MeroAghiad: The Streaming Grandmaster of the Blitz Realm
Meet MeroAghiad, a chess streamer whose keyboard prowess echoes through the blitz arenas and beyond. Not just your average mouse-clicker, MeroAghiad has climbed the ranks with a tempestuous mix of brainpower, speed, and endurance that would leave even the most stoic grandmasters blinking in disbelief.
Rating Rollercoaster & Peak Performance
From modest beginnings in 2017 with a blitz rating just north of 1100, MeroAghiad has rocketed to an astounding peak blitz rating of 2815 as of March 2025. A rating so high, one wonders if the chessboard bends around their sheer will. The bullet rating peaked at an impressive 2451, proving MeroAghiad is just as deadly when the clock is ticking furiously. Rapid and daily ratings are respectable side shows, but the real circus happens when the bullet and blitz clocks start their countdown.
Style & Strategy: Nimzowitsch Enthusiast and Tactical Dynamo
Known for favoring the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack, especially the Modern and Indian variations, MeroAghiad often surprises opponents with offbeat, yet deeply calculated moves. Their opening repertoire screams, "Catch me if you can," with a balanced 50.2% win rate in blitz on their signature variations.
Their gameplay is an intriguing blend: an early-resignation rate of just about 1.1% suggests MeroAghiad rarely gives up—not that they have to. The endgame appears to be their playground, witnessing an impressive 81% endgame frequency. Their average game length is around 84 moves when winning, indicating patience and precision rather than reckless rushing. The comeback rate is a fearsome 85%, meaning even lost positions ignite a fiery resurgence.
Psychological Warfare & Playing Times
MeroAghiad’s tilt factor stands at a modest 15, so while frustration exists, it’s usually short-lived—though their trouser legs might occasionally get wrinkled. Fun fact: their best time to play is around 1 AM—either the chess gods smile then, or the opponents are sleep-deprived. The streamer’s win rates dip a bit when playing higher-rated opponents, but they savor the challenge, entering fierce skirmishes where every second counts.
Streamer Spotlight & Memorable Battles
MeroAghiad's streaming channel is a treasure trove of exciting blitz battles. Their recent win against a formidable 2729-rated opponent, "Squid_Stomper," ended with MeroAghiad’s clock triumph—proving convincing time pressure skills. Conversely, their recent loss on a classic Closed Sicilian line against "Road_to_3OOO" reminds viewers that even the best have off days.
The Numbers Game
- Total blitz wins: 9,936
- Total bullet wins: 1,077
- Longest winning streak: 27 games
- Longest losing streak: 15 games
Fun Facts & Quirks
MeroAghiad thrives on firing off that tricky Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack, but is also known to dabble boldly in the Philidor Defense Hanham Lion Variation and the Trompowsky Attack, no matter the tough odds. They are like a chess chameleon, blending aggression with calculation.
Despite wielding mighty 2700+ blitz power, MeroAghiad still battles the occasional “warm-up phase” and occasional tilt—which is perhaps why their spirit never breaks and their gameplay stays human (with a pixel-perfect pinch of meme-worthy moments, naturally).
In the chess streaming world, where viewers rarely see the sweat but always hear the excitement, MeroAghiad stands out as a fierce competitor and beloved commentator—proving that chess is both art and sport, played fast, loud, and with a smile (or a well-timed smirk).
What you’re doing well
You show a willingness to enter sharp, tactical play in blitz and you often generate active counterplay when your opponent tries to seize the initiative. In the recent games, you demonstrated strong piece coordination and the ability to press in dynamic positions, which is a good mindset for blitz. You’re also capable of converting advantages in the later stages of the game when you keep your king safe and push passers or coordinated pieces, which is a valuable strength in fast time controls.
- Comfort with aggressive setups and willingness to test the opponent’s defenses under time pressure.
- Ability to activate pieces efficiently when the position is open or when complex tactical possibilities arise.
- Resilience in long sequences where accurate calculation leads to tangible decisions (for example, converting middlegame activity into a decisive finish when given space).
Key areas to improve
- Endgame conversion: In blitz, the game often comes down to a few simplified or rook-and-pawn endings. Work on common rook endings, king activity, and technique for converting even small material or tempo advantages into a win. A small improvement here can turn many near-misses into solid wins.
- Time management and decision speed: With blitz time pressures, practice generating 2–4 strong candidate moves quickly and selecting one plan. Build a quick evaluative routine: threat check, development safety, and a concrete follow-up plan within a couple of seconds per move before committing.
- Opening discipline and repertoire: A broad repertoire is valuable, but blitz can benefit from a tighter setup. Consider specializing in 1–2 White responses to provide a clear middlegame plan, and 1–2 Black reply systems for common White setups. This reduces guesswork and increases confidence under pressure.
- Defensive readiness in sharp lines: When the opponent launches immediate threats, practice recognizing forcing lines and key defensive resources. Develop a habit of pausing to verify counterplay opportunities before choosing a riskier continuation.
- Tactical pattern recognition: Regular quick-fire tactics training (forks, pins, skewers, discovered attacks) helps you spot winning ideas faster in blitz without sacrificing solid structure.
- Post-game review routine: After each blitz session, note 2–3 critical moments and ask: What was the main threat, and did I respond with the strongest defensive or counter-attacking move? Could I have simplified to a favorable endgame earlier, or avoided a costly exchange?
Practical training plan you can start this week
- Reinforce a compact opening repertoire: Pick two White lines to play against 1.d4 and two against 1.e4, plus one Black reply for common 1.d4 and 1.e4 setups. Study the typical middlegame plans and pawn structures that arise from those choices, so you have a clear path instead of improvising on every move.
- Endgame practice: Do 2–3 short rook endgame drills per week, focusing on keeping the king active, coordinating the rooks, and creating or stopping passed pawns. Use a simple checkerboard routine (practice from a known drawn endgame to a win) to build confidence under time pressure.
- Short, daily tactic work: 15–20 minutes of tactical puzzles on motifs you encounter often (forks, pins, skewers, and discovered checks). Try to apply the patterns in your blitz games within the next week.
- Blitz time-management drills: Practice at a 3+2 or 5+0 time control once or twice a week. At the start of each game, set a rule to identify 2–3 candidate moves within 15 seconds and choose the plan you’ll pursue before calculating deeper variations. Review how well you stuck to that plan after the game.
- Post-game reflection routine: After each session, write a one-paragraph note on the most consequential moment in the game and one alternative line you could have taken. This reinforces learning and reduces repeat mistakes.
If you’d like, I can tailor a 2-week focused plan
Tell me which openings you prefer and how many blitz sessions you aim for each week. I’ll propose a concise, day-by-day plan with focused drills, target endgames, and a short post-game review process designed to fit your schedule.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rafail Antoniou | 9W / 6L / 1D | |
| fox1k3 | 2W / 5L / 0D | |
| Sully McConnell | 2W / 2L / 2D | |
| Angel Jesus Marquez Ruiz | 4W / 1L / 1D | |
| Kuzmicz Krystian | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| prime-morty | 3W / 2L / 1D | |
| Rix_pv | 11W / 10L / 3D | |
| szmm19 | 1W / 3L / 2D | |
| mhero1996 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| pannekoekenbakker01 | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 7W / 46L / 5D | |
| Nebojsa Djordjevic | 20W / 29L / 6D | |
| phonysallly | 13W / 21L / 8D | |
| Vjacheslav Weetik | 14W / 24L / 3D | |
| PracticeMakesOK | 13W / 23L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2707 | 1963 | 780 | |
| 2024 | 2342 | 2569 | 2026 | 780 |
| 2023 | 2451 | 2543 | 2017 | 870 |
| 2022 | 2413 | 2483 | 2054 | 742 |
| 2021 | 2412 | 2410 | 1272 | 1106 |
| 2020 | 2212 | 2086 | ||
| 2019 | 1947 | 1971 | ||
| 2018 | 1750 | 1879 | 1136 | 1176 |
| 2017 | 1401 | 1478 | 1124 | 1130 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 712W / 759L / 181D | 636W / 874L / 137D | 91.4 |
| 2024 | 711W / 798L / 144D | 635W / 900L / 124D | 86.6 |
| 2023 | 971W / 1041L / 164D | 874W / 1153L / 172D | 86.0 |
| 2022 | 1246W / 1001L / 150D | 1127W / 1124L / 131D | 83.6 |
| 2021 | 318W / 233L / 51D | 285W / 280L / 35D | 86.7 |
| 2020 | 41W / 19L / 2D | 38W / 20L / 3D | 77.2 |
| 2019 | 763W / 609L / 86D | 732W / 639L / 88D | 81.1 |
| 2018 | 822W / 550L / 92D | 784W / 605L / 94D | 81.2 |
| 2017 | 428W / 319L / 41D | 393W / 362L / 34D | 74.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 4265 | 2128 | 1799 | 338 | 49.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 862 | 403 | 401 | 58 | 46.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 862 | 365 | 433 | 64 | 42.3% |
| Czech Defense | 646 | 270 | 331 | 45 | 41.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 587 | 248 | 301 | 38 | 42.2% |
| Australian Defense | 548 | 241 | 276 | 31 | 44.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 533 | 240 | 246 | 47 | 45.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 497 | 204 | 263 | 30 | 41.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 488 | 225 | 233 | 30 | 46.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 444 | 187 | 218 | 39 | 42.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 11 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 81.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Czech Defense | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Dutch Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 15 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 46.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 305 | 201 | 95 | 9 | 65.9% |
| Modern | 211 | 114 | 83 | 14 | 54.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 125 | 73 | 47 | 5 | 58.4% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 116 | 71 | 36 | 9 | 61.2% |
| Australian Defense | 80 | 41 | 36 | 3 | 51.2% |
| King's Indian Attack | 66 | 39 | 21 | 6 | 59.1% |
| French Defense | 63 | 39 | 21 | 3 | 61.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 60 | 29 | 28 | 3 | 48.3% |
| East Indian Defense | 43 | 22 | 21 | 0 | 51.2% |
| Döry Defense | 41 | 27 | 13 | 1 | 65.8% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 1 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |