Logman Guliev - International Master of Chess
Meet Logman Guliev, also known in the chess world as Logman74. An International Master titled by FIDE, Logman is a force to be reckoned with on the 64 squares, blending deep strategy with a dash of flair and occasional cheeky gambits. His blitz rating peaked at a blistering 2632 in 2023, proving his speed and precision under fire. If you blink, you might just miss his tactical fireworks!
Style & Stats
Famous for his stubbornness on the board, Logman’s average game length hints at his love for the long haul—averaging over 73 moves per win and even more moves in losses. White pieces? He boasts a respectable 44.17% win rate, and with black, he doesn’t back down easily at 39.51%. His psychological resilience is commendable too, with a comeback rate over 91% and a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece—proof that even when the chips are down, Logman’s still in the game.
Fast & Furious
When it comes to rapid and bullet chess, Logman74 thrives on adrenaline. His blitz and bullet records boast thousands of games played, with over 500 wins in bullet alone and a win rate hovering above 40% despite facing thousands of games. If you want a lesson in fast thinking and quick tactics, watching Logman’s bullet games might just make your head spin (in a good way).
Random Quirks
Did you know? Logman is most deadly between the hours of 11 PM and midnight, boasting a candid 55.77% win rate—perhaps the midnight hour unlocks some secret chess sorcery! His longest winning streak? A solid 11 games, which is long enough to make any opponent reconsider their life choices.
Social & Opponents
Over the years, Logman has tangled most often with gmdong69 and ucitelot, with fierce battles tallying over 50 clashes each. Even so, he’s kept his sense of humor and never shies away from a challenge—even if it means a few losses and occasional tilt (13 on the tilt factor, which means he stays cool... mostly).
Whether it’s a quick game at dawn or a marathon blitz session, Logman Guliev remains a beloved and respected figure in the chess community, proving that brains, resilience, and a bit of wit make the perfect recipe for chess mastery.
Overall Performance Insights
Logman Guliev, your recent games show solid performance with a strength adjusted win rate of approximately 50%. Your rating has experienced some fluctuations, with a modest decline of 28 points in the last month, despite a positive slope indicating a stable or slightly improving form recently. Over the longer term (3 to 6 months), you have demonstrated substantial growth with rating increases of 114 and 83 points respectively. This suggests that while short-term setbacks occur, your overall trajectory remains on an upward path.
Highlights from Recent Wins
- Opening repertoire: You have success in a variety of openings including the Caro-Kann Defense and Queen's Gambit Declined Exchange Variation. Your handling of the Two Knights Attack against the Caro-Kann has been particularly effective.
- Middle game: Your ability to create critical tension points and exploit opponent's inaccuracies, especially in tactical positions, is a strength. For example, you capitalized well on minor piece activity and pawn structure weaknesses.
- Endgame technique: Your endgame play, including promoting passed pawns and coordinating pieces to restrict the opponent, has won you several technical victories.
- Time management: Winning on time and maintaining good clock awareness has been a valuable asset in your blitz games.
Learning Points from Recent Losses
- Opening challenges: In some recent losses, notably against the Scandinavian Defense and certain Sicilian variations, opponents gained early initiative. Review the key moments in these opening lines to bolster your response and avoid falling into passive positions.
- Middlegame tactics: Some defeats came from tactical oversights or allowing opponent's key piece to invade your territory. Enhance your tactical vigilance, especially regarding pawn breaks and piece coordination.
- Endgame resilience: In a few losses, the endgame proved difficult, especially under time pressure. Work on simplified position technique and maintaining composure during high-pressure moments.
- Time pressure: A couple of games ended with losses on time. Practicing time management strategies, such as quicker decision making in less critical moves, will help avoid these outcomes.
Suggestions for Improvement
To continue your progress and address recent challenges, consider the following:
- Deepen your opening study, focusing on lines where losses occurred, to reduce early disadvantages.
- Integrate tactical puzzle training targeting motifs commonly arising in your games, like pins, forks, and discovered attacks.
- Practice endgame fundamentals regularly to improve confidence in simplified positions and critical moments.
- Analyze your blitz games to identify recurring time management mistakes and develop better clock handling habits.
Next Steps
Keep up the positive momentum by balancing intensive training with practical game experience. Reviewing your recent wins and losses via your%20game%20archives can reveal important patterns and help you formulate a plan tailored to strengthen your play in specific phases of the game.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rafalbrc | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| GMDong69 | 35W / 22L / 0D | View Games |
| Zvonko Stanojoski | 12W / 32L / 7D | View Games |
| Socrates | 31W / 10L / 4D | View Games |
| Steve Berger | 19W / 17L / 7D | View Games |
| Alan Stein | 20W / 16L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2427 | 2567 | ||
| 2024 | 2384 | 2482 | ||
| 2023 | 2500 | 2493 | 2296 | |
| 2022 | 2279 | 2458 | 2229 | |
| 2021 | 2292 | 2454 | 2348 | |
| 2020 | 2131 | 2414 | 2102 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 298W / 294L / 24D | 253W / 331L / 35D | 73.3 |
| 2024 | 68W / 92L / 6D | 66W / 89L / 12D | 75.4 |
| 2023 | 370W / 344L / 45D | 302W / 408L / 53D | 78.0 |
| 2022 | 148W / 156L / 27D | 122W / 187L / 26D | 78.6 |
| 2021 | 570W / 683L / 90D | 538W / 714L / 92D | 76.2 |
| 2020 | 253W / 285L / 53D | 239W / 322L / 35D | 78.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 107 | 50 | 53 | 4 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 89 | 44 | 39 | 6 | 49.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 87 | 35 | 49 | 3 | 40.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 54 | 22 | 27 | 5 | 40.7% |
| Czech Defense | 53 | 20 | 32 | 1 | 37.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 51 | 19 | 29 | 3 | 37.2% |
| Modern | 50 | 29 | 19 | 2 | 58.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 49 | 23 | 22 | 4 | 46.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 46 | 29 | 15 | 2 | 63.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 46 | 20 | 23 | 3 | 43.5% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 157 | 65 | 76 | 16 | 41.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 142 | 61 | 75 | 6 | 43.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 131 | 61 | 60 | 10 | 46.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 126 | 48 | 74 | 4 | 38.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 123 | 58 | 55 | 10 | 47.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation | 109 | 42 | 59 | 8 | 38.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 105 | 49 | 47 | 9 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 100 | 44 | 51 | 5 | 44.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 99 | 33 | 60 | 6 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 96 | 43 | 44 | 9 | 44.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 1 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |