Lamm-d-az-roue: The Sicilian Sorcerer
Emerging from the mists of online chess realms since 2012, Lamm-d-az-roue has steadily crafted a reputation as a formidable blitz wizard, specializing in the labyrinthine Sicilian Defense and its many spicy variations. With a peak blitz rating nudging the magical 2500 mark in 2025, this player dances through positions where many would fear to tread, turning complex theoretical lines into personal playgrounds.
Our hero’s arsenal is well-stocked: from the sly French Variation of the Sicilian to the aggressive Open Dragon Fianchetto, and even the occasionally intimidating Old Sicilian. When wielding the White pieces, Lamm-d-az-roue favors solid yet flexible moves like e4 and Nc3, often steering games into labyrinths where tactical fireworks and strategic subtleties coexist.
Known for an average win length of 74 moves and a penchant for deep, steady preparation (median depth around 6!), Lamm-d-az-roue is the kind of player who doesn’t just rush to checkmate—they simmer the opponent’s hopes with moves that gradually tighten the noose. And if you manage to snatch a piece, don’t expect an easy win; their 46% win rate after losing a piece hints at a fierce fighting spirit that makes comebacks a regular feature.
While their tactical prowess is impressive, Lamm-d-az-roue’s true psychological strength lies in resilience—boasting an astonishing 86% comeback rate, proving that setbacks are just warm-ups for a roaring return. Though occasionally tilting (we all do), even their tilt factor of 11 can’t dissuade this warrior from forging ahead.
Their preferred battlefield? The blitz arena, where lightning-fast decisions are king. And boy, do they deliver — over 19,000 wins in blitz against nearly 10,000 losses and 2,225 draws! When the clock is ticking, Lamm-d-az-roue’s techniques come alive, often leading to thrilling victories by resignation or checkmate.
Off the board, this player maintains a fierce rivalry with various opponents but holds particularly impressive records against trainingbg81 and smyslovsfan. Popular openings show a fondness for tactical melee mixed with positional nuance — a sprinkle of Alapin Sicilian here, an injection of Vienna Game there — enough to keep opponents guessing and on their toes.
In their own words, "If you aren't plotting, you are loosing faster than you can blink!" And if speed chess had a personality, it would be Lamm-d-az-roue: sharp, relentless, and always a little bit unpredictable. A true force of nature on the checkered battlefield.
Notable Recent Games
Just recently, Lamm-d-az-roue demonstrated surgical precision winning against mazetas123 by resignation in a sharp Sicilian Open Dragon Fianchetto variation, showing mastery in positional pressures and endgame finesse.
Another highlight is a sleek checkmate delivered to kaxaberkiziria in the Closed Sicilian Defense, reminding everyone why this player’s blitz games are a spectacle.
Peak Ratings
- Blitz: 2505 (February 2025)
- Rapid: 2454 (June 2024)
- Bullet: 2364 (January 2023)
- Daily: 1089 (June 2013)
Playing Style & Personality
- Early resignation rate is practically nonexistent; Lamm-d-az-roue fights until every move counts.
- Endgames are a frequent battlefield making up about 75% of games—where real champions are made.
- Thrives under pressure with an extremely high comeback rate of 86%!
- Sometimes tilts like the rest of us mere mortals, but uses that fire to fuel wins.
- Has a wide strategic range, utilizing openings that favor both tactical bursts and positional understandings.
Stay tuned, because this chess whirlwind is just getting started!
Overview and approach for your blitz play
You’ve shown willingness to enter sharp, tactical lines and to seek activity with active piece play. In blitz, balancing solid development with concrete plans is key, especially against aggressive opponents who aim to unbalance the position quickly. The next improvement steps focus on stabilizing your openings, sharpening your middlegame plans, and strengthening endgame technique under time pressure.
What you did well
- Consistent piece activity after solid development. When you could, you activated rooks and centralized pieces to pressure key files and diagonals.
- Good willingness to castle and coordinate the king safety with your rooks in the middle game, which helped you create attacking chances or simplify to favorable endgames.
- Trade-offs that led to favorable simplified positions in some games, showing you can convert advantages when you keep the pawn structure and piece coordination intact.
Areas to improve
- Time management and plan formation. In blitz, spend a few extra seconds early to form a clear plan (or a couple of candidate plans) rather than reacting move-to-move. This helps avoid sudden time pressure and impulsive decisions later in the game.
- King safety and back-rank awareness. Several losses in blitz come from overreaching attacks or neglecting back-rank threats. Before initiating tactical trades or pawn storms, confirm king safety and whether your opponent has a back-rank or sudden counterplay.
- Endgame readiness. When the position simplifies to rooks and pawns, focusing on activating your rook, creating or stopping passed pawns, and knowing the basic rook endgame principles (e.g., rook behind passed pawns, using the opposition) will help convert more positions in your favor.
- Opening discipline and plan. Your recent games feature English Four Knights themes. Develop a simple opening plan you can repeat confidently and translate into a middlegame plan (e.g., control of central squares, timely c-pawn breaks, or specific piece maneuvers) so you don’t get stuck in move-by-move guessing under time pressure.
- Guard against overambitious lines when tempo is tight. In blitz, it’s often better to choose solid, forcing moves that keep the position balanced rather than diving into complex tactical melees that require long calculations.
Opening and middlegame patterns to study
Given your recent games, focus on these ideas to improve consistency in blitz:
- English Opening family ideas: develop with a plan, keep the pawn structure flexible, and avoid weakening your king’s position without a concrete compensation.
- Closed structures and quick central breaks: practice timely c-pawn or d-pawn breaks to open lines for your rooks and queen, while keeping the king safe.
- Back-rank safety: learn common motifs to avoid back-rank weaknesses, such as ensuring rooks are not left undefended on the back rank and that the king has an escape square or a safe castling choice.
Drills and practice plan
- Daily tactical warm-up (10-15 minutes): focus on patterns like forks, pins, skewers, back-rank mates, and common mating motifs. Use short puzzles to train quick recognition under time pressure.
- Opening comfort (2-3 times per week, 20-30 minutes): pick one or two lines in your preferred openings (e.g., English Four Knights) and drill the typical middlegame plans and common pawn structures. Build a small repertoire that you can execute confidently in blitz.
- Endgame effort (1-2 times per week, 15-20 minutes): practice rook endgames and basic king-and-pawn endings. Learn practical techniques like “activate the king,” “activate the rook behind passed pawns,” and the rule of three or four active pawns on one side.
- Game review routine (after each blitz session): spend 10 minutes reviewing your win and loss games. Identify one decision you were uncertain about, one time-pressure moment, and one improvement you could apply next game.
Next steps
If you’d like, I can propose a 2-week or 4-week, beat-by-beat study plan tailored to your current openings and typical opponents. You can share more recent games or PGNs to drill specific moments (e.g., back-rank traps, a frequent middlegame plan, or a challenging endgame) and we’ll tailor the practice accordingly.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Aniceto Sarmiento | 3W / 5L / 0D | |
| Christian Toth | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| Dragan Popadic | 5W / 11L / 0D | |
| Juan Manuel Galvan | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| oldfreezeham | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| suz99 | 5W / 2L / 0D | |
| keehlmiheal | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| vladom2019 | 4W / 4L / 1D | |
| subguru | 0W / 0L / 2D | |
| vmezentsev | 1W / 3L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| michael124667 | 13W / 23L / 5D | |
| Trainingbg81 | 19W / 12L / 4D | |
| Dirceu Viana | 20W / 10L / 3D | |
| Tom Borvander | 17W / 11L / 5D | |
| malimukes | 19W / 7L / 6D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2290 | 2436 | 2469 | 2472 |
| 2024 | 2353 | 2368 | ||
| 2023 | 2237 | 2249 | 2386 | |
| 2022 | 2297 | 2148 | 2334 | |
| 2021 | 2321 | 2256 | 2223 | |
| 2020 | 2110 | 2127 | 2386 | |
| 2019 | 1512 | 2107 | 1766 | |
| 2016 | 2011 | |||
| 2015 | 1710 | 1798 | ||
| 2014 | 1670 | 1972 | ||
| 2013 | 1611 | 1759 | 1089 | |
| 2012 | 1423 | 1748 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 322W / 293L / 77D | 328W / 284L / 68D | 78.3 |
| 2024 | 518W / 382L / 109D | 446W / 437L / 123D | 78.3 |
| 2023 | 710W / 474L / 124D | 611W / 542L / 140D | 76.9 |
| 2022 | 642W / 432L / 109D | 572W / 479L / 108D | 74.3 |
| 2021 | 619W / 446L / 102D | 568W / 492L / 112D | 76.2 |
| 2020 | 722W / 534L / 126D | 690W / 594L / 127D | 72.5 |
| 2019 | 412W / 299L / 70D | 386W / 331L / 73D | 70.9 |
| 2016 | 76W / 35L / 7D | 62W / 47L / 6D | 72.3 |
| 2015 | 527W / 461L / 109D | 511W / 487L / 90D | 73.9 |
| 2014 | 725W / 670L / 212D | 660W / 781L / 164D | 76.5 |
| 2013 | 598W / 578L / 136D | 533W / 619L / 150D | 75.2 |
| 2012 | 227W / 194L / 36D | 187W / 241L / 34D | 72.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 663 | 305 | 302 | 56 | 46.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 614 | 286 | 269 | 59 | 46.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 589 | 308 | 230 | 51 | 52.3% |
| French Defense | 569 | 296 | 223 | 50 | 52.0% |
| Australian Defense | 511 | 247 | 208 | 56 | 48.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 508 | 235 | 209 | 64 | 46.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 480 | 236 | 189 | 55 | 49.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 480 | 221 | 218 | 41 | 46.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 465 | 239 | 179 | 47 | 51.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 407 | 188 | 170 | 49 | 46.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 30 | 14 | 14 | 2 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 28 | 10 | 13 | 5 | 35.7% |
| Bishop's Opening: 3.d3 | 26 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 57.7% |
| Bishop's Opening | 25 | 15 | 8 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 24 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 37.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 23 | 10 | 11 | 2 | 43.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 20 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 65.0% |
| French Defense | 19 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 47.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 19 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 52.6% |
| Old Indian Defense: Duz-Khotimirsky Variation | 19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 52.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 54 | 36 | 16 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 48 | 32 | 15 | 1 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Attack | 26 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 53.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 23 | 16 | 7 | 0 | 69.6% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 13 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 69.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Czech Defense | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 30.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 1 |