krstulov_alex – Chess Career Profile
krstulov_alex is a dedicated and versatile chess competitor whose career spans over a decade with profound achievements in various time formats such as Blitz, Bullet, Rapid, and Daily chess games. His journey, documented from 2013 through 2025, reflects continual growth and consistent high-level performance, with his ratings peaking impressively in different formats.
In Blitz, his ratings have climbed into the 2300s and beyond, while his Bullet ratings have reached the upper 2600s, demonstrating a remarkable tactical proficiency and rapid calculation typical of elite speed chess. His record in Rapid chess shows that when his time allows, krstulov_alex can also excel in classical battles, with key wins bolstering his reputation as a resilient competitor.
Beyond mere numbers, his playing style is characterized by strategic depth and psychological resilience. Despite a tendency toward early resignations in challenging positions, he is known for sustaining endgame intensity – with an average of around 45 moves in victories and a strong comeback rate when facing material disadvantages. His white pieces win rate slightly exceeds that with black, indicating an aggressive approach when afforded the first move.
His time performance analytics reveal versatility too; whether playing on Monday or Sunday, during the morning hours or late at night, krstulov_alex shows a consistent win rate. His peak performances during midday hours highlight a balance between mental freshness and practical experience.
A keen tactician, krstulov_alex’s games often display a high level of tactical awareness. With an impressive ability to recover even after losing material – as evidenced by his nearly 60% win rate after a piece loss – he proves his mettle under pressure. His varied opening repertory, which spans from familiar classical lines to creative novelties, and his specialty in rapid-fire bullet encounters, underline his adaptability and well-rounded skill set.
Overall, krstulov_alex embodies the spirit of modern competitive chess: continuously evolving, strategically nuanced, and mentally tough. His rating journey over the years and his performance metrics speak to a player who is not only experienced but also committed to excellence in every format of the game.
What you’re doing well
You have a strong taste for pursuing initiative in sharp, tactical lines. In several games you pick aggressive openings and create practical problems for your opponents right from the start.
- You show good calculation in forcing lines and can spot tactical opportunities to win material or gain activity.
- Your willingness to complicate positions in bullet games often puts opponents under pressure and can yield winning chances in practical play.
- You perform well with aggressive setups, indicating solid intuition for dynamic play and piece activity when the position is unsettled.
Areas to improve
- Be mindful of large material sacrifices. In some sharp lines the attack is strong, but you can end up behind in material if the initiative doesn’t convert quickly. Always have a concrete follow-up plan before committing to a heavy attack.
- Endgame conversion: several bullet endings devolve into chaotic simplifications. Strengthen basic endgame technique (rook endings, king activity, and pawn endgames) to convert advantages reliably or hold draws when needed.
- Time management in bullet: allocate a moment to sketch a simple plan after each key sequence. A quick, 3-4 move plan helps avoid getting lost in tactical melee and improves accuracy under time pressure.
- Opening resilience: while aggression works well, you’ll benefit from a paired, safer fallback plan for when the opponent neutralizes your initial attack. This helps maintain balance and reduces risk in less-clear positions.
Practical improvement plan
- Week 1: commit to daily tactics practice (15-20 minutes) and review two recent losses to identify turning points and miscalculations.
- Week 2: focus on endgames. Practice rook endings and king activity in simple rook+pawn versus rook endings to improve conversion and defense.
- Week 3: build a compact opening repertoire. Choose one aggressive White line and one solid Black setup, and learn 2-3 standard middlegame plans for each.
- Week 4: incorporate slower games (3+2 or 5+0) periodically to reinforce planning, evaluation, and decision making without the ticking clock pressure.
Opening performance insights and recommendations
Your openings data show you perform well in initiative-driven lines like Amar Gambit and Australian Defense. This strength is a valuable asset, but aim to pair it with sound, less risky alternatives for when your opponent neutralizes the initial attack. Consider adopting a small, reliable zwei-opening strategy: one aggressive White option and one solid Black response. This helps you adapt to opponents who sidestep your traps and keeps you versatile across bullet games.
Training resources and next steps
If you’d like, I can prepare a concise, annotated review from one of your recent games to highlight turning points and improve future decisions. To practice, you can try this placeholder PGN for a focused session and adapt it to your preferred time control:
.Tell me your preferred time control and the areas you want to emphasize, and I’ll tailor a two-week plan just for you.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Elie Milikow | 36W / 64L / 5D | View Games |
| Alexander Tsarkov | 45W / 25L / 0D | View Games |
| Nikola Sedlak | 28W / 24L / 15D | View Games |
| Zoltan Medvegy | 13W / 44L / 5D | View Games |
| muanadro | 24W / 25L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2750 | 2026 | 2178 | |
| 2024 | 2621 | 2068 | 2156 | |
| 2023 | 2666 | 2140 | 2094 | |
| 2022 | 2669 | 2457 | ||
| 2021 | 2692 | 2687 | ||
| 2020 | 2621 | 2561 | 1864 | 1450 |
| 2019 | 2420 | 1941 | ||
| 2018 | 2404 | 2290 | 1897 | |
| 2017 | 2340 | 2301 | 1486 | |
| 2016 | 1910 | 1884 | 1884 | 1783 |
| 2015 | 2198 | 1965 | 1976 | 1706 |
| 2014 | 2079 | 1908 | 1674 | |
| 2013 | 1988 | 1903 | 1799 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 268W / 192L / 1D | 256W / 215L / 5D | 4.1 |
| 2024 | 266W / 162L / 8D | 240W / 195L / 10D | 10.4 |
| 2023 | 782W / 637L / 20D | 699W / 644L / 12D | 8.0 |
| 2022 | 212W / 181L / 30D | 210W / 177L / 31D | 70.6 |
| 2021 | 86W / 50L / 12D | 84W / 66L / 11D | 74.5 |
| 2020 | 600W / 380L / 87D | 528W / 435L / 106D | 80.0 |
| 2019 | 265W / 184L / 32D | 227W / 233L / 29D | 75.4 |
| 2018 | 339W / 248L / 25D | 305W / 294L / 19D | 67.2 |
| 2017 | 48W / 30L / 2D | 33W / 45L / 4D | 66.1 |
| 2016 | 129W / 134L / 5D | 123W / 138L / 6D | 38.2 |
| 2015 | 39W / 30L / 4D | 41W / 24L / 4D | 77.6 |
| 2014 | 94W / 79L / 7D | 105W / 68L / 7D | 70.3 |
| 2013 | 36W / 16L / 1D | 35W / 14L / 3D | 71.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 770 | 452 | 273 | 45 | 58.7% |
| Australian Defense | 345 | 198 | 125 | 22 | 57.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 300 | 162 | 113 | 25 | 54.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 173 | 97 | 68 | 8 | 56.1% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 125 | 65 | 53 | 7 | 52.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 116 | 58 | 51 | 7 | 50.0% |
| Döry Defense | 99 | 48 | 45 | 6 | 48.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 90 | 46 | 42 | 2 | 51.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 86 | 41 | 37 | 8 | 47.7% |
| Slav Defense | 85 | 39 | 38 | 8 | 45.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 75.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 62.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Australian Defense | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% |
| Döry Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4728 | 2497 | 2205 | 26 | 52.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 224 | 116 | 83 | 25 | 51.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 161 | 84 | 58 | 19 | 52.2% |
| Australian Defense | 113 | 53 | 46 | 14 | 46.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 110 | 62 | 37 | 11 | 56.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 64 | 34 | 24 | 6 | 53.1% |
| Döry Defense | 52 | 32 | 17 | 3 | 61.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 37 | 22 | 15 | 0 | 59.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 37 | 17 | 14 | 6 | 46.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 32 | 21 | 11 | 0 | 65.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 9 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 11.1% |
| Unknown | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Döry Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 1 |