Chess Profile: Marepant
Marepant is a dedicated chess enthusiast who has pursued excellence across multiple time controls. Known for reaching a remarkable peak Blitz rating of 2781, their Daily games have also soared to an impressive 2264. They have consistently tested themselves in Bullet and Rapid as well, showcasing a versatile skill set that balances quick instincts with deeper strategic planning.
Throughout their chess journey, Marepant has recorded hundreds of games, notably achieving 372 wins in Daily play and 531 in Blitz. With a tendency to reach endgames in three-quarters of their encounters, Marepant exhibits strong finishing technique. They also display remarkable resilience, boasting an 81% comeback rate and an extraordinary ability—over 97%—to turn around positions where they initially lose material. This fighting spirit is further highlighted by their longest winning streak of 20 consecutive victories.
Stylistically, Marepant’s average win comes in around 67 moves, while their losses often stem from longer battles, reaching an average of 80 moves. Playing as White, they secure nearly 64% of their wins, and as Black, they maintain a robust 58% success rate. With best results typically surfacing around 5:00 PM local time, they thrive when fully focused. Their repeated showdowns against “Fiona” and “pdgendt”—among their most frequent opponents—reveal a competitive spirit eager to face familiar rivals again and again.
Whether playing standard chess or venturing into variants like Chess960 and Bughouse, Marepant’s determined, comeback-oriented style has earned a reputation for unpredictability and tenacity. With an ever-growing record of triumphs, they continue to refine their tactical awareness and strategic depth, making Marepant a formidable presence at any virtual board.
Feedback for Marigje Degrande
Hi Marigje, I’ve reviewed some of your recent games and I want to commend you on your active and fighting style. Your opening choices (mostly English and Catalan structures) show a good understanding of strategic fundamentals. Here are some specific observations and suggestions to help you improve even further:
Strengths
- Opening Knowledge: You consistently play sound openings and often reach solid, flexible middlegame positions.
- Tactical Awareness: You have a tendency to capitalize on opponent's inaccuracies and tactical oversights, which is a great edge in both rapid and daily games.
- King Safety: Castling promptly and maintaining your king’s safety is a plus in your games.
Areas for Improvement
- Decision Making in Complex Positions: In some critical moments, it seems there is hesitation or suboptimal moves that allow your opponent to seize the initiative. Focus on improving calculation accuracy, especially in tactical sequences where material imbalances arise.
- Endgame Technique: Some losses demonstrate that there is room for sharpening your endgame skills. Regularly practicing fundamental endgame positions (king and pawn, rook endgames) will increase your conversion rate in close games.
- Time Management: In longer time controls, try to balance your time usage better. Avoid spending too much time on less critical moves and make sure you have enough time to solve complex middlegame and endgame challenges.
- Handling Pressure: When defending, keep calm and look for active defensive resources or counterplay instead of passive or weakening moves.
Practical Suggestions
- Continue reviewing your losses by key positions — try to understand if there was a turning point where evaluation changed drastically.
- In your recent win against MihirRaja (English Opening), you played aggressively and pressured the opponent effectively. Look to replicate this assertiveness especially when you have good development and space.
- Consider adding some structured endgame study sessions to your training routine — this will pay off in longer games.
Overall, you are on a great path. Keep focusing on deepening your understanding of tactical motifs and endgame scenarios. Patience and consistent practice will show steady rating improvement.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Fiona Steil-Antoni | 26W / 9L / 2D | |
| laoshu1 | 9W / 5L / 4D | |
| jpepello | 11W / 4L / 0D | |
| exileom | 14W / 0L / 0D | |
| mrtoolytoots | 10W / 0L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2201 | |||
| 2023 | 2304 | 2201 | 2002 | 2097 |
| 2022 | 2341 | 1550 | 2099 | |
| 2021 | 2044 | 2270 | 1940 | 1918 |
| 2020 | 1860 | 2030 | 1738 | 2046 |
| 2019 | 1845 | 1774 | ||
| 2018 | 1924 | 1780 | ||
| 2017 | 1834 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 65.0 |
| 2023 | 103W / 50L / 11D | 86W / 68L / 13D | 72.7 |
| 2022 | 161W / 94L / 17D | 141W / 122L / 13D | 79.3 |
| 2021 | 139W / 56L / 25D | 141W / 58L / 22D | 77.5 |
| 2020 | 142W / 46L / 13D | 130W / 50L / 12D | 66.8 |
| 2019 | 44W / 13L / 6D | 32W / 21L / 4D | 62.8 |
| 2018 | 47W / 23L / 4D | 47W / 20L / 8D | 73.8 |
| 2017 | 5W / 3L / 1D | 5W / 0L / 1D | 58.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 78 | 48 | 28 | 2 | 61.5% |
| French Defense | 46 | 22 | 15 | 9 | 47.8% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32 | 7 | 0 | 82.0% |
| English Opening | 38 | 24 | 8 | 6 | 63.2% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System | 38 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 29 | 16 | 9 | 4 | 55.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 27 | 8 | 16 | 3 | 29.6% |
| English Opening: Closed, Taimanov Variation | 27 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 74.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 22 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 72.7% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 21 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 52.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 54 | 39 | 12 | 3 | 72.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 45 | 36 | 5 | 4 | 80.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 19 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 73.7% |
| English Opening | 18 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 77.8% |
| English Opening: Carls-Bremen System | 16 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 81.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Australian Defense | 11 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 81.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Dutch Defense | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| English Opening | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening | 42 | 25 | 15 | 2 | 59.5% |
| French Defense | 27 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 74.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 26 | 16 | 10 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 26 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 65.4% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 21 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 19 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 57.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 19 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 68.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 68.8% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System | 15 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 53.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 14 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 57.1% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 2 |
| Losing | 7 | 0 |