Daniel Barria - The International Master of Chess
Meet Daniel Barria, better known in the 64-square kingdom as manitodeplomo. Holding the esteemed title of International Master from FIDE, Daniel is no stranger to the fierce battles of bullet and blitz chess arenas, where speed meets precision (and occasionally, heroic blunders).
Daniel's chess career is an epic saga of highs, lows, and plenty of caffeine-fueled marathons. Since 2011, their bullet rating rocketed from a modest 1455 to a mind-boggling peak rating of 2805 in March 2025. That's not a typo! Whether gnawing through the clock or outsmarting opponents in lightning-fast blitz games, Daniel’s average win rate hovers near 46% in bullet, tackling over 21,000 games — talk about dedication (or an unhealthy addiction to chess.com).
On the blitz battlefield, Daniel has danced through over 9,000 clashes with a nearly 49% winning score, showcasing versatility in openings that include the Sicilian Defense Taimanov Variation and the Queen’s Gambit Declined Ragozin Alekhine Variation. And don't forget their rapid games, with bright moments peaking above 2400 FIDE — enough to make even the grandmasters squint.
What makes Daniel truly fascinating? They boast an impressive comeback rate of over 82%, proving that even when pawns are lost, hope—and clever tactics—are never far away. In fact, after losing a piece, Daniel still clinches victory 45% of the time. When life gives Daniel lemons, they checkmate the lemon tree.
Despite the occasional grim streak (a longest losing spree of 25 games – hey, nobody’s perfect), Daniel’s fighting spirit is unmatched. Whether it's Monday morning or the witching hour (their prime time is midnight!), Daniel’s on-the-clock prowess keeps the chess world guessing.
Off the board, Daniel's playful style is hard to categorize – quick moves, deep strategy, and enough nerve to sometimes resign early (only about 1.3% of games, so mostly a gentleman) - a humble warrior with a long memory for endgames, averaging over 73 moves per win. Ah, the epic endings Daniel weaves!
Recent highlights? Just look at their latest victorious performance on May 27, 2025, executing a stellar Queen's Gambit Declined Orthodox Rubinstein Variation, forcing their opponent into resignation after a strategic crescendo of sacrifices and positional mastery. Check it out for a masterclass in patient aggression!
In short, Daniel Barria is the kind of chess player that reminds us all: rapid fire and calculation may dazzle, but the true art is resilience, creativity, and knowing when to castle—and when to set your opponent aflame with a lethal attack.
Overall Performance Summary
Daniel, your recent blitz games show a positive trajectory with a strength-adjusted win rate of about 50.4%, indicating balanced competitiveness against a variety of opponents. Notably, your rating has increased by 52 points in the last month and 112 points over three months, reflecting consistent improvement. The upward rating trend slopes over 1, 3, and 6 months further confirm your ongoing progress, although there appears to be a slight dip over the past year worth monitoring.
Strengths in Your Recent Games
- Opening Choices: You frequently use well-studied openings like the Queen’s Gambit Declined and variations of the King's Indian Defense, showing good opening preparation and strategic foundation.
- Endgame Technique: Your ability to convert advantages in the late middlegame and endgame phases is evident from your wins by resignation or opponent time forfeits.
- Positional Play: You demonstrate solid positional understanding, particularly controlling key squares and leveraging pawn structure imbalances to your advantage.
- Time Management: Winning some games on time shows you manage your clock effectively in blitz settings, an important practical skill.
Areas to Improve
- Tactical Awareness: Some losses occurred from opponent tactical strikes and pressure, suggesting opportunities to sharpen your calculation and board vision during critical moments.
- Opening Variability: Expanding your repertoire beyond your favored openings could help reduce predictability and improve adaptability against knowledgeable opponents.
- Time Pressure: Despite good overall time management, staying calm and precise under severe time pressure will further reduce mistakes.
- Handling Complex Positions: A couple of losses involved complicated middle-game scenarios. Focusing on simplifying or improving your decision-making in such positions could be beneficial.
Recommendations for Continued Improvement
- Review key moments from your losses to identify recurring tactical oversights and missed opportunities.
- Incorporate regular tactical puzzles into your training to enhance spotting combinations quickly in blitz games.
- Experiment with introducing new opening lines to diversify your play and force opponents out of preparation.
- Analyze your time usage in critical positions to find ways to avoid rushed decisions during the final moments.
- Keep building your endgame knowledge to maintain your strength in converting advantages reliably.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| slawomir_kurpiewski | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Kanan Garayev | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Alexander Gelman | 1W / 4L / 0D | View |
| Artem Galaktionov | 3W / 5L / 1D | View |
| József Mátyás Herpai | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Veronika Shubenkova | 3W / 9L / 0D | View |
| liusia | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Rasmus Svane | 1W / 15L / 0D | View |
| Mitrabha Guha | 2W / 10L / 0D | View |
| earlybird2012 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| idvidal | 227W / 224L / 59D | View Games |
| Dmitry Tatarinov | 167W / 243L / 27D | View Games |
| Vasiliy Korchmar | 162W / 180L / 46D | View Games |
| Mauricio Ramirez | 126W / 129L / 21D | View Games |
| Leo Bispo | 121W / 121L / 19D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2584 | 2698 | ||
| 2024 | 2792 | 2663 | ||
| 2023 | 2542 | 2688 | ||
| 2022 | 2687 | 2656 | 2362 | |
| 2021 | 2708 | 2673 | 2025 | |
| 2020 | 2755 | 2590 | 1896 | |
| 2019 | 2509 | 2701 | ||
| 2018 | 2425 | 2581 | ||
| 2017 | 2499 | 2298 | ||
| 2016 | 2497 | 2300 | ||
| 2015 | 2415 | 2331 | ||
| 2014 | 2383 | 2422 | ||
| 2013 | 2385 | 2279 | ||
| 2011 | 2370 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 518W / 469L / 72D | 461W / 528L / 79D | 77.3 |
| 2024 | 1024W / 944L / 154D | 834W / 1127L / 131D | 78.3 |
| 2023 | 859W / 881L / 64D | 714W / 1000L / 67D | 73.5 |
| 2022 | 1266W / 1252L / 193D | 1088W / 1452L / 169D | 75.6 |
| 2021 | 611W / 641L / 76D | 513W / 735L / 82D | 75.8 |
| 2020 | 2100W / 1352L / 222D | 2035W / 1356L / 259D | 76.0 |
| 2019 | 1053W / 1132L / 140D | 921W / 1212L / 176D | 77.2 |
| 2018 | 190W / 210L / 18D | 173W / 221L / 19D | 74.6 |
| 2017 | 131W / 123L / 5D | 110W / 132L / 12D | 68.9 |
| 2016 | 52W / 36L / 4D | 54W / 38L / 3D | 69.9 |
| 2015 | 36W / 25L / 6D | 39W / 24L / 5D | 78.5 |
| 2014 | 159W / 107L / 15D | 138W / 121L / 23D | 74.5 |
| 2013 | 206W / 149L / 20D | 187W / 165L / 18D | 78.6 |
| 2011 | 19W / 1L / 0D | 18W / 2L / 0D | 63.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 1043 | 525 | 470 | 48 | 50.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 960 | 447 | 479 | 34 | 46.6% |
| Australian Defense | 898 | 395 | 457 | 46 | 44.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 856 | 466 | 348 | 42 | 54.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 779 | 298 | 449 | 32 | 38.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 663 | 319 | 317 | 27 | 48.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 595 | 263 | 297 | 35 | 44.2% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 473 | 206 | 238 | 29 | 43.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 416 | 201 | 195 | 20 | 48.3% |
| Alekhine Defense | 415 | 189 | 211 | 15 | 45.5% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 364 | 195 | 137 | 32 | 53.6% |
| Australian Defense | 262 | 121 | 120 | 21 | 46.2% |
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 254 | 138 | 92 | 24 | 54.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 231 | 104 | 103 | 24 | 45.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 222 | 118 | 86 | 18 | 53.1% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 206 | 93 | 85 | 28 | 45.1% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 198 | 106 | 76 | 16 | 53.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 190 | 99 | 76 | 15 | 52.1% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 174 | 99 | 58 | 17 | 56.9% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 164 | 90 | 63 | 11 | 54.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 64.3% |
| Australian Defense | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 27.3% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 14.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Modern | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 26 | 1 |
| Losing | 25 | 0 |