Logan Clark Shafer (aka LSChess)
Meet Logan Clark Shafer, a formidable National Master who has been quietly carving their path through the chess world with a blend of calculated brilliance and relentless determination. Known online as LSChess, Logan’s journey from humble beginnings to consistently cracking the 2700+ blitz rating mark is the stuff of chess legend—okay, maybe legend-in-the-making!
Overview & Style
Logan is a seasoned tactician famous for their Early Resignation Rate of 12.66%, proving they know when to say “checkmate” and when to save some energy for the next battle. Their games often stretch into long marches with an average of about 68 moves per win and 70 moves per loss, signifying a love for deep strategic duels and thrilling endgames. Armed with a comeback rate of 77.33%, LSChess has the resilience to turn the tables even in the face of adversity. Their style shows a subtle preference for white, holding a slightly higher win rate there (46.01%) compared to black (43.39%).
Peak Performance
- Blitz Peak: 2757 (March 2025)
- Bullet Peak: 2775 (March 2025)
- Rapid Peak: 2323 (November 2023)
- Daily Peak: 1640 (April 2025)
Those peaks are no accident: with thousands of games played, Logan has shown remarkable stamina and consistency, especially in blitz and bullet formats, where rapid-fire thinking is king.
Opening Repertoire
If chess openings were an art gallery, Logan would be the curator of some very diverse exhibits:
- Blitz Favorites: The ever-mysterious Top Secret opening (over 11,000 games!), a spicy Sicilian Najdorf Adams Attack with an 80% win rate, and a reliable Caro Kann Tartakower Variation that keeps opponents guessing.
- Bullet Trends: A taste for Reti Opening Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack with perfect wins, and some experimental play in the King's Indian Attack.
- Rapid Choices: Solid love for the Top Secret opening again, peppered with some Queens Gambit Declined Austrian Variation surprises.
Playing Habits & Quirks
Logistician by day, blitz beast by night: Logan’s win rate slightly dips when the clock ticks past midnight, but mornings, especially around 09:00 AM, are their chess sweet spot. The hours between 6 and 9 AM enjoy a particularly sharp spike in wins—evidence that either the caffeine hits just right or the chess gods smile on early risers.
Logan’s psychological resilience is notable too, sporting a tilt factor of 27. Famous for comebacks, they have a knack for recovering after losing material and turning desperate positions into victory. But make no mistake—they also know their limits, resigning early to avoid catastrophic blunders (roughly 13.96% one-sided losses).
Record & Rivalries
With over 5,000 blitz wins and nearly as many losses, Logan’s chess journey is a rollercoaster with intense battles and moments of glory. Battles against top opponents like Neil Lad and Supergk09 have been frequent, with win rates in the 40-50% range. Against some feared rivals like Coachvikasverma and Fabianocaruana_97, they’ve maintained a warrior’s undefeated record – 100% win rate!
Recent Highlights
Fresh off electrifying victories in the 2025 Early Titled Tuesday Blitz tournament, Logan dazzled with a checkmate finish against SoyuzTM4 employing the elegant Alapin Sicilian Defense. Their strategic patience and tactical precision culminated in an impressive sequence of moves, sealing the game at move 39 with a checkmate that left no room for doubt.
Fun Fact
Logan's online alias, LSChess, is rumored to stand for "Legendary Strategist Chess" —though some speculate it's just a clever way to avoid using their full name and thereby confusing their opponents.
Whether grinding out 1000+ game marathon streaks or dazzling with creative openings, Logan Clark Shafer remains a keen tactician, a resilient fighter, and above all, a true chess lover who treats every game as both a battle and a dance.
Overview of Your Recent Bullet Play
You’ve shown a willingness to enter sharp, tactical battle in bullet formats. Your games demonstrate good drive to create activity and pressure on the opponent, which is essential when you have very limited time to decide. The latest rounds indicate you can swing momentum with active rooks and pointed piece activity, but they also highlight the risk of getting tangled in complex lines without a clear plan.
What You’re Doing Well
- Initiative and pressure: You often push for dynamic ideas and look for forcing moves that challenge your opponent under time pressure.
- Adaptability: You handle a variety of openings and still seek practical, fight-filled middlegames rather than settling for passive structures.
- Endgame fighting spirit: Even when positions get tight, you stay active and search for practical chances to complicate or convert.
Key Areas to Improve
- Time management in quick games: Aim to identify 2–3 candidate moves early and lock in a solid plan after the first forcing sequence. Avoid staying in uncertain calculations too long.
- Move selection under pressure: In bullet, favors quick, solid developing moves over overly risky improvisations. When unsure, switch to safe consolidating moves that keep you ahead in activity or material balance.
- Endgame technique under time pressure: Practice rook and pawn endings and simple king activity patterns so you can convert advantages or hold draws more reliably when seconds are ticking down.
- Pattern recognition with puzzles: Regular, focused practice on common tactical motifs (checks, captures, forks, pins) will speed up your decision-making in live games.
- Opening clarity for bullet: Maintain a compact repertoire with clear middlegame plans. Knowing typical pawn structures and typical breaks will help you avoid being tied to uncertain tactical threads.
Targeted Practice Plan
- Daily quick puzzles (5–10 minutes): focus on checks, captures, and threats, aiming to find correct ideas within 60 seconds per puzzle.
- Endgame drills (2–3 sessions this week, 15–20 minutes each): practice rook endings, king activity, and converting passes pawns in simplified positions.
- Opening consolidation (1 topic this week): pick two bullet-tested openings and study the typical middlegame plans and common pawn breaks, plus a simple decision checklist for the first 12 moves.
- Post-game reflection (after each bullet game): identify 3 moments where a simpler, safer choice was possible and note an alternative line you could have played under time pressure.
Practical Next Steps
Implement the plan above over the next 1–2 weeks. When you practice, keep a simple mental rulebook for bullet: develop quickly, seek active plans, and avoid overworking uncertain tactical lines. Share a few representative positions you found challenging, and I’ll tailor short drills to address those themes.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Shanmukha Meruga | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| Sherzod Khodjimatov | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| David Gasparyan | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| cmjkao | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| jesper_kjaergaard-jensen | 4W / 0L / 0D | |
| viktoker | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| criticize | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| xenophom | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| unizighty | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| americaneagle2256 | 21W / 3L / 7D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2642 | 2637 | 2306 | 1517 |
| 2024 | 2706 | 2573 | 2249 | 1423 |
| 2023 | 2333 | 2312 | 2233 | 1447 |
| 2022 | 2072 | 1444 | 1948 | 1460 |
| 2021 | 1708 | 1235 | 1963 | |
| 2020 | 1584 | 1556 | 1636 | 1046 |
| 2019 | 1476 | 1404 | 1373 | 1091 |
| 2018 | 1364 | 1438 | 1255 | 1225 |
| 2017 | 1290 | 1304 | 1191 | 1267 |
| 2016 | 1233 | 1307 | 1266 | 1143 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 945W / 733L / 217D | 862W / 827L / 244D | 86.5 |
| 2024 | 1154W / 1101L / 276D | 1103W / 1224L / 283D | 80.9 |
| 2023 | 799W / 911L / 197D | 778W / 906L / 176D | 61.6 |
| 2022 | 1006W / 943L / 229D | 922W / 979L / 182D | 72.7 |
| 2021 | 259W / 163L / 44D | 240W / 181L / 37D | 70.9 |
| 2020 | 176W / 152L / 41D | 170W / 164L / 28D | 78.0 |
| 2019 | 170W / 174L / 24D | 164W / 188L / 23D | 59.2 |
| 2018 | 231W / 223L / 28D | 224W / 225L / 31D | 60.7 |
| 2017 | 152W / 153L / 22D | 117W / 164L / 31D | 62.7 |
| 2016 | 185W / 163L / 10D | 167W / 168L / 19D | 61.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1747 | 746 | 984 | 17 | 42.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 861 | 408 | 363 | 90 | 47.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 349 | 176 | 129 | 44 | 50.4% |
| Petrov's Defense | 294 | 141 | 130 | 23 | 48.0% |
| Unknown Opening* | 275 | 119 | 74 | 82 | 43.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 263 | 115 | 123 | 25 | 43.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 259 | 116 | 106 | 37 | 44.8% |
| Australian Defense | 250 | 128 | 96 | 26 | 51.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 236 | 110 | 100 | 26 | 46.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 223 | 79 | 112 | 32 | 35.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 610 | 321 | 248 | 41 | 52.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 479 | 205 | 229 | 45 | 42.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 309 | 134 | 152 | 23 | 43.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 243 | 111 | 115 | 17 | 45.7% |
| Australian Defense | 218 | 92 | 108 | 18 | 42.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 186 | 91 | 84 | 11 | 48.9% |
| French Defense | 184 | 100 | 72 | 12 | 54.4% |
| Modern | 161 | 58 | 90 | 13 | 36.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 160 | 61 | 80 | 19 | 38.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 142 | 54 | 77 | 11 | 38.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 148 | 79 | 59 | 10 | 53.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 147 | 81 | 51 | 15 | 55.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 91 | 34 | 40 | 17 | 37.4% |
| Australian Defense | 78 | 36 | 35 | 7 | 46.1% |
| Petrov's Defense | 78 | 35 | 37 | 6 | 44.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 77 | 32 | 33 | 12 | 41.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 57 | 35 | 19 | 3 | 61.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 56 | 24 | 26 | 6 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 54 | 29 | 21 | 4 | 53.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 54 | 30 | 15 | 9 | 55.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 58.6% |
| Australian Defense | 25 | 8 | 16 | 1 | 32.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 20 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 19 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 42.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 18 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 38.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 16 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 38.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 58.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 2 |
| Losing | 27 | 0 |