Macmolner: A Chess Maestro with a Rich Career
Macmolner is a seasoned chess player whose journey spans over a decade of competitive play across multiple time controls. From the early days in 2012, when daily ratings soared in the 2200s and blitz competitions regularly saw scores above 2300, he demonstrated a natural aptitude for the art of chess. His career has witnessed a diverse range of performances—from the thoughtful planning of daily classics to the rapid-fire decisions in blitz and bullet formats, and even the intense focus of rapid games.
Known for his versatility and deep understanding of strategy, Macmolner has approached the game with a blend of tactical sharpness and psychological balance. His record reveals a player who is unafraid to experiment with varied openings, from the Sicilian Defense and Nimzo Indian to subtle variations of the English Opening and even offbeat defenses. His opening performance statistics show a willingness to embrace complexity and take calculated risks, often resulting in high win rates that have earned the respect of his peers.
Over the years, his ratings have evolved along with his strategic growth. Early on, he was celebrated for achieving striking results in daily chess, with peak performances that nearly touched the mid-2300s, while consistently maintaining robust ratings in blitz and bullet formats. His tactical awareness is evident in his comeback rate and his ability to secure wins even after disadvantageous moments. With over 40 moves on average per victory, his games are not only a display of technical acumen but also of endurance and a deep understanding of endgame intricacies.
Macmolner’s playing style is characterized by a measured blend of aggression and caution. His game analysis suggests an impressive balance between early aggression and late-game precision—a fact reflected in his respectable win rates with both White and Black. His psychological resilience shines through in moments of adversity, often turning the tide by capitalizing on even the smallest missteps from his opponents.
A true competitor at heart, Macmolner is equally at home in the quiet concentration of a daily game as he is in the lightning pace of blitz contests. Whether facing familiar rivals or new challengers, his record against a wide array of opponents shows an adaptability and commitment to continuous improvement. His performance metrics throughout the week and across different hours of the day further reveal a player who is at his best when the stakes are high, always ready to deliver a brilliant display of chess mastery.
In summary, Macmolner’s chess biography is a testament to his enduring passion, evolving strategic insight, and competitive spirit. He stands as a formidable force in the chess community—a player whose depth of preparation, tactical prowess, and psychological fortitude have defined a remarkable journey in the modern era of chess.
Coach's Advice
It's been a while since you played. Play a few more games so we have more positions to review — then I can provide you with clearer, more actionable advice.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| SomePatzer | 46W / 49L / 10D | View Games |
| magneto2 | 61W / 10L / 3D | View Games |
| eax | 57W / 10L / 2D | View Games |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 38W / 22L / 1D | View Games |
| pmoafimadani | 33W / 10L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2404 | 2598 | ||
| 2023 | 2390 | |||
| 2022 | 2598 | 1550 | ||
| 2021 | 2412 | 2598 | ||
| 2020 | 2413 | 2598 | 1859 | |
| 2019 | 2429 | 1859 | ||
| 2018 | 2306 | 2465 | 1859 | |
| 2017 | 2404 | 2450 | 1826 | |
| 2016 | 2245 | 1738 | ||
| 2015 | 2395 | 2306 | 2197 | 2046 |
| 2014 | 2340 | 2177 | 1697 | 2044 |
| 2013 | 2382 | 2300 | 1679 | 2044 |
| 2012 | 2398 | 2352 | 1200 | 2086 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6W / 0L / 0D | 10W / 2L / 0D | 23.3 |
| 2023 | 5W / 6L / 0D | 2W / 8L / 0D | 46.0 |
| 2022 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 56.3 |
| 2021 | 72W / 23L / 2D | 65W / 20L / 0D | 0.4 |
| 2020 | 10W / 1L / 6D | 15W / 7L / 0D | 72.0 |
| 2019 | 114W / 62L / 1D | 121W / 60L / 1D | 2.6 |
| 2018 | 38W / 20L / 2D | 32W / 28L / 2D | 13.2 |
| 2017 | 341W / 123L / 5D | 382W / 106L / 3D | 3.2 |
| 2016 | 689W / 174L / 0D | 627W / 182L / 3D | 1.9 |
| 2015 | 14W / 10L / 3D | 16W / 10L / 3D | 73.4 |
| 2014 | 13W / 2L / 1D | 11W / 5L / 0D | 66.4 |
| 2013 | 543W / 171L / 29D | 490W / 214L / 43D | 77.0 |
| 2012 | 1027W / 220L / 53D | 972W / 275L / 71D | 76.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3171 | 2396 | 771 | 4 | 75.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 86 | 60 | 23 | 3 | 69.8% |
| Dutch Defense | 30 | 18 | 10 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 26 | 19 | 4 | 3 | 73.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 24 | 13 | 7 | 4 | 54.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 17 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 52.9% |
| Czech Defense | 16 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Blumenfeld Countergambit | 16 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation | 16 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 56.2% |
| Modern | 15 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 86.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Modern | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 257 | 207 | 40 | 10 | 80.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 225 | 185 | 37 | 3 | 82.2% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 191 | 151 | 33 | 7 | 79.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 146 | 115 | 28 | 3 | 78.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 98 | 68 | 26 | 4 | 69.4% |
| Czech Defense | 88 | 65 | 19 | 4 | 73.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 86 | 61 | 20 | 5 | 70.9% |
| King's Indian Attack | 77 | 60 | 15 | 2 | 77.9% |
| Alekhine Defense | 77 | 55 | 16 | 6 | 71.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 75 | 50 | 21 | 4 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 57 | 6 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |