Player Profile: Lali-Rustavi
Lali-Rustavi is an enthusiastic chess competitor whose recorded games span from 2009 through the mid-2020s. Over the years, they have competed in multiple formats—most notably Daily, Blitz, Bullet, and Rapid—amassing a wealth of experience and a formidable resume of ratings. At one point, their Daily rating peaked above 2400, signaling a strong aptitude for deep plans and patient play.
Across all time controls, Lali-Rustavi shows a balanced performance. They enjoy robust results with the White pieces (winning roughly half of their White games) and maintain a competitive success rate as Black. The player’s style is especially pronounced in the endgame, a stage that unfolds in about three-quarters of their matches. Their resilience is remarkable: with a Comeback Rate above 80%, they excel at turning difficult positions into victorious outcomes.
Known for exploring a variety of openings, including both standard chess and Chess960, Lali-Rustavi has logged hundreds of games in each format. They hold an 18-game longest winning streak, indicating periods of intense focus and consistency. While their Early Resignation Rate is relatively low, they stay competitive for the long haul, often playing past 65 moves in many of their winning encounters.
Psychologically, Lali-Rustavi is adept at recovering from losses and shows particular strength in the late evening hours, which data suggests is when their performance peaks. Although they occasionally tilt, their rating gap between casual and rated matches highlights a drive to perform at their best under official conditions.
With thousands of matches played across various time controls, a proven ability to climb above 2000–2400 in rating, and a signature preference for tenacious endgame battles, Lali-Rustavi has established a solid reputation. Whether securing a comeback victory or forging an early lead, they bring energy and depth of knowledge to every board they face.
Overall Performance
Lali, your recent blitz games show a competitive level of play with a steady rating around the 1900s, reflecting solid skill and experience. Your strength adjusted win rate of approximately 51% is commendable, showing you generally outperform expectations against your opponents.
Your monthly rating trends indicate positive improvement in the short term, especially over the past 3 months with a significant upward slope. Keep leveraging this momentum to continue your progress.
Positives from Recent Games
- Opening Preparation: You are comfortable with a range of openings, such as the English Opening and King's Indian Defense, and manage to reach playable middlegames.
- Strong Positional Play: In your recent wins, you demonstrated good piece coordination and applying pressure, for example, advancing knights and placing your bishops actively.
- Effective Endgame Technique: Your wins often come from pressuring opponents into resigning as they face deteriorating positions – a sign that you convert advantages well.
- Adaptability: You handle different opening systems and positions fairly well, and your performance across openings like Caro-Kann and Modern Defense is balanced.
Areas for Improvement
- Opening Consistency: Some openings like the English Opening and Blackburne Shilling Gambit have lower win rates (35% and 40%). Consider deepening your theory or choosing lines with a clearer plan to improve these outcomes.
- Time Management: A recent loss by timeout indicates tightening your time control strategy during blitz games could help. Try practicing faster, more intuitive decisions for common positions to conserve time for critical moments.
- Mistake Reduction: In losses, tactical oversights or allowing opponent counterplay occur. Incorporating regular tactical training and reviewing critical mistakes post-game will help minimize these errors.
- Midgame Planning: Ensure you always have a plan, especially in open or complex positions. For instance, proactively improving piece activity and preventing opponent breakthroughs help maintain initiative.
Focus Recommendations
- Review and refine your less successful openings, perhaps experimenting with alternative lines or reinforcing thematic ideas with targeted study.
- Integrate puzzles focusing on tactics and calculation accuracy to reduce blunders in critical positions.
- Practice rapid decision-making scenarios to improve time management in blitz.
- Analyze your recent games—both wins and losses—to identify recurring patterns in both strong play and mistakes.
- Keep building on your momentum from the positive rating trend by setting specific goals such as increasing your win rate in particular openings.
Final Thoughts
Your dedication is evident and your recent performance is encouraging. By focusing on better opening preparation, sharper tactical skills, and improved time handling, you will be well positioned to raise your blitz performance further.
Keep enjoying your games and studying actively — consistent effort always pays off!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| prodiashvili | 64W / 71L / 7D | |
| gm_ilia | 10W / 21L / 4D | |
| allkorta | 10W / 17L / 0D | |
| kingilia | 11W / 8L / 0D | |
| vano1980 | 3W / 5L / 10D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2047 | 2008 | ||
| 2024 | 1902 | |||
| 2023 | 1784 | 2004 | ||
| 2022 | 1784 | 2092 | ||
| 2021 | 2086 | |||
| 2020 | 1830 | 1871 | ||
| 2019 | 1828 | 1660 | ||
| 2018 | 1741 | 1881 | 1660 | |
| 2017 | 1614 | 1795 | 1662 | |
| 2016 | 1620 | 1867 | 1501 | 1847 |
| 2015 | 1721 | 1893 | 1799 | |
| 2014 | 1776 | 1787 | 1351 | 1648 |
| 2013 | 1638 | 1794 | 1410 | 1353 |
| 2010 | 1300 | |||
| 2009 | 1274 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 18W / 11L / 1D | 20W / 12L / 1D | 69.0 |
| 2024 | 64W / 64L / 4D | 61W / 66L / 7D | 75.1 |
| 2023 | 39W / 38L / 4D | 37W / 35L / 8D | 81.1 |
| 2022 | 14W / 27L / 2D | 18W / 26L / 1D | 72.4 |
| 2021 | 17W / 6L / 3D | 14W / 11L / 2D | 74.8 |
| 2020 | 20W / 12L / 4D | 15W / 17L / 2D | 71.9 |
| 2019 | 1W / 10L / 0D | 1W / 11L / 0D | 7.7 |
| 2018 | 13W / 4L / 1D | 9W / 9L / 0D | 53.9 |
| 2017 | 27W / 31L / 4D | 20W / 34L / 4D | 55.5 |
| 2016 | 53W / 49L / 11D | 45W / 60L / 8D | 67.6 |
| 2015 | 83W / 60L / 21D | 73W / 66L / 24D | 68.2 |
| 2014 | 325W / 253L / 45D | 335W / 234L / 46D | 71.3 |
| 2013 | 132W / 111L / 12D | 110W / 128L / 14D | 73.6 |
| 2010 | 5W / 16L / 1D | 7W / 16L / 2D | 36.8 |
| 2009 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 28.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 136 | 62 | 67 | 7 | 45.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 72 | 31 | 38 | 3 | 43.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 55 | 33 | 21 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 53 | 22 | 28 | 3 | 41.5% |
| Modern | 46 | 23 | 20 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 41 | 20 | 19 | 2 | 48.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 35 | 14 | 19 | 2 | 40.0% |
| French Defense | 35 | 16 | 17 | 2 | 45.7% |
| English Opening | 34 | 12 | 20 | 2 | 35.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 32 | 14 | 15 | 3 | 43.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 30 | 19 | 10 | 1 | 63.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 23 | 10 | 12 | 1 | 43.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 21 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 52.4% |
| French Defense | 17 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Australian Defense | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 61.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 45.5% |
| English Opening | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 42 | 13 | 26 | 3 | 30.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 39 | 18 | 20 | 1 | 46.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 35 | 22 | 10 | 3 | 62.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 30 | 14 | 13 | 3 | 46.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 28 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 82.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 25 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Czech Defense | 24 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 54.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 23 | 16 | 7 | 0 | 69.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 23 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 52.2% |
| English Opening | 23 | 15 | 3 | 5 | 65.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Rare Line | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 4 |
| Losing | 22 | 0 |