Konstantin Nikologorskiy - International Master
Known in the chess world as Kostya_Nikologorskiy, Konstantin is no stranger to both the thrill of a bullet blitz and the intricate dance of a rapid endgame. Earning the prestigious title of International Master from FIDE, Kostya's journey through the ranks is as impressive as his knack for delivering spectacular comebacks.
Rating Milestones
- Blitz rating peaked at an astonishing 2760 in 2021, with his average consistently soaring above 2500 in recent years.
- Bullet wasn't far behind, reaching a high of 2773 in 2021, proving Kostya can think fast and strike faster.
- Rapid ratings touched up to 2735 in 2020, showcasing his adaptability across formats.
Playing Style & Personality
With an endgame frequency of over 71%, Konstantin relishes a good fight to the bitter end. He boasts a remarkable 81% comeback rate, which means even if things look grim, Kostya might still have a few tricks up his sleeve. Known for a white win rate of nearly 65%, and not too shabby at 62% with black either, his balanced prowess keeps opponents guessing.
Beware: his tilt factor sits at a modest 10, suggesting he can handle the pressure well—until someone steals his coffee. His average moves per win hover around 69, so expect a true strategic marathon, not a sprint.
Record & Opponents
Kostya’s blitz record reads like a warrior’s ledger: over 1250 wins against 635 losses and 122 draws. In bullet, he racked up 1025 wins! Opponents like kirill_klukin and mynameisbuba22 have learned to fear his precise counterattacks—he has a 100% win rate against both!
Fun Fact
Konstantin's longest winning streak clocks in at an epic 34 games. Rumor has it he celebrated by doing a victory dance that scared off a family of pigeons in the park.
At the board, Kostya isn't just playing chess; he’s performing a masterclass in patience, strategy, and the art of bouncing back. Whether you're aiming to best him or learn from his playbook, one thing is clear: underestimating Konstantin Nikologorskiy would be... checkmate in the making.
Overview of your recent daily games
You’ve shown solid willingness to test sharp openings and you’ve demonstrated good tactical awareness in several wins. Your openings data indicates versatility across a range of modern lines, and your recent track record shows you can convert advantages into wins when you stay focused in the middle game and avoid over-ambitious pawn pushes. There are clear moments of strong calculation, especially in lines that lead to concrete tactical chances.
What you did well
- You handled aggressive opening choices with good piece activity and clean development, keeping your king safe while generating pressure on key files and diagonals.
- You showed tactical sharpness in strategic middlegames, often creating forcing sequences that challenge your opponent’s plans.
- You converted a notable tactic into a winning finish in at least one game, demonstrating your ability to spot and execute concrete combinations under time pressure.
- Your openings versatility gives you flexibility to respond to different setups, which is valuable for adapting to opponents’ ideas.
Areas to improve
- Focus on conversion: when you gain a small edge, work on a clear plan to convert it to a larger advantage rather than trading too many pieces and drifting into drawn positions.
- Time management: balance your clock so you don’t overthink critical moments and allow yourself extra time for the most instructive positions.
- Endgame technique: practice common endgames that arise from your openings to ensure you can press advantages all the way to a win, not just an equal or unclear ending.
- Positional decisions after exchanges: in some middlegames, aim for simpler structures that retain your activity and limit your opponent’s counterplay rather than chasing complex, uncertain lines.
Opening performance snapshot
Your openings show solid results across several major lines, including the Sicilian Najdorf variation, the Moscow variation, the French Advance variation, and the Giuoco Piano. This breadth is a strength, but you’ll benefit from deepening a smaller set of lines to build a clear, repeatable middlegame plan for each. Be mindful of lines that have produced draws or losses and prepare straightforward, practical plans against them.
Practical next steps and a simple plan
- Choose two openings to deepen in the next month (for example, Sicilian Najdorf and Giuoco Piano) and study their typical middlegame plans. Create a short repertoire note for each with a few go-to ideas you can rely on in the early middlegame.
- Engage in daily tactics practice (about 15–20 minutes) focusing on patterns that recur in your openings, such as back-rank motifs, tactic nets, and forcing lines that lead to clear material gains or checkmates.
- After each daily game, write a three-bullet recap: what went well, what didn’t, and one concrete adjustment you will try in the next game.
- Practice endgames relevant to your openings. Learn a few solid rook endgame ideas and common pawn endgames to improve your conversion rate in longer games.
- Keep an eye on time usage during the opening phase: set a rough plan to avoid spending excessive time on early moves and keep a reserve for critical junctures.
Optional study aids
If you’d like, I can tailor a compact study pack for your two chosen openings with practical plans and a handful of example positions to practice. You can also share your next game PGNs and I’ll tailor notes after reviewing them.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| katewait | 52W / 42L / 14D | View Games |
| stepan2016 | 26W / 15L / 6D | View Games |
| vitaminchikvchess | 23W / 17L / 7D | View Games |
| alex777-1-3 | 21W / 25L / 0D | View Games |
| seva2907 | 17W / 14L / 6D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2635 | |||
| 2024 | 2589 | |||
| 2023 | 2556 | |||
| 2022 | 2652 | 2599 | 2471 | |
| 2021 | 2640 | 2662 | 2429 | |
| 2020 | 2649 | 2706 | 2240 | |
| 2019 | 2522 | 2596 | 2400 | 1625 |
| 2018 | 2409 | 2364 | ||
| 2017 | 2058 | 1786 | ||
| 2016 | 2016 | 2108 | 1671 | |
| 2015 | 2229 | 1567 | 1588 | |
| 2014 | 2039 | 1358 | 1548 | |
| 2013 | 2018 | 1804 | 1534 | |
| 2012 | 2024 | 2172 | 1337 | 1189 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5W / 5L / 1D | 6W / 2L / 1D | 98.2 |
| 2024 | 5W / 5L / 1D | 5W / 4L / 1D | 88.1 |
| 2023 | 24W / 16L / 0D | 18W / 20L / 3D | 88.8 |
| 2022 | 316W / 78L / 17D | 318W / 73L / 17D | 78.2 |
| 2021 | 265W / 138L / 25D | 204W / 145L / 32D | 76.4 |
| 2020 | 270W / 148L / 59D | 248W / 167L / 48D | 59.7 |
| 2019 | 210W / 139L / 24D | 194W / 160L / 28D | 80.1 |
| 2018 | 70W / 9L / 2D | 70W / 10L / 2D | 76.6 |
| 2017 | 12W / 3L / 0D | 12W / 1L / 0D | 55.3 |
| 2016 | 52W / 12L / 3D | 55W / 10L / 1D | 58.5 |
| 2015 | 32W / 14L / 4D | 33W / 11L / 0D | 69.9 |
| 2014 | 68W / 20L / 1D | 58W / 22L / 3D | 61.7 |
| 2013 | 48W / 15L / 0D | 44W / 12L / 0D | 59.9 |
| 2012 | 32W / 6L / 1D | 29W / 9L / 3D | 78.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 205 | 88 | 117 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 68 | 46 | 17 | 5 | 67.7% |
| French Defense | 67 | 41 | 22 | 4 | 61.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 52 | 32 | 20 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 47 | 34 | 9 | 4 | 72.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 41 | 32 | 9 | 0 | 78.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 41 | 27 | 8 | 6 | 65.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 39 | 29 | 8 | 2 | 74.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 39 | 30 | 6 | 3 | 76.9% |
| Australian Defense | 35 | 26 | 5 | 4 | 74.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 96 | 60 | 31 | 5 | 62.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 65 | 43 | 20 | 2 | 66.2% |
| Australian Defense | 44 | 31 | 13 | 0 | 70.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 43 | 25 | 16 | 2 | 58.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 42 | 26 | 16 | 0 | 61.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 40 | 30 | 8 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 39 | 30 | 7 | 2 | 76.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 38 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 37 | 28 | 7 | 2 | 75.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 34 | 23 | 11 | 0 | 67.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 45 | 34 | 6 | 5 | 75.6% |
| French Defense | 26 | 18 | 7 | 1 | 69.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 25 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 76.0% |
| Australian Defense | 19 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 84.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 19 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 84.2% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 17 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 70.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 16 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 43.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 15 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Elephant Gambit | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGA: Bishop's Gambit, Bledow, 4.Bxd5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 34 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 1 |