Matthew Badjoy: Chess Player Profile
Once upon a chessboard, in the mystical land of pawns and knights, there emerged a player known only as Matthew Badjoy. Not much is known about his origins — whether he was born clutching a rook or if his first words were "checkmate in three" — but one thing is certain: Matthew lives and breathes chess... albeit sometimes with a flair for the dramatic resignation.
Rating & Style
Matthew's journey through the ranks is a tale of steady growth sprinkled with rapid bursts of brilliance. At his peak, he hit a blistering 1775 in Blitz back in August 2022 — proving he's no stranger to fast-paced chaos. His Bullet dance reached a jaunty 1571, and even in Rapid chess, he managed a respectable 1654 rating. Daily chess? Let's just say he took his time climbing toward 1394.
But beware the panicked moves! With an early resignation rate of 97.45%, Matthew might quit faster than you can say "Fork!" Yet, this strategic retreatist knows how to enjoy the game: his average game length hovers around 1.4 moves for wins, and his wins are just as sweet whether he plays White or Black, boasting a slight edge when pushing the dark pieces.
Blitz Battles and Openings
Blessed with a solid 52% win rate in Blitz — a battlefield of rapid-fire moves and split-second decisions — Matthew favors the mysterious and the unknown. Playing thousands of games with "Unknown Opening", he's the undisputed king of surprise and chaos. Among his favored weapons are the Scandinavian Defense (Mieses Kotrc Variation) and the ever-elusive Pirc Defense. His win rates suggest he's a cunning tactician with a predilection for leaving opponents wondering what just happened.
Comebacks & Tilt
If you manage to snatch a piece from Matthew, don't celebrate too soon — his comeback rate might just humble you at 1.75%, even if his win rate after losing a piece swings a modest 43.09%. Like all mortals, he isn't immune to the tilt, clocking a Tilt Factor of 38. But he recovers, often returning to the board sharper at dawn (8:00 AM seems to be his magic hour).
Recent Noteworthy Games
Matthew’s most recent victory was a nail-biter where he won on time in a Queens Pawn Opening battle, proving that sometimes chess is as much about endurance as brilliance. On the flip side, his latest setback was a tense timed game lost on the clock to an opponent named LeaSSBM, a testament that even the best can slip on time management occasionally.
Not Just Numbers
Beyond statistics, Matthew is a chess personality — a mix of grit, flair, and just a pinch of “I’m outta here!” His penchant for early resignations might frustrate opponents, but insiders know it’s all part of the mystery and madness that make Matthew Badjoy a uniquely entertaining player to watch, whether blitzing or battling in bullet speed.
Chess Wisdom by Matthew
“Why sweat over a complicated position? Sometimes, best is to resign early and return stronger — because life, like chess, often rewards those who know when to walk away... right before you lose your queen.”
Keep an eye on Matthew Badjoy, a player whose name alone is proof that in chess, sometimes a little bad joy is exactly what the game needs.
How to interpret your recent blitz performance
Nice progress, Алексей. Your data shows a strong one‑month improvement, but the longer-term trend has been more mixed. In blitz, the clock and risk level matter just as much as raw results, so turning that momentum into steady gains is about tightening a reliable plan and reducing time‑pressure mistakes.
- Anchor your play with a compact opening repertoire you know well. Your higher results appear with solid lines, so aim for a straightforward path in the first phase of the game.
- Limit lines that require sharp, complex calculations under time pressure. Save the most ambitious lines for practice games or longer formats until you’re comfortable with the typical responses.
- After each blitz game, note one moment where you could have chosen a safer plan and one where you missed a stronger follow‑up. Short reviews compound gains over time.
- Strengthen endgame readiness. Blitz often boils down to a few precise endgame techniques—practice king and pawn endings and simple rook endings to convert small advantages.
- Daily tactics work will help you spot common motifs quickly, reducing blunder risk in tight time controls.
Openings to lean on and lines to approach with caution
Your opening performance shows that certain lines give you reliable chances in blitz, while others are more volatile. A focused, repeatable repertoire can reduce decision fatigue when the clock is short.
- Strong performers to build around: French Defense and Amar Gambit have produced solid results for you. Consider using them as your core two lines and learn the typical middlegame plans your opponents face.
- Lines to use more cautiously in blitz, at least initially: Sicilian Defense and Czech Defense show more variability in your blitz results. Practice them in slower games or training sessions first, then introduce them in blitz after you’re more comfortable with main replies.
- Maintain a small, practical set of responses so you can stay familiar with common structures and themes rather than constantly shifting tactics.
Helpful references to your openings can be explored here as you study: French Defense, Amar Gambit.
Strategies to reduce blunders and handle the clock
Blitz is as much about time management as it is about position. Target the main time pressure pitfalls and build a rhythm that keeps you out of risky, time‑trapped decisions.
- Adopt a two‑phase approach: quick development in the first 8–12 moves, then choose a simple, solid plan if time is slipping away.
- Pre‑plan common endgames you reach often (for example, rook endings with pawns on opposite wings) so you can convert edges when the clock runs low.
- Work on pattern recognition with daily quick puzzles to speed up recognizing tactics and avoid overthinking simple threats.
- Use post‑game reviews to identify recurring mistakes (king safety, back rank weaknesses, or overlooked checks) and build specific drills to address them.
Two‑week training plan to build consistency in blitz
- Daily tactic practice (15–20 minutes): focus on common motifs like forks, pins, forks, skewers, and back‑rank ideas.
- Opening study (20–30 minutes): drill your two main lines (French Defense and Amar Gambit) until you can recall typical middlegame plans without hesitation.
- Blitz practice (3–4 sessions per week): play short games (3+2 or 4+2) with a quick after‑game note on one good move and one missed improvement.
- Endgame training (10 minutes daily): king and pawn endings, rook endings, and basic opposition ideas.
- Time‑management drills: set a target to switch to a safe plan by move 12–15 if no clear initiative is present.
Quick drills you can start today
- Practice two short sessions of 10 puzzles each focused on tactical motifs that commonly appear in blitz.
- Play one or two unrated games using your core repertoire to reinforce the plans you’ve studied.
- Review one recent blitz game with a focus on where time pressure caused you to miss a straightforward improvement.
- Keep a small notes page for patterns that repeatedly trap you or a tracker for which openings you felt least comfortable in blitz.
Notes and practical tips
If you’d like, you can share a few representative blitz games for a quick, targeted review. A sample post‑game annotation or a short PGN (the moves of a game) can be added here for tailored guidance.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| armoricain | 9W / 8L / 0D | |
| bishopnone | 40W / 33L / 1D | |
| ranga_m | 12W / 25L / 0D | |
| wegotthisdude | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| sabihbilafa | 5W / 0L / 0D | |
| bugcode | 17W / 7L / 0D | |
| haydenisakillerbot | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| triela | 40W / 45L / 0D | |
| emilan67 | 53W / 41L / 0D | |
| lssac-newton | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pateli1990 | 168W / 162L / 3D | |
| lady_bug99 | 53W / 248L / 4D | |
| super-player-09 | 161W / 113L / 1D | |
| mkaleli | 121W / 103L / 0D | |
| batmantwelve12 | 119W / 102L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1505 | 1092 | ||
| 2024 | 1194 | 1520 | ||
| 2023 | 1294 | 1082 | ||
| 2022 | 1297 | 1436 | ||
| 2021 | 1286 | 1509 | 1464 | 1184 |
| 2020 | 1300 | 1546 | 1428 | 1205 |
| 2019 | 1094 | 1366 | 1174 | 1230 |
| 2018 | 1019 | 1411 | 1200 | 1282 |
| 2017 | 834 | 1166 | 948 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5535W / 5106L / 113D | 5665W / 5088L / 130D | 0.0 |
| 2024 | 4931W / 4556L / 99D | 4946W / 4436L / 96D | 0.0 |
| 2023 | 604W / 577L / 10D | 669W / 585L / 6D | 0.1 |
| 2022 | 4122W / 3776L / 52D | 4430W / 3795L / 47D | 0.0 |
| 2021 | 6978W / 6595L / 61D | 7090W / 6151L / 65D | 0.3 |
| 2020 | 2092W / 1654L / 13D | 2223W / 1674L / 10D | 0.8 |
| 2019 | 307W / 338L / 7D | 321W / 307L / 8D | 23.6 |
| 2018 | 1610W / 1531L / 21D | 1560W / 1642L / 24D | 11.5 |
| 2017 | 291W / 322L / 3D | 292W / 342L / 5D | 8.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100687 | 52594 | 47397 | 696 | 52.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 179 | 98 | 73 | 8 | 54.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 58 | 30 | 27 | 1 | 51.7% |
| French Defense | 53 | 30 | 22 | 1 | 56.6% |
| Czech Defense | 36 | 17 | 19 | 0 | 47.2% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 31 | 15 | 16 | 0 | 48.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 25 | 12 | 11 | 2 | 48.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 22 | 8 | 13 | 1 | 36.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 21 | 9 | 11 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 135 | 71 | 61 | 3 | 52.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 72 | 39 | 31 | 2 | 54.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 44 | 28 | 15 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 34 | 18 | 14 | 2 | 52.9% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 33 | 18 | 14 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 32 | 8 | 23 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 28 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 46.4% |
| Australian Defense | 26 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 57.7% |
| Modern | 24 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 45.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 23 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 47.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 168 | 88 | 79 | 1 | 52.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 22 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 40.9% |
| French Defense | 21 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Czech Defense | 20 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 16 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 43.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 13 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 23.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 36.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 47 | 25 | 21 | 1 | 53.2% |
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| French Defense | 8 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 12.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 20.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| English Opening | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 0 |
| Losing | 38 | 3 |