Loomju: A Dynamic Chess Talent
Loomju’s journey in chess is a story of continual growth and remarkable resilience. From early days marked by modest ratings, he has steadily transformed his game across multiple time controls. In recent years, his blitz rating soared from 1530 in 2022 to an impressive 1729 in 2024, while his rapid and bullet performances have also seen substantial progress. This upward trajectory reflects his relentless pursuit of excellence and an evolving style that adapts to the rigors of fast-paced play.
Known for his deep preparation and versatility, Loomju has developed an expansive opening repertoire. Whether it’s the intricacies of the Caro Kann Defense or exploring nuanced lines in the Italian Game and Scandinavian Defense, he demonstrates a robust understanding of classic and modern chess strategies. His record shows a predilection for complex positions where tactical insight and solid positional play intermingle.
His playing style underscores both creative endgame prowess and a disciplined approach in the opening and middlegame phases. With an endgame frequency reaching over 65%, Loomju consistently proves that precise calculation and tactical awareness are the hallmarks of his play. His comeback rate of more than 80% and perfection in converting games after material setbacks further illustrate his mental fortitude and resilience under pressure.
Beyond raw ratings and game results, Loomju’s performance data offers intriguing insights. His win rate fluctuates with the time of day, peaking in the early hours when his concentration is at its best. Whether facing familiar challengers or new opponents, his analytical approach and psychological steadiness—evidenced by a low tilt factor—help him secure critical wins.
In summary, Loomju emerges as a well-rounded competitor whose dedication, strategic depth, and evolving style make him a noteworthy figure in the chess community. His balanced achievements across blitz, rapid, bullet, and daily formats exemplify a modern chess player who thrives under diverse conditions, consistently raising his game and inspiring others to do the same.
Hi loomju – personalised training feedback
Congratulations on sustaining a solid rapid rating around 1700 (1779 (2025-09-04)). Your games show bold tactics and a growing understanding of critical pawn breaks. Below are concrete points to reinforce what is working and to patch the leaks that keep showing up.
1. Opening phase
- White vs Sicilian. In the recent loss to kkwang1 (Taimanov) you chased a
and fell behind in development. Adopt the rule “connect rooks before collecting loose pawns.” Build a repertoire line you trust (6.Be3/Be2 or 6.g3) and study one master game per day for a week. - Black choices. Your Caro-Kann and French scores are positive, but several defeats featured early …g5/…h5. Before committing flank pawns, ask “Which piece is undeveloped?” and prioritise that move instead.
2. Middlegame habits
- Tactical eye. The mating sequence 21…Qxf2⁺ 22.Kh1 Qxg2# shows sharp calculation. Continue daily puzzle rush but include slow, deep puzzles to balance speed with accuracy.
- Prophylaxis. A recurring problem is neglecting the opponent’s counter-play (e.g., allowing 25.Nf5⁺ in your loss). Add a quick “opponent’s threat?” checkpoint to every move. See Prophylaxis.
- Pawn breaks. You time …d5 and …c5 well; now focus on evaluating the resulting structure. After each game, freeze at the moment you break and ask: “Was the position better, equal, or worse five moves later?”
3. Endgame technique
- Several wins finished after the opponent disconnected rather than through clean technique (FelipeCain game). Drill basic rook endings (Philidor, Lucena) until you can set them up in under 30 seconds.
- When clearly winning, look for piece trades that simplify; don’t cling to the attack if a won ending is available.
4. Time management
Clock usage graphs (
) show heavy front-loading: you often have < 2 minutes by move 25. Practise the 30-30-40 rule: 30 % of your time for the first 15 moves, 30 % for the next 15, leaving 40 % for conversion.5. Targeted homework
- Annotate the critical phase of your Taimanov loss without an engine, then compare.
- Create a flash-card pack of typical Sicilian tactics: Nxb5, Bxe6⁺, exchange sac on c3, etc.
- Once a week, analyse one of your own wins to find missed opportunities; this prevents overconfidence.
Progress tracker
Keep nurturing your tactical flair, add a layer of prophylactic thinking, and smoother endgame technique will carry you to the next milestone. Good luck with your training, and feel free to share your next batch of games!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| JalexU | 11W / 2L / 0D | |
| jelynfish | 3W / 1L / 1D | |
| hollowtheweeb | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| beez45 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| evgeny_bell | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1779 | 939 | ||
| 2024 | 1729 | 1606 | ||
| 2023 | 1602 | 1606 | 1606 | 939 |
| 2022 | 1310 | 1530 | 1363 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4W / 1L / 0D | 4W / 0L / 1D | 77.2 |
| 2024 | 34W / 30L / 4D | 37W / 27L / 6D | 69.5 |
| 2023 | 165W / 134L / 17D | 174W / 131L / 18D | 66.7 |
| 2022 | 74W / 31L / 4D | 97W / 15L / 0D | 62.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 21 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fegatello Attack, Leonhardt Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: 3.d3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 154 | 90 | 55 | 9 | 58.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 60 | 33 | 24 | 3 | 55.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 45 | 21 | 22 | 2 | 46.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 29 | 17 | 11 | 1 | 58.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 27 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 59.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 22 | 7 | 13 | 2 | 31.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 22 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 72.7% |
| Czech Defense | 18 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 17 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 47.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 16 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 43.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 43 | 29 | 13 | 1 | 67.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 15 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 80.0% |
| French Defense | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 61.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 12 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 11 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 27.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Modern | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Czech Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 6 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |