Profile of marcods
Marcods began his competitive chess journey in 2016, starting with a Blitz rating of 1393. Over the years, he demonstrated unwavering dedication and a keen strategic mind, ultimately driving his Blitz rating as high as 2790 by 2025. Along the way, he maintained a strong presence in the Bullet arena, moving from an initial 1160 rating to an impressive peak of 2722 in 2023.
Although Marcods occasionally dabbled in Daily chess, where he reached a peak of 1200, his true focus has been speed-driven formats: Blitz and Bullet. He also took on Rapid events, achieving as high as 1872. Throughout his progression, he developed a particular flair for dynamic play, often preferring open lines and active defenses. From Sicilian Dragons to various modern and semi-open defenses, he tested out a wide range of setups—displaying vigor and willingness to adapt.
Statistical trends show that marcods wins more than half his games when playing White (55.15% win rate) and still operates at a robust 51.87% when moving second. He excels in longer battles with an average of 71.6 moves per successful game, and he heads into approximately 78.8% of his games willing to fight deep into the endgame. His ability to recover from setbacks is remarkable—as indicated by an 85.97% comeback rate and a 93.62% win rate even after initially losing material.
Marcods also displays unique strengths in terms of time and emotional control. While his tilt factor sits at 13, suggesting some frustration in tough spells, his rated vs. casual differential of over 11% proves he consistently performs best under competitive pressure. When it comes to scheduling, he tends to thrive in the late-night to early-morning hours, sometimes surpassing a 60% win rate during those periods.
Overall, marcods’s chess style is tenacious, resourceful, and ever-evolving. He combines solid opening preparation with a strong endgame focus and a fierce will to fight back from disadvantageous positions. Whether vying for the top spots in Blitz, fine-tuning his Bullet reflexes, or exploring occasional Rapid and Daily challenges, he continues to push boundaries, making him a formidable competitor across multiple time controls.
Overview of recent play
You have shown a willingness to enter dynamic, tactical lines and to seek active play. In your rapid games, you’ve faced a mix of sharp middlegames and strategic battles, and you’ve demonstrated resilience in complex positions. The focus now is to sharpen calculation, improve resilience in defense, and convert advantages into clear wins more consistently.
What you’re doing well
- You pursue active plans and look for ways to pressure the opponent’s king when lines open up.
- You’re flexible in your opening choices and can handle both classical and sharper, more aggressive setups.
- You maintain perseverance in tactical melees and keep working for concrete goals even when the position is unclear.
Immediate improvement goals
- Strengthen defense in sharp middlegames: before committing to aggressive plans, quickly verify that there aren’t forcing threats you miss. Build a habit of scanning for tactical resources your opponent may have.
- Endgame conversion: practice converting small advantages into wins. Focus on straightforward rook endings and simple queen endings, with a clear plan to activate the king and rooks.
- Time management in complex positions: aim to keep a steady pace and avoid getting into heavy time pressure in the middle of tactical sequences. Develop a routine to handle forced lines efficiently.
- Pawn structure discipline: when choosing aggressive pawn pushes, ensure you have a practical follow-up and avoid creating weaknesses (like isolated or doubled pawns) that your opponent can target later.
Openings performance snapshot
You show solid results across several openings and have a broad, adaptable repertoire. A productive path forward is to consolidate 2–3 openings as your core and keep a couple of surprise lines for surprise value. This helps you anticipate common middlegame plans and reduce uncertainty in the early phase of the game.
- Consider deepening the Caro-Kann and Scandinavian families, which you’ve used effectively in practice. Caro-Kann Defense Scandinavian Defense
- Explore strategic, slower transpositions in the Sicilian and related lines to gain familiarity with typical structures and endgames.
- Develop a short endgame-focused set of ideas that arise from these openings so you can convert small advantages more reliably.
Training plan for the next two weeks
- Daily tactic practice (15–20 minutes) concentrating on back-rank motifs, piece overloads, and queen activity in the middlegame.
- Study 2 openings in depth (Caro-Kann and Scandinavian): learn typical middlegame plans, common traps, and key move orders. Use placeholder resources for deeper study: Caro-Kann Defense Scandinavian Defense
- Endgame work: focus on rook endings and rook-plus-minor-piece endings with practical plans (activate rooks, centralize the king, create a pawn breakthrough).
- Review two recent games to identify one concrete improvement per game (for example, improve prophylaxis, improve king safety, or simplify in favorable positions).
- Play one longer training game per week and annotate it afterward to solidify lessons learned.
Optional study note
If you’d like, I can generate a focused training PGN highlight from your games to study specific patterns you’ve faced recently.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| bonblobliqr1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Eric Lawson | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| gmarkovic21 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| rostokas | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| balkandadchess | 4W / 1L / 1D | |
| kcerov | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| xenophom | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| pratham1111111111 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| jermov | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| yassy_gd | 23W / 5L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gersonx | 100W / 40L / 11D | |
| fjulio10 | 13W / 15L / 12D | |
| Safal Bora | 11W / 20L / 1D | |
| Jose Martinez | 0W / 29L / 0D | |
| yassy_gd | 23W / 5L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2549 | 2642 | 1830 | |
| 2024 | 2617 | 2712 | 1841 | |
| 2023 | 2689 | 2619 | ||
| 2022 | 2542 | 1738 | ||
| 2021 | 2422 | 2522 | 1548 | |
| 2020 | 2479 | 2417 | ||
| 2019 | 2442 | 2486 | ||
| 2018 | 2509 | 2620 | ||
| 2017 | 2210 | 2400 | 869 | |
| 2016 | 2143 | 2201 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 286W / 204L / 23D | 241W / 235L / 22D | 78.7 |
| 2024 | 131W / 88L / 13D | 131W / 88L / 10D | 80.4 |
| 2023 | 198W / 132L / 19D | 210W / 128L / 17D | 80.3 |
| 2022 | 11W / 7L / 2D | 10W / 6L / 3D | 71.9 |
| 2021 | 39W / 10L / 8D | 34W / 12L / 8D | 82.9 |
| 2020 | 193W / 98L / 18D | 155W / 123L / 24D | 77.1 |
| 2019 | 450W / 386L / 65D | 434W / 405L / 70D | 75.9 |
| 2018 | 1000W / 723L / 94D | 896W / 812L / 83D | 74.6 |
| 2017 | 94W / 72L / 6D | 99W / 62L / 9D | 76.3 |
| 2016 | 122W / 73L / 8D | 129W / 68L / 5D | 75.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 634 | 292 | 342 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 311 | 158 | 133 | 20 | 50.8% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 215 | 107 | 85 | 23 | 49.8% |
| Modern | 205 | 110 | 88 | 7 | 53.7% |
| Benko Gambit | 203 | 92 | 96 | 15 | 45.3% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 178 | 82 | 83 | 13 | 46.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 169 | 87 | 70 | 12 | 51.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 158 | 91 | 55 | 12 | 57.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 154 | 83 | 61 | 10 | 53.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 142 | 79 | 58 | 5 | 55.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 123 | 82 | 38 | 3 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 63 | 38 | 25 | 0 | 60.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 61 | 33 | 24 | 4 | 54.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 61 | 34 | 26 | 1 | 55.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 61 | 37 | 22 | 2 | 60.7% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 58 | 40 | 17 | 1 | 69.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 55 | 33 | 20 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 52 | 34 | 15 | 3 | 65.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 46 | 28 | 15 | 3 | 60.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 43 | 26 | 14 | 3 | 60.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Horwitz Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 3 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |