Jake Darmanin - Candidate Master of the Chessboard
Once upon a checkered battlefield, Jake Darmanin emerged as a Candidate Master, a title proudly stamped by FIDE, and carrying with it the sign of someone who knows their knights from their bishops, and has probably checkmated a few opponents before breakfast.
Rating Rollercoaster
From a scrappy 2085 bullet rating in 2015 to a jaw-dropping 2506 in 2025, Jake’s journey has been anything but dull. His blitz rating has also seen a robust climb, reaching 2504 in 2025, proving that speed chess is Jake’s playground. When it comes to rapid and daily chess, Jake shows a taste for versatility, though the rapid ratings tell a tale of some fiery battles and quick recoveries.
Playing Style & Chess Shenanigans
Jake doesn't just play chess; they live it. With an impressive comeback rate of nearly 83% and a win rate after losing a piece soaring at 96.88%, it’s clear Jake is the embodiment of grit and determination. After all, who else turns losing a queen into a reason to smile and defy the odds? With an average of 71 moves per win, patience truly is a virtue here—although sometimes Jake’s losses stretch even longer, proving that giving up early is clearly not on their to-do list (only a 3.81% early resignation rate, thanks very much).
Tactical Genius or Psychological Ninja?
Jake's tilt factor sits at a modest 14, which in chess terms means they might get a little miffed when things go South—but nowhere near legendary meltdown territory. And while their rated play vs casual games shows a quirky negative tilt difference, perhaps Jake just likes to keep the suspense alive. Opponents beware: a highest winning streak of 34 games means this player can snowball like a grandmaster avalanche once on a roll.
Opening Repertoire & Favorite Moves
Whether it’s the “Unknown Opening” (a.k.a. “Mystery Gambit”) or the intriguingly named “Top Secret” opening, Jake has honed a winning touch—with a near 60% win rate in bullet games. Secret’s out—Jake’s favorite openings might just be those nobody can figure out, keeping opponents perpetually on their toes (and sometimes running into unexpected checkmates!).
Opponents and Notable Rivalries
Jake’s most-played opponent clocks over 120 clashes—a testament to fierce and competitive duels that could rival an epic chess saga. With a varied win rate against the chess crowd, Jake’s record resembles a thrilling movie, full of surprises, heartbreaks, and major triumphs.
Conclusion
All in all, Jake Darmanin is not just a chess player, but a chess entertainer—turning each game into a storybook adventure of strategic masterstrokes, dramatic comebacks, and that contagious joy of battling sixty-four squares. Watch this space; the next chapter is destined to be legendary.
What you’re doing well in blitz
You’ve shown moments of sharp tactical awareness and the ability to press when your opponent overextends. In quick games, you’ve also demonstrated good piece activity and a readiness to seize open lines and attack chances when they appear.
- You identify forcing sequences that create concrete chances to win material or momentum.
- Your pieces frequently coordinate on active squares and you look to challenge the opponent’s king safety in dynamic positions.
- You remain resilient in the middlegame, keeping practical chances alive even when positions become complex.
- You have some solid endgame feel in situations where you’ve exchanged into favorable simplifications.
Key areas to improve for the next blitz sessions
- Time management under pressure: aim to form a clear plan within the first six to eight moves, then execute it consistently. When the clock is tight, prefer safe, straightforward moves that improve your position rather than risky complications.
- Endgame conversion: practice common rook endings and simple pawn endings so you can convert advantages cleanly rather than letting tiny errors slip in late.
- Opening consistency: pick a small, reliable blitz repertoire and learn the typical middlegame plans for those lines. This helps you reach playable positions faster and reduces the chance of getting tangled in early chaos.
- Positional awareness: focus on identifying targets (weak pawns, open files, king safety) in the early and middle stages to guide your plan rather than chasing every tactical possibility.
- Post-game review habit: after each game, spend a few minutes reviewing critical moments and note one concrete improvement to apply in the next game.
Opening ideas to explore
Opening choices appear to give you dynamic play, with some lines yielding favorable middlegame chances. Consider reinforcing a compact, practical repertoire for blitz and focusing on the core plans rather than delving into overly theoretical lines.
Explore these options to build confidence in blitz contexts: Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation and Center Game: Berger Variation
To study a compact practice sequence, you can use this starter line:
Practice plan for the coming weeks
- Daily: spend 15 minutes on tactics puzzles to sharpen pattern recognition and calculated risk-taking in short time controls.
- Weekly: dedicate 2 sessions to focused opening study from your chosen blitz repertoire and review at least one game to identify a key moment for improvement.
- Endgames: include 2 focused endgame drills per week, emphasizing rook endings and king activity in simplified positions.
- Post-game reviews: after each blitz game, note one concrete adjustment you’ll apply in the next game (plan, time management, or a specific tactic idea).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| glidzhian_gor | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| Hamzeh_Masoud | 1W / 3L / 0D | |
| hannibal4 | 4W / 2L / 0D | |
| hieii | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| tikus_apii | 4W / 2L / 0D | |
| bufingleb | 0W / 3L / 0D | |
| r538 | 3W / 2L / 0D | |
| narvaintheheart | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| trungkien2025 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| sonnycrock3tt | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| robertzerafa | 55W / 60L / 7D | |
| x-7623965595 | 57W / 0L / 0D | |
| Jack Mizzi | 46W / 7L / 3D | |
| Stein Aarland | 20W / 22L / 1D | |
| zvika gutfroind | 22W / 18L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2545 | 2399 | 2042 | |
| 2024 | 2423 | 2509 | ||
| 2023 | 2286 | 2360 | ||
| 2022 | 2227 | 2265 | 2042 | |
| 2021 | 2284 | 2230 | ||
| 2020 | 2317 | 2353 | 2041 | |
| 2019 | 2114 | 2267 | 1752 | |
| 2018 | 2123 | 2394 | 1966 | |
| 2017 | 2139 | 2262 | 2046 | |
| 2016 | 2197 | 2166 | 1200 | 1982 |
| 2015 | 2085 | 2010 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 911W / 765L / 109D | 718W / 947L / 109D | 81.6 |
| 2024 | 1014W / 921L / 122D | 806W / 1134L / 109D | 80.7 |
| 2023 | 831W / 670L / 77D | 725W / 788L / 75D | 78.1 |
| 2022 | 307W / 219L / 24D | 281W / 257L / 27D | 76.3 |
| 2021 | 459W / 318L / 38D | 394W / 399L / 33D | 77.1 |
| 2020 | 707W / 464L / 48D | 596W / 562L / 66D | 77.2 |
| 2019 | 810W / 523L / 67D | 680W / 665L / 67D | 79.1 |
| 2018 | 1076W / 775L / 97D | 1004W / 851L / 83D | 78.7 |
| 2017 | 739W / 433L / 38D | 696W / 490L / 34D | 73.0 |
| 2016 | 2361W / 1646L / 210D | 2215W / 1789L / 167D | 71.8 |
| 2015 | 7W / 1L / 0D | 6W / 1L / 0D | 55.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2262 | 1201 | 945 | 116 | 53.1% |
| Modern | 1281 | 660 | 569 | 52 | 51.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1240 | 674 | 500 | 66 | 54.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1161 | 607 | 471 | 83 | 52.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1155 | 616 | 469 | 70 | 53.3% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 1137 | 694 | 386 | 57 | 61.0% |
| Unknown | 993 | 518 | 475 | 0 | 52.2% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 766 | 339 | 398 | 29 | 44.3% |
| Scotch Game | 742 | 368 | 336 | 38 | 49.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 702 | 389 | 289 | 24 | 55.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 271 | 166 | 95 | 10 | 61.2% |
| Alekhine Defense | 200 | 102 | 94 | 4 | 51.0% |
| Modern | 194 | 106 | 82 | 6 | 54.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 174 | 104 | 62 | 8 | 59.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 130 | 84 | 41 | 5 | 64.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 121 | 67 | 53 | 1 | 55.4% |
| French Defense | 112 | 81 | 30 | 1 | 72.3% |
| Australian Defense | 106 | 64 | 36 | 6 | 60.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 94 | 51 | 41 | 2 | 54.3% |
| Czech Defense | 94 | 47 | 46 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation, Main Line | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Old Steinitz Defense, Semi-Duras Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Scotch Game | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Closed, Taimanov Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 34 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 4 |