Avatar of Jorge

Jorge

Username: koadik

Playing Since: 2010-07-09 (Active)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟♟♟♟

Chess.com

Daily: 1936
16W / 7L / 2D
Rapid: 1860
47W / 45L / 4D
Blitz: 2379
25854W / 23588L / 1786D
Bullet: 1825
15736W / 14806L / 329D

About Jorge

Jorge, better known online as koadik, treats the online board like his playground and laboratory. He burst onto the rapid scene and has grown into a friendly, sharp competitor who loves turning tight positions into wins with calm, methodical endgames. Fans enjoy the mix of humor and tenacity in his games, where a near-mistimed tactic often becomes a masterpiece two moves later.

Active through 2025, Jorge keeps his blade sharp in Rapid chess—the format that suits his fast-thinking style. For a quick glance at his trajectory, see a snapshot here:

Rapid Rating201020112012201320212022202419781505YearRapid Rating
.

Chess Journey and Playing Style

Rapid is his preferred time control, but his versatility shines across Blitz, Bullet, and Daily formats. He embraces long battles and thrives in the endgame, where his frequency is high (81.05%). His resilience is legendary, with a longest winning streak of 19 and a longest losing streak of 24, proving that comebacks are his middle name.

  • Preferred time control: Rapid
  • Longest winning streak: 19
  • Longest losing streak: 24
  • Endgame frequency: 81.05%

Moments of peak performance are recorded across formats: Blitz 2345 (2025-02-01), Rapid 2287 (2021-04-03), and Bullet 2211 (2011-03-05).

Openings and Performance Highlights

In Blitz, he shines with the King's Indian Defense (Averbakh Variation) and Diemer-Duhm Gambit ideas, showcasing his comfort in dynamic, complex positions:

  • King's Indian Defense (Averbakh Variation) — Blitz: 1219 games, 706 wins, win rate 57.92%
  • Diemer-Duhm Gambit (4...f5) — Blitz: 1688 games, 880 wins, win rate 52.13%
  • Australian Defense — Blitz: 1325 games, 697 wins, win rate 52.6%
  • Sicilian Defense: Closed — Blitz: 1034 games, 525 wins, win rate 50.77%
  • Sicilian Defense — Closed and other lines populate Bullet and Rapid streams with solid results as well

Openings performance across Bullet and Rapid also features strong showings in Modern Defense lines and King’s Indian families. See more in the openings dataset:

Rapid Rating201020112012201320212022202419781505YearRapid Rating
.

Opponents and Profile

Jorge has faced a lively roster of online rivals. The most played opponents include loloso, dnbory, exterminator440, and katpawrov. His results against some of these rivals show a healthy balance of wins and losses: loloso 102–47, dnbory 62–57, exterminator440 55–43, katpawrov 41–55. You can learn more about his journey by visiting the profile: Jorge.

  • Most played: loloso — 149 games
  • Most played: dnbory — 119 games
  • Most played: exterminator440 — 99 games
  • Most played: katpawrov — 99 games

For a quick read of activity, see this snapshot:

Rapid Rating201020112012201320212022202419781505YearRapid Rating
.

Notes

Want a deeper dive? The data sketches a lively career across years and formats, with a preferred rhythm in Rapid and a knack for turning endgames into triumphs. Jorge


Coach's Avatar

Recent rapid games: what’s going well and what to improve

You’ve been playing with energy and willingness to complicate the position when you have the initiative. In rapid, this style can generate chances, but it also increases the risk of misjudging exchanges or missing a simpler plan. The key is to convert advantages into clear, steady progress and keep calm when the position becomes tactical.

  • Strengths you can lean on: you handle sharp, dynamic positions well and you look for activity with your pieces. This helps you press opponents and create practical chances in the middlegame.
  • Common improvement opportunities: after initiating complications, pause to verify your material balance and your king safety. In rapid, a small miscalculation can swing the momentum quickly. Focus on consolidating once you gain a lead in space or development, then convert with precise exchanges or a clear plan.
  • Time management note: aim to allocate your thinking time so you have a buffer in the later moves. This reduces the likelihood of rushing critical decisions when the board tightens.

Key improvement areas with actionable steps

  • Convert advantages steadily: practice turning a small plus into a clear pawn or activity edge before attempting heavy tactical sequences. Use a simple checklist before each exchange sequence: who is safer, who has the better pawn structure, and where are the open files?
  • Pattern recognition and anti-tactics: study common tactical motifs that frequently appear in your openings (for example, responses in the Slav/Slav-Exchange-type structures and Sicilian lines). Build a short mental catalog of typical threats and safe responses.
  • Time management routine: set a target time budget per phase of the game (opening, middlegame, endgame) and use a 1-2 minute review at the 20-move mark to ensure you’re heading toward a clear plan rather than chasing dynamic complications.
  • Endgame readiness: strengthen rook and minor piece endgames. Practice simple conversions (rook ending with opposite-colored pawns, king activity in rook endings) so you can close games more reliably when material is equal or you’re slightly up.

Opening focus: where to deepen your repertoire

Your openings show meaningful results in some lines. Based on performance data, you tend to do well with the Sicilian Defense and the Queen’s Gambit Declined (specifically lines around 4.Nf3), and you’ve had notable success with the Diemer-Duhm Gambit in practice. Some other lines have been less successful, so it’s wise to focus on a compact, coherent set of openings.

  • Prioritize: Sicilian Defense (solid main-line ideas and key pawn structures) and Queen’s Gambit Declined family (4.Nf3 and related setups). Build familiarity with typical middlegame plans and common strategic goals in these branches.
  • Approach cautiously: the Diemer-Duhm Gambit shows a high win rate in your data, but it’s an offbeat choice that requires precise calculation. If you enjoy it, keep it as a surprise weapon rather than your primary weapon, and study the typical pawn structures and tactical ideas that arise.
  • Be mindful of weaker lines: Modern Defense, Slav Exchange variations, Catalan and some Bogo-Indian setups have shown less consistent results. Consider either avoiding them in rapid or preparing clear, model lines to reduce uncertainty.

Practice plan for the coming weeks

  • Opening study (2 sessions per week): deepen two main openings (Sicilian and QGD family). Learn 2-3 representative middlegame plans and the typical endgames that arise from each.
  • Tactics and pattern drills (daily): 15-20 minutes of puzzles with focus on motifs common in your repertoire (pressure on the king, piece coordination, typical tactical nets in the Sicilian and QGD structures).
  • Endgame practice (2 sessions per week): rook endings, rook + minor piece endings, and simple pawn endgames from your favorable structures.
  • Post-game review (after each session): write down one critical decision you made, one better alternative, and one concrete plan for the next game in a short chess journal.
  • Play with intent: in your next 6-8 rapid games, aim to execute the plan from your chosen opening, consolidate early, and only commit to tactical sequences after confirming your position’s safety and plan alignment.

Short, actionable drill you can start now

Pick one of your top openings (Sicilian or QGD). Set up a few typical middlegame plans in your head and test them in a 2-3 games mini-cycle. After each game, note a) the plan you attempted, b) whether you achieved it, and c) one improvement to apply in the next game. If you’d like, I can generate a focused practice PGN for you to study and replay in a few minutes.



🆚 Opponent Insights

Recent Opponents
Lars Meyer 13W / 16L / 1D
djuskaj 3W / 8L / 0D
Ulrich Schulze 11W / 9L / 0D
maikl5005 5W / 11L / 3D
swop1107 2W / 4L / 1D
amourshinyo 2W / 5L / 0D
yourrowner 0W / 1L / 0D
jasonrbt 0W / 2L / 0D
vmezentsev 4W / 2L / 0D
ata101 1W / 0L / 0D
Most Played Opponents
loloso 102W / 47L / 0D
dnbory 62W / 57L / 0D
Alan Piper 41W / 55L / 3D
Wilson Fuertes 55W / 43L / 1D
began 58W / 33L / 1D

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2025 1825 2429
2024 1929 2238 1860
2023 1987 2156
2022 1648 2124 1876
2021 1457 2073 1978
2020 1832 2149
2019 1748 2136
2018 1779 2082 1936
2017 1758 2069
2016 1705 2032 1845
2015 1782 1980 1879
2014 1568 1829
2013 1812 1844 1760 2026
2012 1787 1814 1741 2022
2011 1869 1844 1717 1949
2010 1858 1808 1505
Rating by Year201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202524291457YearRatingBulletBlitzRapidDaily

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2025 1734W / 1557L / 83D 1600W / 1646L / 118D 73.2
2024 1860W / 1991L / 130D 1704W / 2128L / 157D 75.2
2023 3897W / 3355L / 121D 3789W / 3493L / 141D 67.5
2022 1029W / 785L / 61D 1010W / 783L / 71D 74.3
2021 764W / 550L / 45D 735W / 587L / 50D 75.4
2020 1171W / 836L / 60D 1082W / 906L / 57D 75.1
2019 2078W / 1682L / 82D 1960W / 1785L / 70D 70.6
2018 1125W / 949L / 57D 976W / 1068L / 58D 74.6
2017 259W / 217L / 20D 239W / 248L / 7D 77.4
2016 741W / 657L / 39D 657W / 699L / 40D 78.9
2015 828W / 702L / 44D 746W / 792L / 30D 77.6
2014 430W / 397L / 22D 413W / 412L / 24D 76.4
2013 1035W / 834L / 55D 990W / 892L / 49D 76.5
2012 946W / 875L / 53D 871W / 940L / 65D 78.8
2011 1506W / 1450L / 100D 1503W / 1453L / 77D 77.2
2010 1963W / 1861L / 60D 1982W / 1829L / 65D 70.3

Openings: Most Played

Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation 6078 3149 2721 208 51.8%
Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 1737 911 774 52 52.5%
Australian Defense 1335 700 593 42 52.4%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 1314 644 615 55 49.0%
Sicilian Defense 1302 677 573 52 52.0%
King's Indian Defense 1225 709 490 26 57.9%
Slav Defense 1200 624 530 46 52.0%
Queen's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation 1157 627 501 29 54.2%
Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation 1088 521 516 51 47.9%
Sicilian Defense: Closed 1048 531 478 39 50.7%
Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Australian Defense 2970 1522 1422 26 51.2%
Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation 2342 1217 1099 26 52.0%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 1870 950 893 27 50.8%
Amazon Attack 1778 880 874 24 49.5%
Amar Gambit 1376 691 672 13 50.2%
Sicilian Defense 1077 553 506 18 51.4%
Colle: 3...Bf5, Alekhine Variation 940 482 451 7 51.3%
Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 756 421 323 12 55.7%
Sicilian Defense: Closed 707 329 372 6 46.5%
Slav Defense 665 328 327 10 49.3%
Rapid Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation 12 3 9 0 25.0%
Sicilian Defense 7 5 2 0 71.4%
QGD: 4.Nf3 5 4 1 0 80.0%
Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 5 4 1 0 80.0%
Slav Defense 4 1 3 0 25.0%
King's Indian Defense 3 2 1 0 66.7%
Catalan Opening 3 0 3 0 0.0%
Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation 3 2 1 0 66.7%
QGD: 4.Bg5 Be7 5.cxd5 Nxd5 2 2 0 0 100.0%
Caro-Kann Defense: Panov Attack 2 2 0 0 100.0%
Daily Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
King's Indian Defense 3 1 2 0 33.3%
Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation 2 1 1 0 50.0%
QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 2 1 1 0 50.0%
Slav Defense 2 1 1 0 50.0%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 1 1 0 0 100.0%
QGD Tarrasch: 4.cxd5 1 1 0 0 100.0%
QGD: 4.Nf3 1 1 0 0 100.0%
Blumenfeld Countergambit 1 1 0 0 100.0%
Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon 1 0 1 0 0.0%
Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation 1 0 1 0 0.0%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 19 0
Losing 24 1