Paul Lynch - The Chess.com Crusader
Also known in the chess realm as losscause, Paul Lynch has been a steadfast warrior on the 64 squares since at least 2012. His journey is a fascinating blend of tactical skirmishes, strategic gambits, and the occasional hilarious misstep—because, hey, even chess champs sometimes lose on time!
Rating Rollercoaster
Paul has seen his rating climb and dip across all major time controls, with peak bullet rating hitting 1544 way back in January 2012, blitz soaring to 1537 in May 2020, and daily reaching a royal 2001 in early 2013. Not to be outdone, his rapid rating recently touched a personal best of 1421 in November 2024. If chess ratings were a rollercoaster, Paul's definitely earned a front-row seat with some thrilling loops and drops.
Favorite Battles and Opening Moves
Paul favors solid and strategic openings like the Queen's Pawn Opening - Zukertort Variation and the trusty Caro Kann Defense, boasting win rates around the 55-58% range—a respectable record for any player brave enough to tango with these classic defenses. The Owens Defense also shines in his repertoire with almost a 60% success rate in bullet games.
A Tactical Mind with a Fondness for Comebacks
With an impressive 81% comeback rate, Paul is the kind of player who refuses to quit after losing material. If you take one of his pieces, expect him to fight back hard—his win rate after losing a piece is a respectable 47%. This guy doesn't just survive; he thrives under pressure.
Clock Management: Friend or Foe?
Known to win some games on time, Paul’s most recent victories sometimes come courtesy of the clock rather than checkmate, proving he’s both a speedster and a strategist. Notably, in a 2025 live bullet game, he secured a win on time against jamezm79 in a complicated middlegame.
The Human Side of the Board
Paul's tilt factor stands at 19, suggesting he has his moments of emotional chess rollercoaster, but hey, who doesn’t? His best time to play? The early bird gets the win at 6 AM, where his win rates peak.
Fun Facts & Stats
- Longest winning streak: 9 games
- Longest losing streak: 19 games—because sometimes, the pawns just gang up!
- Average moves per win: ~65, proving patience pays off
- Favorite day for victories: Thursday with a 53.75% win rate
Summary
Paul Lynch is not your average chess player; he’s a seasoned battler with a diverse opening repertoire, a resilient spirit, and a knack for snatching victory just in the nick of time—sometimes literally on the clock. Whether blitzing through attacks or patiently maneuvering in daily games, Paul’s passion for chess is unmistakable and his online presence a tale of perseverance, strategy, and occasional clock-induced triumphs.
In other words, if you see losscause online, beware—he might just turn your king's day into a nightmare or lose his own on time... either way, you're in for an entertaining game!
Quick summary for Paul Lynch
Nice upward trend — your rating has been moving up quickly recently, and your win-rate versus similarly-rated opponents is healthy. You’re doing many small things well: active piece play, tactical awareness in the middlegame, and a willingness to simplify when the position favors you. Below I walk through the most recent decisive games and give focused, practical next steps.
Recent win — highlights & takeaways
Opponent: cadude2020 — Opening: Three Knights Opening
Replay the final phase:
What you did well
- You used aggressive knight jumps to provoke pawn weaknesses — the move that forced the doubled f-pawns was good practical play. You traded when the structure favored you and simplified into a winning sequence.
- You kept the initiative after minor exchanges and converted with clear threats (king safety and active pieces forced favorable trades).
- Time management was steady — you didn’t burn time in the key tactical phase.
What to polish
- When you accept structural damage (doubled/isolated pawns), make a short plan for piece activity and king safety immediately after — you did this well in this game but try to make that plan automatic.
- Practice spotting the moment to trade queens or heavy pieces: trades are good when they remove counterplay and lead to simpler winning conversion.
Most instructive loss — what to learn
Opponent: Richard Shtivelband — Opening context: London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation
Replay the critical sequence:
Key mistakes and patterns
- Move-order/timing: after Black showed the queen on b6/b4, your queen move to c1 made tactical ideas like cxd4 and a later pawn advance attractive. In short: the queen became active while your pieces were underdeveloped.
- You allowed a strong pawn push (d4) that closed the center and created a tactical fork / invasion point. That pawn push was decisive because your pieces were not coordinated to meet it.
- Watch for exposed back-rank and loose-square tactics when the opponent’s queen is already active on your side of the board.
Practical fixes
- Before playing a quiet queen move (Qc1), ask: “Does this allow enemy queen checks or central pawn breaks?” If yes, consider development (Nc3, a3, or c3) first.
- When the opponent’s queen is targeting b2/d4, prioritize closing those squares or trading when safe — simple moves like Nc3 or c3 often stop the tactics.
- Run a quick tactical check before each move: any forks, pins, checks, or discovered attacks? Make that a habit for the first 10 moves of the opening.
Recurring themes I see
- You excel at active piece play and converting tactical advantages — keep using knight outposts and forcing pawn structure weaknesses in the opponent’s camp.
- Vulnerability: queen invasions and sudden pawn breaks in the center (especially when your pieces are undeveloped) have cost you games. This is a move-order / prophylaxis issue more than pure calculation.
- Your opening choices show strengths (good results vs Sicilian and Three Knights). Double down on a small practical repertoire so you reach playable middlegames more often.
Targeted 4-week training plan (practical, 3–5 sessions/week)
- Daily tactics — 15 minutes. Focus on forks, queen tactics, and pawn breaks. Drill pattern recognition so you stop the pawn push or queen check tricks quickly.
- Two coached reviews per week — pick one win and one loss. For each: find the one turning move (5–10 minutes) and write the short note: “what I missed” and “what I should have done.”
- Opening maintenance — 2× 20-minute sessions weekly. Solidify 2–3 move orders in your main lines: e.g. Three Knights Opening and London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation. Work on move-order pitfalls (when to play Nc3, c3, Qc1, etc.).
- Endgame basics — 1× weekly 20–30 minutes: king+pawn and basic rook endings. Simplification must be safe — you traded into a favorable endgame in your win; learn the patterns to do it reliably.
- Play and reflect — play 8–12 rapid games this block and force yourself to do a 3-minute post-mortem on every decisive game: identify the decisive mistake or best idea.
Concrete checklist for your next session
- Before every move in the opening: check for opponent queen checks and central pawn breaks (5-second habit).
- If you choose to accept doubled pawns, write a one-line plan: “activate rook, open file, swap queens” — then follow it.
- Spend one session learning why Nc3 vs Qb4+ matters: practice the move order in 5 blitz games focusing only on that setup.
- Do 50 tactics focused on queen forks / discovery patterns this week.
Small encouragement + next step
You’re trending up quickly (+171 recent jump). Keep the momentum: focus on fixing the few recurring move-order holes and keep your tactical routine sharp. If you want, send me one of your annotated games (a short note on the turning move) and I’ll give a focused follow-up plan for that exact type of position.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| juldar123 | 6W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| midorigaoka | 2W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| migalito | 7W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| patience2018 | 3W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| unpluggedsherry | 2W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 955 | |||
| 2024 | 941 | 1265 | 1421 | |
| 2022 | 1306 | |||
| 2021 | 1418 | 1250 | ||
| 2020 | 1270 | 1088 | ||
| 2019 | 1314 | |||
| 2017 | 1230 | 1446 | ||
| 2016 | 1249 | 1409 | 1250 | 1774 |
| 2015 | 1237 | 1312 | 1865 | |
| 2014 | 1206 | 1356 | 1886 | |
| 2013 | 1208 | 1395 | 1100 | 1871 |
| 2012 | 1267 | 1452 | 1200 | 1961 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 271W / 275L / 30D | 278W / 273L / 28D | 62.8 |
| 2024 | 220W / 219L / 22D | 212W / 223L / 23D | 63.5 |
| 2022 | 0W / 2L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 44.0 |
| 2021 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 54.7 |
| 2020 | 1W / 4L / 0D | 2W / 2L / 0D | 48.8 |
| 2019 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 46.0 |
| 2017 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 49.0 |
| 2016 | 29W / 27L / 2D | 30W / 28L / 2D | 63.9 |
| 2015 | 36W / 30L / 5D | 28W / 36L / 5D | 62.8 |
| 2014 | 107W / 74L / 14D | 94W / 68L / 21D | 64.3 |
| 2013 | 188W / 146L / 12D | 182W / 157L / 18D | 61.0 |
| 2012 | 185W / 147L / 25D | 189W / 159L / 28D | 68.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 79 | 46 | 28 | 5 | 58.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 49 | 23 | 23 | 3 | 46.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 22 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 22 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 81.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 20 | 7 | 12 | 1 | 35.0% |
| Australian Defense | 19 | 7 | 12 | 0 | 36.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 64.7% |
| Döry Defense | 16 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 43.8% |
| Slav Defense | 15 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 53.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 536 | 255 | 248 | 33 | 47.6% |
| French Defense | 214 | 106 | 97 | 11 | 49.5% |
| Australian Defense | 189 | 87 | 97 | 5 | 46.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 184 | 97 | 77 | 10 | 52.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 184 | 98 | 81 | 5 | 53.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 141 | 62 | 76 | 3 | 44.0% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 98 | 52 | 41 | 5 | 53.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 97 | 39 | 55 | 3 | 40.2% |
| Slav Defense | 87 | 47 | 35 | 5 | 54.0% |
| Döry Defense | 79 | 32 | 39 | 8 | 40.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 32 | 21 | 9 | 2 | 65.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 20 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 45.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 28.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 13 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 46.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Scotch Game | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| East Indian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 9 | 0 |
| Losing | 19 | 1 |