he's not just a speedster but also a tactically acute strategizer.
Over the years, Gaurav has logged an impressive number of games across all formats, demonstrating not just grit but stamina; with a win ratio near 49% in Bullet, he battles head-to-head against death-by-time and swift checkmates as fiercely as any grandmaster. His resilience shines, boasting a comeback rate of over 77%, taking phrase “never say die” from cliché to chessboard reality.
Known for his endgame savvy—frequently twisting endings with an average game length around 60 moves—he combines patience and precision, which might sound boring, but would you want to mess with a guy who's mastered both rapid fire and marathon contests? Probably not.
His psychological game is as strong as his tactical prowess. While some players might fold under the pressure (aka tilt), Gaurav keeps his cool with only a 22% tilt factor. His favorite battle time? Late evening around 9 PM, the prime hour when kings and queens shine brightest (or when opponents might just be too sleepy).
Curious what openings give him the swagger? In the fast and furious Bullet sphere, he dances with the Queens Pawn Opening achieving a 100% win rate over 6 games—not to mention a comfy 83% success with the Giuoco Piano Game in rapid battles, possibly because who doesn’t love a good old Italian attack?
Chess Family and Rivals
Gaurav’s favorite sparring partners include stalwarts like sasimv (259 encounters) and gaurav_knight (145 battles), with battle statistics reflecting the fierce competition on both sides. Among his repertoire of opponents, he exhibits notable dominance over some with a win rate exceeding 90%! But hey, every warrior has their kryptonite; he’s also had tight struggles versus certain rivals — but he always shows up for the rematch.
Signature Victory Moves
One of his most recent thrilling victories involved a classic checkmate finish after a well-calculated series of exchanges involving a fiery Caro-Kann Defense. Gaurav’s tactical awareness, combined with a killer endgame, sealed the deal before the clock could strike panic mode.
In short: Gaurav Sharma is the chess player you want on your side when the clock is ticking, the position looks messy, and you need a combo of speed, strategy, and a tiny dose of magic.
Current status: Active and hungry for more glory—watch out, chess world, KingGS007 is making his moves!
Peak Ratings
- Daily: 1777 (June 2021)
- Blitz: 1878 (February 2017)
- Rapid: 1731 (September 2015)
- Bullet: 1772 (March 2024)
What you’re doing well
- You actively seek tactical chances in the bullet format and are comfortable sacrificing to seize the initiative when the opponent overextends.
- Your pieces often coordinate well, especially when rooks and bishops operate along open lines or threaten back-rank weaknesses.
- You show determination in dynamic positions and can convert pressure into a decisive sequence when the opponent missteps.
Patterns from your recent bullet games
- Several wins came from unbalancing the position with active piece play and timely pawn pushes that create strong attacking chances.
- Some losses came from tactical oversights or exchanges under time pressure, which allowed the opponent to gain material or deploy a decisive attack.
- In fast games, you sometimes spend more time on complex middlegame decisions and rush the endgame transition. This can lead to missed wins or tricky checks for your opponent.
Key areas to improve
- Clock discipline in bullet: build a consistent tempo. Consider budgeting a rough move-time plan, for example aiming for roughly the same amount of time per move in the first 15–20 moves and reserving a small reserve for critical tactics.
- Tactical vigilance: before making forcing moves, quickly count attackers and defenders and scan for hidden tactics your opponent might have. A quick threat check after each candidate move helps avoid blunders.
- Endgame transition and conversion: practice converting advantages in simplified rook-and-pawn endings. Learn a few standard rook endgame plan ideas (opposition, cutting off the king, active rook behind passed pawns).
- Opening familiarity: focus on 1–2 reliable lines for white and black in bullet. Having a concrete plan in the early middlegame reduces time spent recalculating and lowers the chance of falling into unfamiliar middlegame motifs.
- Blunder avoidance with quick post-game notes: after each game, jot down the top two mistakes and one improvement to apply next time.
Practical plan for the next week
- Daily 15–20 minutes of focused tactical puzzles that emphasize checks, captures, and forcing moves to sharpen pattern recognition under time pressure.
- Two short opening practice sessions: pick one white line and one black line to solidify the early middlegame plan and reduce on-the-fly guesswork.
- Post-game review routine: after each bullet game, write a 2-3 sentence note on what went right and what could be improved, then apply that in the next game.
- Clock management drill: play a 1-minute game with a timer that forces you to record a quick first impression of the position before moving, helping you train fast, accurate decisions.
Openings guidance (high level)
Your openings data suggests solid results with a variety of defense setups. Consider reinforcing a compact, repeatable plan in two openings to build familiarity and reduce time spent in the early middlegame. Use those lines to reach comfortable middlegame positions where your tactical vision and piece activity shine.
Annotated practice snippet
Here is a quick annotated snippet you can use for training. It illustrates building a small initiative and finishing with a tactical finish. You can try reconstructing a similar flow in your next practice game.
Optional quick reference
If you want to review a particular recent game, I can extract a concise, move-by-move summary focusing on the critical turning points and suggested improvements.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| raymondmaglilong | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| ashwath_8 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| maceres19 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| hkuyumcu1 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| animesh_ap | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| adriianezequiiel | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| ventiphreshhhh | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| slavko_vuk | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| johnfelix15364 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| abcedil | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| sasimv | 116W / 123L / 20D | |
| gaurav_knight | 58W / 82L / 5D | |
| keeptalkinimwinning | 82W / 54L / 4D | |
| egy_hawk | 58W / 67L / 5D | |
| shailendraabc | 41W / 68L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1584 | 1619 | ||
| 2024 | 1540 | 1517 | 1687 | 1619 |
| 2023 | 1637 | 1719 | 1274 | 1651 |
| 2022 | 1443 | 1785 | 1675 | |
| 2021 | 1497 | 1644 | 1675 | |
| 2020 | 1510 | 1622 | 1484 | 1681 |
| 2019 | 1208 | 1576 | ||
| 2018 | 1522 | |||
| 2017 | 1137 | 1522 | 1550 | 1509 |
| 2016 | 964 | 1395 | 1525 | 1635 |
| 2015 | 964 | 1366 | 1721 | 1611 |
| 2014 | 1021 | 1409 | 1653 | 1555 |
| 2013 | 967 | 1260 | 1432 | 1594 |
| 2012 | 843 | 1116 | 1442 | 1252 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 483W / 437L / 20D | 460W / 450L / 15D | 62.9 |
| 2024 | 184W / 162L / 10D | 201W / 151L / 9D | 63.1 |
| 2023 | 184W / 146L / 8D | 181W / 159L / 7D | 61.9 |
| 2022 | 291W / 279L / 16D | 309W / 261L / 11D | 63.1 |
| 2021 | 818W / 664L / 45D | 768W / 742L / 37D | 62.5 |
| 2020 | 520W / 398L / 18D | 447W / 466L / 22D | 59.3 |
| 2019 | 36W / 40L / 2D | 31W / 46L / 1D | 60.5 |
| 2018 | 3W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 4L / 0D | 66.6 |
| 2017 | 95W / 91L / 4D | 76W / 110L / 7D | 61.3 |
| 2016 | 125W / 146L / 2D | 121W / 145L / 8D | 57.0 |
| 2015 | 79W / 59L / 7D | 58W / 67L / 6D | 58.3 |
| 2014 | 279W / 285L / 20D | 230W / 328L / 31D | 59.0 |
| 2013 | 566W / 790L / 65D | 541W / 846L / 55D | 53.3 |
| 2012 | 201W / 231L / 10D | 176W / 259L / 11D | 53.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 832 | 424 | 396 | 12 | 51.0% |
| Australian Defense | 428 | 226 | 196 | 6 | 52.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 339 | 159 | 173 | 7 | 46.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 300 | 130 | 164 | 6 | 43.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 226 | 114 | 107 | 5 | 50.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 225 | 105 | 119 | 1 | 46.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 215 | 100 | 111 | 4 | 46.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 211 | 95 | 107 | 9 | 45.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 204 | 108 | 92 | 4 | 52.9% |
| Slav Defense | 193 | 106 | 86 | 1 | 54.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 85 | 41 | 40 | 4 | 48.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 57 | 18 | 35 | 4 | 31.6% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 46 | 25 | 20 | 1 | 54.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 41 | 19 | 18 | 4 | 46.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 36 | 16 | 16 | 4 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 35 | 14 | 20 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Czech Defense | 34 | 14 | 19 | 1 | 41.2% |
| Philidor Defense | 27 | 8 | 17 | 2 | 29.6% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 24 | 15 | 9 | 0 | 62.5% |
| King's Indian Defense | 23 | 8 | 15 | 0 | 34.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 131 | 56 | 68 | 7 | 42.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 93 | 46 | 42 | 5 | 49.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 67 | 30 | 35 | 2 | 44.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 51 | 25 | 24 | 2 | 49.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 49 | 19 | 29 | 1 | 38.8% |
| French Defense | 43 | 22 | 18 | 3 | 51.2% |
| Czech Defense | 41 | 21 | 19 | 1 | 51.2% |
| Scotch Game | 39 | 17 | 21 | 1 | 43.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 38 | 15 | 23 | 0 | 39.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 38 | 22 | 16 | 0 | 57.9% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 170 | 82 | 82 | 6 | 48.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 126 | 65 | 56 | 5 | 51.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 98 | 54 | 42 | 2 | 55.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 92 | 55 | 35 | 2 | 59.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 68 | 33 | 34 | 1 | 48.5% |
| Australian Defense | 67 | 32 | 33 | 2 | 47.8% |
| Czech Defense | 64 | 26 | 37 | 1 | 40.6% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 59 | 23 | 35 | 1 | 39.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 57 | 30 | 26 | 1 | 52.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 56 | 32 | 23 | 1 | 57.1% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 5 |
| Losing | 21 | 0 |