Meet Md I S, aka md_intiyaz – The Chessboard Biologist
Somewhere between the opening gambit and the endgame, Md I S has been quietly evolving his chess skills like a curious creature in its natural habitat. With a rapid climb in rating from a modest 387 in 2023 to a sleek 1207 by 2025, he’s no mere pawn—he’s a full-grown predator in the chess ecosystem.
Rating Evolution & Playing Style
With an average rapid rating soaring from around 680 to over 1166 in just three years, Md I S’s progress is nothing short of a biological marvel. Like a cell dividing at just the right moment, his tactics multiply effectively with an impressive 57.45% frequency of endgames, and a keen psychological resilience boasting a stellar 74.23% comeback rate. His white pieces conduct symphonies on the squares with a winning rate of 51.94%, while black often plays a slightly more reserved but still strategic role with a 47.14% win rate.
Tactical DNA
True to his name, Md I S’s tactical awareness is a gene worth cloning—when down a piece, he snaps back with a perfect 100% win rate. Sure, he’s been known to surrender early just 5.34% of the time, but even the best organisms sometimes throw in the towel to conserve energy for the next match.
Chess Ecosystem & Opponents
His opponent records display a fascinating predator-prey balance, with some opponents like “miniborder” and “dipaksenapati0” falling prey to a 100% win rate. Yet, he’s humble enough to test his mettle against the stubborn few who challenge him, like “gonzoshiz,” where he’s still learning the survival tactics with a 0% win rate. A current winning streak of 1 shows that the evolutionary game is always ongoing.
Preferences & Fun Facts
- Longest Winning Streak: 10 games — a true mating call to challengers everywhere.
- Favorite Opening: Top Secret (quite the adaptive species!)
- Active Hours: Peaks around 11 PM and afternoon hours, when the neurons fire brightest.
- Games Played: Over 3,500 in rapid alone, proving his stamina through countless battles on the board.
In sum, Md I S is a fascinating specimen in the wild world of chess—melding patience, sharp tactics, and psychological endurance in a survival of the fittest. Watch out for his next move; it’s likely a checkmate mutation!
Quick summary
Good job — you’re winning by creating concrete pawn and piece activity rather than hoping for miracles. Your recent win came from forcing pawn breaks and converting a passed pawn; your losses mainly came from pawn races and tactical slips in sharp positions. Below I’ll highlight positives, weak spots, and a short practical plan.
Win: what you did well
Game vs abuyoussouf — you converted a kingside pawn advance into a passed pawn and then pushed it to create decisive threats.
- You stayed calm when your opponent chased pieces with the queen early and continued development — good discipline.
- You created a direct pawn storm that opened lines at the right moment; that led to a passed pawn and concrete promotion threats.
- When queens came off, you smoothly switched to an endgame plan and used your king and rook actively to support the passer.
Takeaway: your aggressive pawn play + active piece coordination is a real strength when it’s backed by calculation.
Losses: clear improvement areas
Reviewing recent defeats (for example vs andres7717 and bengerdx), two themes repeat:
- Pawn‑race management — you lost games where the opponent’s outside pawns became unstoppable. When an outside passer appears, either blockade it early or activate your king/rook to stop it.
- Tactical oversights and loose pieces — some losses started with a simple exchange or capture that left pieces undefended or allowed the opponent to invade. Add a quick 5‑second tactical check before each move: look for hanging pieces, forks, checks, and back‑rank vulnerabilities (Loose piece).
Patterns & habits I see
- You favor dynamic, pawn‑pushing play. That gives practical chances and explains your good win conversion rate in many openings.
- You often trade minor pieces early — useful, but sometimes it hands the opponent a clearer path to outside passers or king invasions. Before trades, ask: “Does this make my king safer or theirs?”
- Your openings lead to open, tactical middlegames. That suits you — keep honing the tactical vision and endgame technique that support that style.
Concrete next steps (2‑week plan)
- Daily tactics: 10 puzzles/day focused on forks, pins, and discovered attacks. Emphasize accuracy over speed.
- Endgame drills: 15 minutes/day on king + pawn vs king, rook endgames with passed pawns, and basic queen vs pawn promotion races.
- Opening check: review one line you play regularly (for example your Bishop/Italian‑type setups). Learn the typical pawn breaks and one key trap to avoid — label it Bishops-Opening for study.
- Play 5 rapid games (10+2 or 15+10) applying this rule: don’t trade into pawn races unless your king/rook can stop the passer.
Mini checklist to use in each game
- Opening: finish development and connect rooks before launching a risky pawn storm.
- Middlegame: spot outside passers early — choose blockade or king activation, not passive waiting.
- Before any capture: ask “Does this leave anything undefended?”
- Endgame: active king + rook behind passers beats passive defense; prioritize cutting squares for the enemy king.
Short practice exercises
- Tactics set: 3 forks, 3 pins/skewers, 4 mating net puzzles each day for a week.
- Endgame scenario: set up an outside passer vs blockader and practice both sides until the winning plan is clear.
- Game review: pick one recent loss and annotate the turning point — I can do this for you if you want a move‑by‑move breakdown.
Closing notes
You have strong practical instincts — aggressive pawn play and willingness to create messes are why you score wins. Tightening up simple tactical checks and practicing a few common endgame motifs (blockade, king activity, rook behind passer) will convert more of your good positions into wins and avoid the pawn‑race losses.
If you’d like, I can either build a 2‑week daily schedule for you or annotate one of your recent losses move‑by‑move. Which do you prefer?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| andres7717 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| bengerdx | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| rinat_kr | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| abuyoussouf | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| adsa18 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| khalilbouj | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mutyaubyu | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| freezinggem | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ponniahsudalai | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ahsan_raza | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| upendraa1234 | 9W / 18L / 0D | View Games |
| naveenreddy323 | 12W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| tahamalekian | 4W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| bellamkondaupendra834gmai | 6W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| adityajha1964 | 5W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 621 | 844 | 1327 | |
| 2024 | 362 | 668 | 1187 | 198 |
| 2023 | 397 | 533 | 855 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 492W / 449L / 53D | 495W / 478L / 36D | 62.6 |
| 2024 | 627W / 549L / 58D | 586W / 607L / 49D | 61.5 |
| 2023 | 240W / 171L / 14D | 202W / 208L / 15D | 55.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 343 | 177 | 149 | 17 | 51.6% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 339 | 166 | 159 | 14 | 49.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 325 | 160 | 151 | 14 | 49.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 233 | 111 | 108 | 14 | 47.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 223 | 108 | 105 | 10 | 48.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 214 | 117 | 86 | 11 | 54.7% |
| Elephant Gambit | 170 | 83 | 81 | 6 | 48.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 158 | 86 | 67 | 5 | 54.4% |
| Philidor Defense | 147 | 79 | 61 | 7 | 53.7% |
| Scotch Game | 132 | 55 | 72 | 5 | 41.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 37 | 20 | 17 | 0 | 54.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 35 | 17 | 15 | 3 | 48.6% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 34 | 21 | 12 | 1 | 61.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 32 | 17 | 13 | 2 | 53.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 30 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 23 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 56.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 19 | 4 | 13 | 2 | 21.1% |
| Elephant Gambit | 18 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 18 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 61.1% |
| Scotch Game | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 64.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 11 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 27.3% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 88.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Petrov's Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Carls-Bremen System | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 0 |
| Losing | 16 | 3 |