Ladia Jirasek (lrjchess)
International Master of the 64 Squares
Meet Ladia Jirasek, the International Master who dances effortlessly on the chessboard, juggling pawns, knights, and rooks as if they were mere dance partners. Known online as lrjchess, Ladia's journey from humble beginnings to titleholder is nothing short of a chess epic.
Since bursting onto the scene in 2018 with a blitz rating of 2157, Ladia has constantly pushed the envelope — scaling peaks up to a blistering 2773 in blitz and mastering every time control from bullet to rapid. Blitz? A ruthless battlefield where their win rate hovers over 53%, and a bullet monster boasting more than 4400 wins! If speed chess were an Olympic sport, Ladia would be draped in gold with a smug smile.
Favorite openings remain top secret (a little mystery suits an IM), but one thing’s clear: Ladia's style is marathon-like endurance with an average game length over 75 moves and an endgame frequency near 77%. When others tire, Ladia's tactical awareness shines brightly — with a stunning 85% comeback rate and a 98% win rate once down a piece. Losing a piece? Pfft, not a setback but a setup for a dramatic strike back.
Off the board, Ladia enjoys a current winning streak of 3 games, with a longest streak of 25. Talk about momentum! Avoiding early resignations at a low 3.4%, Ladia battles till the very last move — no quitters here.
Matchups? Ladia's equal parts gracious and fierce, having bested some longtime rivals 100%, while others continue to prove challenging. But if you want to catch Ladia off-guard, pick an opening day between 1 PM and 4 PM—they're known to be a bit less lethal around lunchtime (maybe hungry?).
In summary: Ladia Jirasek is not just a player, but a chess phenomenon — mixing strategic endurance, tactical wizardry, and an appetite for victory that keeps fans on the edge of their seats. Whether you're a casual fan or a fellow competitor, watching lrjchess play is a masterclass in competitive spirit and chess prowess.
Recent Blitz Game Performance
Ladia, your recent blitz games show strong foundational skills, with several wins against high-rated players and a solid opening repertoire. Your ability to capitalize on opponent errors, especially in the middle-to-late game, reflects good tactical awareness and calculation. You're comfortable with dynamic positions, particularly in openings like the Panov-Fianchetto Defense and Scandinavian Defense, where you maintain a generally positive win rate.
However, losses in some recent games indicate room for improvement in transition phases and defensive resilience, which can be critical in blitz time controls.
Strengths to Build On
- Opening Preparation: Your results with the Scandinavian Defense (56% win rate) and Rapport-Jobava System (60% win rate) demonstrate strong and consistent opening knowledge. You effectively reach playable positions out of the opening.
- Tactical Awareness: You often convert small advantages tactically, as seen where you use pins, forks, and discovered attacks well during the game transitions.
- Endgame Technique: Some wins show efficient technique pushing passed minor and material advantages with calm precision.
- Adaptability: You handle dynamic pawn structures and complex middle games, e.g., engaging in close fights in the Scandinavian Defense and Panov variations.
Areas for Improvement
- Transition to Middlegame: Some losses stem from difficulties transitioning smoothly from opening to middlegame. Focus on understanding key strategic plans in your openings beyond initial moves to maintain initiative.
- Positional Defense: Strengthen your defensive skills, particularly anticipating opponent’s threats and solidifying your king safety early in complex positions to reduce tactical vulnerabilities.
- Time Management: Blitz games demand quick and accurate decisions; practice managing clock pressure better to avoid hurried errors in critical moments.
- Handling Lower Win Rate Openings: Variations like the Sicilian Defense Alapin have sub-45% win rates. Consider revisiting your repertoire there with new ideas or alternatives that better suit your style.
- Resilience During Downtrends: The recent 1-month rating drop and negative trend suggest a need for psychological resilience and possibly relaxing your play to avoid frustration-driven mistakes.
Long-Term Development Suggestions
Given your rating history and recent trends:
- Review your recent games focusing on losses and draws to find recurring strategic or tactical themes leading to difficulties.
- Incorporate consistent tactical drills mixed with endgame studies to sharpen calculation and simplify winning positions efficiently.
- Experiment with deeper study of your most successful openings, like the Scandinavian Defense, to reinforce your best strengths.
- Address psychological aspects of blitz by setting goals per game (e.g., focus on quality decisions over result) to sustain motivation and positive mindset.
- Try slower time controls occasionally to allow exploration of ideas and reduce pressure, then transfer refined skills back to blitz.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| D1sintegrator | 2W / 4L / 0D | |
| princewhowasntking | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| kubikkek | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Leo Bispo | 58W / 68L / 12D | |
| J | 65W / 40L / 6D | |
| coachjkane | 26W / 33L / 2D | |
| Josiah Stearman | 25W / 32L / 4D | |
| insertchessnamehere | 44W / 12L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1983 | 2471 | 400 | |
| 2024 | 2705 | 2735 | 2502 | 400 |
| 2023 | 1848 | 2497 | 400 | |
| 2022 | 1856 | 2572 | 2506 | |
| 2021 | 1870 | 2607 | 2490 | |
| 2020 | 1934 | 2587 | 2290 | |
| 2019 | 2374 | 2171 | 2600 | |
| 2018 | 2177 | 2157 | 1947 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30W / 13L / 4D | 26W / 19L / 2D | 75.7 |
| 2024 | 439W / 277L / 59D | 448W / 268L / 49D | 73.3 |
| 2023 | 360W / 285L / 49D | 364W / 290L / 45D | 80.9 |
| 2022 | 377W / 291L / 56D | 360W / 308L / 54D | 80.2 |
| 2021 | 409W / 251L / 27D | 348W / 295L / 49D | 76.7 |
| 2020 | 1293W / 942L / 141D | 1229W / 1007L / 131D | 78.9 |
| 2019 | 1149W / 844L / 119D | 1104W / 913L / 94D | 75.8 |
| 2018 | 105W / 14L / 1D | 100W / 14L / 1D | 67.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 17 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 76.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 16 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 56.2% |
| Scotch Game | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Panov Attack | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Delayed Fianchetto | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 855 | 482 | 313 | 60 | 56.4% |
| Unknown | 307 | 163 | 143 | 1 | 53.1% |
| Alekhine Defense | 289 | 160 | 114 | 15 | 55.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 259 | 143 | 96 | 20 | 55.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 234 | 130 | 92 | 12 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 223 | 99 | 103 | 21 | 44.4% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 217 | 113 | 92 | 12 | 52.1% |
| Rapport-Jobava System | 204 | 123 | 68 | 13 | 60.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 187 | 84 | 91 | 12 | 44.9% |
| Australian Defense | 172 | 100 | 64 | 8 | 58.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Horwitz Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 740 | 382 | 319 | 39 | 51.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 550 | 302 | 221 | 27 | 54.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 548 | 306 | 215 | 27 | 55.8% |
| Australian Defense | 376 | 215 | 139 | 22 | 57.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 351 | 188 | 141 | 22 | 53.6% |
| Alekhine Defense | 324 | 182 | 126 | 16 | 56.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 259 | 141 | 104 | 14 | 54.4% |
| Modern | 239 | 137 | 90 | 12 | 57.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 236 | 137 | 88 | 11 | 58.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 232 | 127 | 92 | 13 | 54.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 25 | 2 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |