Player Profile: kleoj
Meet kleoj, a determined chess aficionado with a rollercoaster rating journey through the years. Starting off in 2013 with a Blitz rating around 1463 and a Rapid of 1599, kleoj has seen the ebbs and flows of competitive chess, juggling daily, blitz, rapid, and even bullet games with varying success. Don’t let the rating dips fool you – behind the numbers is a player who refuses to quit, boasting a comeback rate of 66.11%, meaning if kleoj loses a piece, there’s a 100% chance they’ll fight back hard and often win.
Strategic and steady, kleoj is a slow-and-steady type in the endgame, participating in endgames in nearly 54% of their games and delighting in long battles with an average of about 54 moves per win. The psychological resilience is evident with a low "One-Sided Loss Rate" of just 2.36% and a decent tilt factor of 24, proving kleoj is mostly calm, unless the queen suddenly disappears (or maybe a blunder or two sneaks in late at night).
When it comes to openings, kleoj likes to keep things Top Secret—it's their most played opening across formats, with nearly 10,000 blitz games alone and a win rate hovering around 50%. Other favorite tactical plays include the Trompowsky Attack and the London System, where kleoj’s win rate jumps up to ~58%, proving they handle tricky positions like a grandmaster in disguise (or at least a future one). Fun fact: kleoj can boast a 100% win rate against several sparring partners – lucky them!
As for playing times, kleoj is a creature of habit with peak winning hours between 2 AM and 5 AM, where the win rate can hit nearly 70%. Maybe the moonlight fuels their brilliance or they just enjoy the peace and quiet of late-night brainiac battles. The worst times are around 8 to 9 PM, so if you challenge kleoj then, be prepared for a fierce fight!
In summary: kleoj is a relentless, tactical, and endgame-loving player, who enjoys surprising opponents with secret openings and thrives in the wee hours. Their style is a blend of endurance, resilience, and that quiet confidence of someone who knows every lost piece is just an opportunity in disguise. Just don’t wake them before 2 AM – their chess might suffer, and their coffee supply might deplete.
Quick summary
Nice session — you found tactical wins and you’re opportunistic in the opening. The recent wins show good pattern recognition (you punished hanging queens and loose pieces). The losses are mostly a mix of time trouble and positional/endgame issues. Overall trend: +177 over 3 months and +25 over 6 months — that’s real progress.
Strengths to keep doing
- You spot basic tactical shots quickly — the win where you captured on d8 and the other where you won on d7 show you see hanging major pieces under pressure.
- Opening consistency: you return to the same plan (d4 + Bg5 lines). That helps you get to positions you know and saves clock time.
- Resilience: despite many games, your long-term slope is positive (3/6/12 month slopes all up), showing steady improvement and volume practice.
- Good win rate in some openings (Four Knights, Blackburne Shilling, Petrov) — you have lines that work for you, keep them in your toolbox.
Biggest issues right now
- Time trouble / flagging: several games ended on time. In bullet the clock is a weapon — avoid complex decision-heavy positions when your time is low.
- Endgame technique and simplification decisions: in longer games you sometimes reach messy rook-and-pawn endings with less time and lose the conversion or get into counterplay.
- Some avoidable tactical oversights from the other side don’t always become wins because you don’t always follow up precisely. Convert the advantage — trading into a simple winning endgame is often the safest path under time pressure.
- Opening traps are good to use, but rely on them less as your only strategy. At higher levels they stop working; deepen a couple of sound lines so you aren’t surprised by routine replies.
Concrete, short-term plan (next 2 weeks)
- Daily tactical warm-up: 15–25 timed puzzles focusing on forks, skewers and queen traps (10 minutes total). Those patterns paid off in your wins — make them automatic.
- Clock training: play 6–10 games at 5+0 or 3+2 — this forces you to make decisions faster while having a tiny buffer. Practice converting a small advantage with the clock ticking.
- One opening refresher: take your Levitsky-style setup (d4, Bg5, c3/e3) and review 3 common replies (…h6, …Bf5, …c6). Learn the one- or two-move refutations/continuations so early moves are reflexive and save time.
- Endgame basics: 10–15 minutes on rook endgame fundamentals (active rook, cutting the king off, when to trade rooks). Even simple technique reduces losses in long games.
Bullet-specific tips
- Pre-move smart: only pre-move in forced captures or when you are sure the opponent can’t change the capture. A bad pre-move costs you the whole game.
- Early development checklist: get both knights and at least one bishop developed in the first 6–8 seconds — good development saves time later.
- Simplify when ahead on the clock: if you have a small material advantage and the opponent has little time, trade pieces and head into a straightforward mate/endgame.
- Use increment: with +1 increment, even tiny pauses are enough to avoid flagging if you play fast moves. Prioritize safe, practical moves when low on time.
Game-specific notes (quick)
- Win vs 24dimensionchess — clean tactical execution: you punished a loose queen early. Continue training queen-trap patterns (pins + discovered attacks).
- Win vs mrjamesfinlayson — you used active piece play and tactical forks (Nxd7). Keep playing active pieces into the opponent’s camp.
- Loss vs carlusmaagnsen — the endgame had active enemy rooks and passed pawns while you were short on time. Focus on simplifying when behind on the clock and on active rook technique.
- Loss vs midovich008 and agr300 — both ended on time for the opponent or you. Make time the opponent’s problem: avoid creating complex tactical positions if you’re low on the clock.
Suggested weekly routine (easy to follow)
- 3 days: 20–30 minutes tactics (timed, focusing on forks/skewers/discovered attacks).
- 2 days: 30 minutes opening review + 2–3 practice games at 3+2 or 5+0.
- 1 day: 15 minutes rook endgames / simple endgame drill.
- Play 20–30 bullet games per week but stop the session as soon as you feel tilt or time panic — quality over quantity.
Want me to dig into one game?
Paste one PGN or pick a loss you want deep analysis on and I’ll give a move-by-move postmortem and very specific improvements. If you want, I can also generate a short drill set tailored to your common mistakes.
Replay one winning tactic
Here’s the short sequence from your tidy tactical win (you can replay it):
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| carlusmaagnsen | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| midovich008 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| 24dimensionchess | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| agr300 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| mrjamesfinlayson | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| gr8chesst | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| thehotsauce3714 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| iotjanitor | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ro1208 | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| sahil_3315 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rojean4 | 747W / 508L / 172D | View Games |
| minas681 | 199W / 46L / 15D | View Games |
| lizzy448 | 6W / 19L / 3D | View Games |
| ericdsouza | 9W / 8L / 1D | View Games |
| Ericson Rosana | 13W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 520 | 974 | 1660 | 1383 |
| 2024 | 343 | 1297 | 1671 | 1584 |
| 2023 | 341 | 1261 | 1709 | 1473 |
| 2022 | 424 | 1403 | 1662 | 1460 |
| 2021 | 1117 | 1710 | ||
| 2020 | 1141 | 1594 | ||
| 2019 | 697 | 1189 | 1661 | |
| 2018 | 1226 | 1639 | ||
| 2017 | 1518 | 1618 | 1525 | |
| 2016 | 1433 | 1698 | 1798 | |
| 2015 | 1212 | 1642 | 1759 | |
| 2014 | 1341 | 1644 | 1930 | |
| 2013 | 1463 | 1599 | 1834 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2390W / 2328L / 66D | 2330W / 2366L / 79D | 46.2 |
| 2024 | 1804W / 1642L / 107D | 1728W / 1729L / 94D | 52.9 |
| 2023 | 1411W / 1230L / 112D | 1297W / 1309L / 130D | 60.2 |
| 2022 | 1382W / 1287L / 112D | 1354W / 1305L / 100D | 55.4 |
| 2021 | 302W / 164L / 39D | 283W / 181L / 56D | 71.6 |
| 2020 | 359W / 243L / 49D | 313W / 257L / 74D | 74.0 |
| 2019 | 211W / 154L / 13D | 186W / 179L / 17D | 61.3 |
| 2018 | 62W / 72L / 3D | 60W / 74L / 3D | 60.7 |
| 2017 | 339W / 277L / 18D | 323W / 282L / 13D | 56.2 |
| 2016 | 183W / 129L / 11D | 232W / 182L / 8D | 60.6 |
| 2015 | 269W / 198L / 19D | 253W / 211L / 20D | 61.8 |
| 2014 | 279W / 214L / 9D | 262W / 211L / 16D | 62.0 |
| 2013 | 606W / 403L / 20D | 594W / 411L / 37D | 68.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 3243 | 1613 | 1604 | 26 | 49.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1392 | 656 | 732 | 4 | 47.1% |
| Australian Defense | 1041 | 522 | 512 | 7 | 50.1% |
| Four Knights Game | 807 | 464 | 339 | 4 | 57.5% |
| Petrov's Defense | 585 | 298 | 282 | 5 | 50.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 477 | 268 | 206 | 3 | 56.2% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 404 | 185 | 215 | 4 | 45.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 385 | 177 | 203 | 5 | 46.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 340 | 155 | 179 | 6 | 45.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 317 | 147 | 168 | 2 | 46.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1558 | 832 | 589 | 137 | 53.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 876 | 480 | 342 | 54 | 54.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 702 | 354 | 309 | 39 | 50.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 332 | 172 | 147 | 13 | 51.8% |
| Australian Defense | 281 | 156 | 111 | 14 | 55.5% |
| Petrov's Defense | 266 | 130 | 117 | 19 | 48.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 259 | 144 | 101 | 14 | 55.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 238 | 126 | 103 | 9 | 52.9% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 213 | 113 | 71 | 29 | 53.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 193 | 92 | 86 | 15 | 47.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 201 | 129 | 64 | 8 | 64.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 131 | 98 | 29 | 4 | 74.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 94 | 62 | 30 | 2 | 66.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 57 | 39 | 17 | 1 | 68.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 44 | 30 | 10 | 4 | 68.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 31 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 74.2% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 26 | 16 | 7 | 3 | 61.5% |
| Australian Defense | 24 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 66.7% |
| French Defense | 20 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 65.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 20 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 2637 | 1333 | 1189 | 115 | 50.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2358 | 1151 | 1120 | 87 | 48.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1015 | 571 | 415 | 29 | 56.3% |
| Petrov's Defense | 999 | 476 | 485 | 38 | 47.6% |
| Australian Defense | 664 | 347 | 305 | 12 | 52.3% |
| Four Knights Game | 657 | 357 | 258 | 42 | 54.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 600 | 304 | 286 | 10 | 50.7% |
| French Defense | 508 | 273 | 220 | 15 | 53.7% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 451 | 226 | 206 | 19 | 50.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 394 | 185 | 199 | 10 | 47.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 24 | 2 |