Profile: Anysia Thomas (aka LamaChampetre)
Woman FIDE Master
Meet Anysia Thomas, the chess wizard known online as LamaChampetre. Awarded the prestigious title of Woman FIDE Master by FIDE, Anysia's chess journey is a thrilling rollercoaster of tactical brilliance, daring come-backs, and just a sprinkle of "how did that happen?!" moments.
Starting with a Blitz rating around 1500 back in 2019, Anysia skyrocketed to a peak of 2315 by early 2022. This master of fast-paced battles isn't just fast on the clock, but also incredibly resilient—boasting a remarkable 80% comeback rate after losing material. That's right, it's never over until LamaChampetre says so!
Her blitz style could be described as a fierce mix of patience and aggression, with games often lasting around 70 moves before sealing the deal—proof that Anysia embraces the endgame like a cozy chess blanket. Although early resignations are almost a nonexistent habit (less than 1%), she’s known to keep fighting until the very end.
Speaking of fighting spirit, her longest winning streak hits an impressive 15 games, but even the best have their off days, with a losing streak max of 13. The mental game is part of the adventure, and with a tilt factor of just 13 (because who has time to sulk?), Anysia keeps her cool even when pieces go rogue.
Fun fact: her absolute best time to play is outrageous—5 AM (yes, the crack-of-dawn club!)—with a near-perfect win rate at that hour. Early birds do indeed catch the rooks.
Game Highlights
Recent matches showcase her proficiency in Chess960, where unique opening positions often confuse opponents almost as much as Anysia's unpredictable style. Whether winning on time or by graceful resignation from adversaries, LamaChampetre’s tactical acumen shines. She’s mastered openings where most mortals tremble, earning a respectable 34% win rate in blitz games against a myriad of challengers.
Off the Board
When not busy outsmarting opponents online, Anysia enjoys the challenge of decoding opponent tendencies, boasting a 100% win record against some rivals (we won't name names to protect the humble). With a daily win rate north of 75%, she shows that slow and steady definitely wins some races.
To sum it all up: Anysia Thomas is an endgame enthusiast, tactical gladiator, and a dawn-breaker extraordinaire who takes her chess very seriously—except when she’s laughing at her own blunders. If you ever get a chance to play LamaChampetre, expect a battle as intense as it is entertaining.
Hi Anysia, here’s your personalised feedback 👋
What you’re already doing well
- Activity first: In many of your Chess960 wins you rapidly place pieces on active squares (e.g. the Nf5/Bg4 motifs against Aleksandra Tarnowska), forcing your opponent onto the back foot.
- Tactical alertness: You spot one-move shots such as Bxe6 / Nxe6+ or the exchange sacs that opened files against Ansumana Kamara. Your pattern recognition is growing.
- Flexible pawn play: You’re comfortable employing flank pawn levers (b-pawn, g-pawn, h-pawn) to gain space or provoke weaknesses—an excellent skill in 960 where centre files can be blocked.
Top priorities for the next few weeks
- Time management. Seven of the nine recent losses were “lost on time” in roughly equal or promising positions. Aim to reach move 20 with >40 % of your clock left.
• Use the “two-candidate-moves” rule: if neither is blundering material, pick one and keep the game moving.
• Practise 5 + 5 rather than 3 + 0 for a week to train quick evaluations without flagging. - King safety first in 960. Several early queen forays (e.g. 2.Qxb7? vs Alexey Reshetnikov) left your own king in the centre. Try a “castle by move 8” challenge in your next ten games.
- Central footprint. Games such as the loss to boris abrashkin show pawns advancing on the wing while the centre remained undefended. When unsure, choose a central pawn move (d- or e-pawn) before flank play.
Opening habits to refine
• Knights before bishops remains a reliable guideline, even in 960.
• After …c5 against your English structures, consider d4 earlier to avoid the isolated-pawn you often accept.
• Collect a short “response kit” against …f5 setups (common in 960): e4, quick castling and press on the e-file.
Tactical & calculation workout
Allocate 15 min/day to mixed motifs: discovered attacks, overloading, and back-rank tricks. Your games already feature these ideas; deliberate repetition will speed them up.
Endgame corner
You sometimes reach won endings yet still flag. Study the Lucena and Philidor rook-pawn endings. Knowing the drawing borders will reduce calculation time over the board.
Progress tracker
Best so far: 2315 (2022-02-22) – keep pushing!
Concrete action plan
- Play 20 games of 5 + 5 with a self-imposed 30-second think limit per move.
- Analyse (with engine off) one win and one loss each session, writing down why you spent >30 s on specific moves.
- Finish “100 Endgames You Must Know” chapters 1-4 this month.
- Review this key tactical mini-game whenever you need inspiration:
Keep enjoying the journey, and let me know whenever you need a deeper dive into a specific topic such as zugzwang or pawn majorities. Good luck in your next session! 🚀
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Piotr Sygulski | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Paul Rohwer | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Amani Alazmi | 1W / 2L / 1D | View |
| Ana Kuchava | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Leonel Alejandro Amato | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| hs03935 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| r1ck-gr1mes | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Svitlana Demchenko | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| widowmaker122 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ashwin-2302 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| akanga001 | 5W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| Julian Estrada | 1W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| Marcel Winkels | 4W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| Sergei Ljukin | 0W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| Svetlana Vifleemskaia | 1W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2111 | 1512 | ||
| 2024 | 2069 | 2253 | ||
| 2023 | 2230 | |||
| 2022 | 2145 | |||
| 2021 | 2266 | 1943 | 2163 | |
| 2020 | 2101 | 2233 | ||
| 2019 | 1960 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17W / 50L / 3D | 22W / 43L / 5D | 72.4 |
| 2024 | 32W / 80L / 7D | 35W / 79L / 7D | 75.5 |
| 2023 | 23W / 42L / 2D | 23W / 45L / 3D | 73.0 |
| 2022 | 30W / 71L / 7D | 35W / 71L / 16D | 83.0 |
| 2021 | 86W / 115L / 17D | 83W / 134L / 16D | 77.6 |
| 2020 | 34W / 64L / 7D | 33W / 60L / 4D | 77.4 |
| 2019 | 38W / 9L / 1D | 38W / 11L / 2D | 73.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 16.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Modern Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 72 | 30 | 36 | 6 | 41.7% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 69 | 19 | 45 | 5 | 27.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 68 | 22 | 40 | 6 | 32.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 44 | 24 | 19 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 41 | 18 | 23 | 0 | 43.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 39 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 30.8% |
| Australian Defense | 34 | 15 | 18 | 1 | 44.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 33 | 11 | 22 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 32 | 11 | 20 | 1 | 34.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 32 | 12 | 19 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 2 |