Paul Szuper - The Blitz Maestro
Meet Paul Szuper, a chess enthusiast whose journey from a humble 998 blitz rating in 2017 to smashing through the 2800 barrier by 2024 is nothing short of legendary. With a keen tactical awareness that boasts a jaw-dropping 99.98% win rate after losing a piece, Paul seems to have a sixth sense for turning the tides when the going gets tough. If you ever catch him in a blitz game, be prepared for explosions of creativity and nerve—after all, his longest winning streak reached a nerve-wracking 24 games.
A Swift Climber and Relentless Fighter
Paul's blitz journey reads like a thriller novel: from averaging a modest rating in the low 2000s, he steadily improved each year, finally peaking at an impressive 2830 out of over 7000 blitz games. Not just a one-style wonder, he also dabbles in rapid and bullet chess. Though his bullet rating hovers around the 2300s, his rapid play remains solid at over 2300, showcasing versatility across the time controls.
Opening Mysteries & Top Secrets
When it comes to openings, Paul keeps his opponents guessing. He’s played a staggering 41,000+ blitz games with 'Unknown Opening' with a respectable win rate hovering above 41%. And if that’s not cryptic enough, he sneaks in nearly 4,100 games with a so-called Top Secret opening—shh!—winning close to 40% of those.
Psychological Profile: Tilt, Comebacks & Endgames
With a relatively low early resignation rate of 0.72% and a love for endgames (played in over 81% of his games), Paul isn’t one to give up easily. His mental toughness is solid, although he admits a tilt factor of 17 (that's just human, right?). But don’t worry; his comeback rate hovers near 90%, making him the phoenix rising again and again—especially in nail-biters that average over 80 moves per win.
Stats to Brag About
- Blitz Wins: 18,578
- Blitz Losses: 22,976
- Bullet Games: Over 28 games with some experimentation
- Rapid Peak Rating: 2,383
- Daily Chess: Modest but persistent
Paul’s psychological streak is as fascinating as his play: despite occasional tilt, he's a master of bouncing back. His win rate with the white pieces is slightly higher than black (42.19% vs 40.08%), making those white openings a favored battleground.
The Legend of Paul Szuper
Chess coaches beware! Paul’s tactical prowess, a blend of high endgame frequency and nearly flawless win rates after losing material, marks him as a prodigy in blizzard-like blitz play and a worthy adversary in rapid matches. So if you want to challenge this guy, bring your best moves, or prepare for a tough ride—and maybe a few laughs when he pulls off yet another sneaky comeback.
Recent Performance Overview
Paul, your recent games show a competitive performance with a strength adjusted win rate close to 49.3%. Over the last month, you've gained 11 rating points, reflecting positive momentum, and over the past year, your ratings trend upwards despite some fluctuations.
- 1 month rating increase: +11 points
- 3 month rating increase: +110 points
- 6 month rating decrease: -26 points
- Rating trend slopes: positive short and long term balances indicate resilience and improvement
Strengths in Recent Games
Your recent wins demonstrate strong tactical awareness and good control in the opening and middle game. A few positive patterns include:
- Effective use of pressure on the center and open files
- Good conversion of advantage into winning endgames
- Smooth transitions between opening, middlegame, and endgame phases
- In some games, aggressive play leveraging opponent weaknesses paid off
Areas for Improvement
From your losses and close games, there are constructive takeaways to focus on:
- Opening Preparation: Some losses involved concessions in opening or early middle game (e.g. Queen’s Gambit Declined lines, Philidor Defense). Deepening opening knowledge and exploring alternative lines could increase your confidence and reduce early disadvantages.
- Handling Tactical Defenses: Opponents took advantage of tactical nuances; continuous practice on tactical motifs and calculation under blitz time controls can improve precision.
- Endgame Technique: A few games show opportunities missed in simplifying to winning endgames; focusing on common endgame themes and theoretical positions can boost your results.
- Time Management: Maintaining steady decision times in critical moments will help reduce errors and allow deeper evaluation.
Opening Selection and Performance
You have experience with popular openings such as the Queen's Gambit Declined, Nimzo-Indian Defense, and Philidor Defense, reflecting classical and well-studied choices. To get the most from these:
- Review recent games with these openings to identify recurring challenges or strong points.
- Incorporate review of critical move orders and plans within your opening repertoire.
- Study thematic middlegame structures linked to these openings for better overall understanding.
Next Steps for Continued Growth
To leverage your upward trend and strengthen your blitz play, consider the following:
- Regular tactical training focused on spotting and avoiding common pitfalls
- Analyze loss games to understand key turning points—especially in the opening and transition phases
- Work on endgame fundamentals and practice converting small advantages
- Maintain balanced time usage during games to stay sharp in critical positions
- Occasionally try new opening variations in casual games to explore opportunities and avoid predictability
Final Encouragement
Your competitive record and recent improvements are commendable. Keep focusing on learning from each game and refining your strategic and tactical skills. The positive trends in your rating show that you are on a good path. Stay motivated and enjoy the process!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| letsgoband | 4W / 7L / 1D | |
| mahirsalkic | 5W / 4L / 0D | |
| Rafael Vahanyan | 6W / 4L / 0D | |
| selfishshellfish | 5W / 5L / 0D | |
| Gabriel Gähwiler | 1W / 9L / 1D | |
| xiaottt5164 | 7W / 4L / 1D | |
| faceeverytingandrice | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| nikita2504 | 5W / 18L / 3D | |
| harrywinzer14 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| gracejo | 2W / 7L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Nebojsa Djordjevic | 69W / 80L / 21D | |
| Khatanbaatar Bazar | 42W / 104L / 21D | |
| honestgirl | 22W / 87L / 13D | |
| BSWPaulsen | 38W / 51L / 14D | |
| Daniel Taboas Rodriguez | 54W / 34L / 8D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2274 | 2697 | 2376 | |
| 2024 | 2329 | 2735 | 2364 | |
| 2023 | 2612 | 2380 | ||
| 2022 | 2382 | 2555 | ||
| 2021 | 2617 | 2197 | 1611 | |
| 2020 | 2563 | 1646 | ||
| 2019 | 2565 | |||
| 2018 | 2463 | |||
| 2017 | 2430 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1590W / 1830L / 350D | 1503W / 1980L / 288D | 86.1 |
| 2024 | 1609W / 1919L / 302D | 1456W / 2048L / 307D | 85.1 |
| 2023 | 1006W / 1299L / 251D | 981W / 1363L / 197D | 83.5 |
| 2022 | 1201W / 1498L / 253D | 1114W / 1558L / 236D | 83.7 |
| 2021 | 1259W / 1462L / 242D | 1174W / 1544L / 231D | 83.6 |
| 2020 | 1306W / 1410L / 294D | 1240W / 1554L / 249D | 80.7 |
| 2019 | 1275W / 1462L / 212D | 1240W / 1497L / 207D | 78.7 |
| 2018 | 773W / 895L / 130D | 761W / 908L / 119D | 79.8 |
| 2017 | 384W / 408L / 53D | 392W / 404L / 36D | 76.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 5934 | 2426 | 3010 | 498 | 40.9% |
| Australian Defense | 5438 | 2411 | 2642 | 385 | 44.3% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation | 2317 | 944 | 1184 | 189 | 40.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 1768 | 660 | 984 | 124 | 37.3% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 1542 | 670 | 744 | 128 | 43.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1529 | 680 | 742 | 107 | 44.5% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 1045 | 394 | 577 | 74 | 37.7% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 977 | 430 | 476 | 71 | 44.0% |
| Czech Defense | 950 | 391 | 464 | 95 | 41.2% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 807 | 371 | 384 | 52 | 46.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 22.2% |
| Philidor Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| English Opening | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Old Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Fianchetto Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Classical Variation, Argentine Counterattack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 4.Bg5 Nbd7 5.e3 c6 6.Nf3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGA: 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.g3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 24 | 0 |
| Losing | 17 | 1 |