Profile Summary: kolver
Meet kolver, a chess enthusiast whose bullet rating soared from a humble 1362 in 2015 to a spectacular 2882 forecast for 2025—yes, you read that right, practically rocket-fueled! With over 35,000 bullet games under their belt and a win record that would make even Magnus nod in approval (15,280 wins to 10,816 losses), kolver is the kind of player who thrives when the clock is ticking down into madness.
Blitz chess? Bring it on! With a max blitz rating peaking above 2600, kolver combines rapid-fire intuition with tactical brilliance, leading to a win rate over 67% in some of their favorite openings. From Alekhine's Scandinavian Variation to the Trojan Horse of the Trompowsky Attack, they’ve carved a niche in openings that keep opponents guessing and losing.
Despite the aggressive pace, kolver's endgame prowess shines with an impressive 87% endgame frequency—they stick around to the bitter end, savoring tactical opportunities that turn the tide. A comeback rate nearing 93% means surrender is off the table; kolver fights tooth and nail, even when losing pieces, boasting a perfect 100% win rate in such desperate situations. Talk about resilience!
Strategic? Check. Swift? Check. Slightly unpredictable? Check. With an average of over 84 moves per win, patience and endurance fuel kolver’s style, ensuring no position is left unexplored. Black pieces or white, their win rates stay comfortably above 53%, proving versatility across the color spectrum.
Off the board, kolver probably keeps opponents awake at night dreaming of their next blitz battle. Just beware the Tilt Factor of 15—because even grandmasters have their off days, and kolver’s not immune to a little chess drama now and then.
In sum, kolver is not just a player; they're a blitzing bullet maestro, an endgame gladiator, and an opening innovator. Ready your clock and prepare to be dazzled or dashed—because with kolver on the board, every second counts and every move matters.
What went well in your recent rapid games
You showed willingness to play sharp, tactic-rich lines and kept your pieces active in the middlegame. When your initiative landed, you converted pressure into tangible gains and finished strong in several games. Your ability to rebound after exchanges and keep play focused on the opponent’s king has helped you score and stay competitive in fast time controls.
- Good energy in the middlegame: you consistently looked for active piece play and lines that create concrete threats.
- Strong endgame conversion: in several wins you simplified to favorable rook and pawn endings or used kingside activity to seal the game.
- Resilience under pressure: you recovered from tricky middlegame positions and kept attacking possibilities alive.
Key improvements to focus on
- Solidify your opening plan: pick 2–3 reliable responses to common setups you face and stick with a clear plan rather than improvising too much on the first 10 moves.
- Enhance central control in the early middlegame: aim to place a pawn or piece on central squares to restrict opponent counterplay and give your pieces more options.
- Time management: balance your clock so you have a clearly thought-out plan in the first and middle stages and avoid rushed decisions in critical moments.
- Endgame polish: practice simple rook endings and king activity so you can convert small advantages more reliably.
- Pattern recognition in tactics: train to spot common tactical motifs (forks, pins, discovered attacks) that recur in your openings and middlegames to avoid missed opportunities or blunders.
Opening performance snapshot and plan
Your openings show a readiness to engage in sharp, tactical play. The Amazon Attack and Siberian Attack family have been your most productive choices, delivering many wins when you land the right tactical shots. Some gambit ideas can be risky if you get outcalculated, so consider reserving them for positions where you have a clear follow-up plan.
- Strongest families: aggressive openings that lead to dynamic middlegames tend to yield the best results for you when you navigate accurately.
- Careful usage: for lines that require precise calculation (like aggressive gambits), ensure you have a well-mapped continuation against the main defensive responses.
- General guidance: when facing unfamiliar defenses, prioritize development, king safety, and a solid central presence to reach a favorable middlegame.
Training plan to boost results
To build on your strengths and address the focus areas above, try the following four-week plan.
- Week 1: Repertoire consolidation. Choose two reliable White openings you enjoy and two solid Black replies to common White setups. Learn the typical middlegame ideas and a few forcing sequences.
- Week 2: Tactics and pattern practice. Do 20–30 minutes of daily puzzles focused on motifs that appear in your chosen openings (forks, pins, discoveries, mating nets).
- Week 3: Endgame fundamentals. Practice rook endings, rook-and-pawn endings, and king activity with quick reviews after each session.
- Week 4: Time management and review routine. Play with a timer to encourage plan-making and avoid last-second moves. After each game, write a brief 3-point review of what worked and what didn’t.
Next steps and optional references
If you’d like, we can attach a focused post-game debrief for a specific win or loss. Use the plan above to guide your next sessions, and consider sharing a short PGN snapshot for a quick analysis you’d like reviewed. Example prompt for future reviews: what was your opening plan, where did you lose the initiative, and how could you stabilize the position earlier?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Nspace3 | 47W / 41L / 11D | View |
| Harshal Patil | 5W / 5L / 0D | View |
| satyasekharmitra-ind | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| gracejo | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sonic-2025 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mlapaj | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| kloyn52 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| i_am_a_bullet_g_o_a_t | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| bigmanevan | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Bacarz2006 | 9W / 2L / 3D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tiago Pereira Rodrigues | 302W / 257L / 55D | View Games |
| Leo Bispo | 148W / 138L / 21D | View Games |
| volvo333 | 122W / 127L / 18D | View Games |
| Anselm Wagner | 109W / 87L / 18D | View Games |
| kawhilockdown | 51W / 128L / 22D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2733 | |||
| 2024 | 2689 | |||
| 2023 | 2819 | 2606 | ||
| 2022 | 2606 | 2579 | 2092 | |
| 2021 | 2566 | 2439 | 2041 | |
| 2020 | 2635 | 2524 | 1764 | |
| 2019 | 2424 | 2530 | ||
| 2015 | 2200 | 2184 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1129W / 788L / 150D | 1013W / 919L / 143D | 89.5 |
| 2024 | 1896W / 1365L / 262D | 1735W / 1495L / 282D | 89.5 |
| 2023 | 1628W / 1240L / 272D | 1568W / 1320L / 245D | 91.5 |
| 2022 | 3420W / 1300L / 370D | 3274W / 1433L / 359D | 82.4 |
| 2021 | 751W / 595L / 134D | 748W / 585L / 132D | 88.5 |
| 2020 | 778W / 552L / 114D | 746W / 611L / 97D | 88.2 |
| 2019 | 1238W / 792L / 179D | 1196W / 862L / 155D | 86.7 |
| 2015 | 42W / 12L / 5D | 41W / 19L / 1D | 81.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 3067 | 1718 | 1121 | 228 | 56.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2807 | 1580 | 1014 | 213 | 56.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2074 | 1090 | 836 | 148 | 52.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1441 | 781 | 563 | 97 | 54.2% |
| Australian Defense | 1258 | 748 | 419 | 91 | 59.5% |
| Döry Defense | 1200 | 649 | 444 | 107 | 54.1% |
| Modern | 1126 | 640 | 425 | 61 | 56.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 888 | 496 | 334 | 58 | 55.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 846 | 456 | 315 | 75 | 53.9% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 843 | 471 | 298 | 74 | 55.9% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 219 | 163 | 37 | 19 | 74.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 187 | 145 | 29 | 13 | 77.5% |
| Döry Defense | 102 | 57 | 37 | 8 | 55.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 99 | 64 | 26 | 9 | 64.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 92 | 79 | 10 | 3 | 85.9% |
| Modern | 90 | 58 | 27 | 5 | 64.4% |
| Australian Defense | 82 | 57 | 19 | 6 | 69.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 73 | 56 | 13 | 4 | 76.7% |
| Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation | 67 | 48 | 16 | 3 | 71.6% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 59 | 47 | 9 | 3 | 79.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 90.9% |
| Alekhine Defense | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Modern | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 33 | 0 |
| Losing | 15 | 2 |