Milan Franic: Master of the Chessboard
Milan Franic, known in the chess world as mfranic, is an International Master with a flair for blitz chess that could make even the toughest grandmasters sweat. With a peak blitz rating reaching an impressive 2533 in 2025, Milan has proven time and time again that speed and strategy are the perfect combination for success.
Starting out in 2012 with a modest blitz rating of 1403, Milan’s journey through the ranks resembles a thrilling chess game filled with tactical strikes, surprising comebacks (a nearly 90% comeback rate!), and a knack for accumulating wins by the bucketload—over 47,000 blitz victories to date! Not to mention an avid rapid and bullet player, though nothing beats the adrenaline rush of those lightning-fast moves over the proverbial clock.
Known for a rather cheeky psychological edge (a tilt factor of only 16, meaning Milan doesn’t throw in the towel at the first sign of trouble), and an astonishing 100% win rate after losing a piece—yes, a full point from a setback! One-sided losses are rare, occurring less than 2% of the time, showing Milan’s fighting spirit.
Milan’s playing style tilts heavily toward deep endgames, with over 80% endgame frequency, and has a refined patience reflected in an average win taking about 72 moves. White pieces have yielded around 61% victories, black pieces nearly 56%, showing balanced prowess no matter the color.
A glance at Milan’s opponent records shows a mix of fierce rivals and friendly foes. With some opponents never winning a game, and some Milan beating more than 70% of the time, the chessboard is both a battlefield and a playground. Milan’s opening repertoire remains a closely guarded secret—fit for spies and grandmasters alike!
Milan also has a streaky side: the longest winning streak hits a whopping 31 consecutive wins, and currently, Milan rides a comfortable three-game winning wave. Blitz games are played mostly on evenings and weekends, with a slight edge in winning during those late hours when the stars (and the opponent’s blunders) align.
All in all, Milan Franic embodies the essence of an International Master: fierce, focused, fun, and hardly predictable. When you face Milan across the board, get ready for a battle of wits where every pawn, knight, and queen can turn the tide—because in Milan’s world, it's always more than just a game.
Overall Performance and Rating Trend
Milan, your recent performance shows a strength adjusted win rate just about 50%, which indicates solid competitiveness in your blitz games. However, the rating trajectory over the last months signals some challenges:
- A notable rating drop over the past 1 to 3 months (down 82 and 182 points respectively), though the 6-month decline is less severe (-53 points).
- The recent 1 month rating trend slope is positive, suggesting recovery or improvement.
- Longer term trends (3 and 6 months) show larger negative slopes, but the 12 month trend is positive, showing that with time, improvement is possible.
This mixed trend suggests ups and downs, which is natural. The key is to focus on areas for improvement and maintain steady progress.
Game Analysis Highlights
You have played several sharp and strategic openings such as the King's Indian Defense and different Queen's Pawn structures. Your recent wins demonstrate a strong grasp of key strategic concepts, particularly:
- Effective handling of complex pawn structures in the King's Indian Defense and Samisch variations.
- Good use of piece coordination and pressure on opponent weaknesses, as seen in positions where you advanced passed pawns and controlled open files.
- Ability to press in endgames and convert material advantage calmly.
Your losses sometimes came from tactical oversights or falling behind on development and king safety, especially against counterattacking openings like the Polish Opening.
Opportunities for Improvement
To build on your strengths and address weaknesses, consider focusing on the following areas:
- Opening Familiarity: Deepen your understanding of the openings you enjoy playing. Study typical tactical motifs and strategic plans in the King's Indian Defense and related openings to avoid being caught off guard early.
- Tactical Awareness: Work regularly on tactics to reduce errors, especially in sharp positions where the opponent can launch quick counterattacks.
- Time Management: Some losses suggest critical moments where clock pressure affected your moves. Practice balanced time allocation during games to keep your decision-making clear under time pressure.
- Endgame Technique: Strengthen endgame knowledge and technique, as converting advantages and defending tough positions can tip tight games in your favor.
Next Steps
- Review a few lost games carefully to identify tactical inaccuracies or strategic misjudgments.
- Engage in tactical puzzles daily, focusing on motifs found in your recent games.
- Study grandmaster games in your main openings to understand plans and typical piece placements.
- Play slow games occasionally to practice planning and positional understanding under less time pressure.
With your solid foundation and dedicated study, your positive rating trend in recent weeks is encouraging. Keep up the focused training and enjoy your improvement journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tom Borvander | 37W / 12L / 3D | |
| chessxmbj | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| yoann2080 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| zizicdjordje93 | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| kaamo1 | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| 1husarz | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| andis238 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| averel89 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| aram12120615 | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| galletita_enmascarada | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Fredrix Owusu-Agyemang | 180W / 76L / 3D | |
| lluiss | 121W / 32L / 9D | |
| Ivan Illiev | 77W / 67L / 12D | |
| Pharmadude | 110W / 36L / 2D | |
| Jatpalijallaa | 66W / 57L / 6D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2300 | |||
| 2024 | 2377 | |||
| 2023 | 2315 | |||
| 2022 | 2382 | 2090 | ||
| 2021 | 2356 | 1958 | ||
| 2020 | 1362 | 2323 | 1865 | |
| 2019 | 1717 | 2295 | 2161 | |
| 2018 | 1717 | 2281 | ||
| 2017 | 1459 | 2124 | ||
| 2016 | 1584 | 2117 | ||
| 2015 | 1487 | 2157 | ||
| 2014 | 1519 | 2139 | 2045 | |
| 2013 | 1200 | 2052 | 1428 | |
| 2012 | 2114 | 1335 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 440W / 271L / 61D | 405W / 291L / 68D | 74.9 |
| 2024 | 954W / 586L / 98D | 893W / 651L / 102D | 74.7 |
| 2023 | 2108W / 1297L / 187D | 1882W / 1556L / 216D | 74.8 |
| 2022 | 2304W / 1646L / 185D | 2096W / 1807L / 225D | 74.6 |
| 2021 | 391W / 280L / 42D | 323W / 337L / 49D | 74.8 |
| 2020 | 976W / 525L / 94D | 905W / 590L / 100D | 72.1 |
| 2019 | 1949W / 979L / 173D | 1863W / 1059L / 178D | 73.5 |
| 2018 | 2388W / 1682L / 108D | 2195W / 1898L / 119D | 72.2 |
| 2017 | 2480W / 1748L / 129D | 2286W / 1956L / 153D | 73.9 |
| 2016 | 2593W / 1579L / 140D | 2362W / 1810L / 154D | 74.9 |
| 2015 | 3233W / 1289L / 101D | 2984W / 1527L / 125D | 72.2 |
| 2014 | 2745W / 1232L / 88D | 2609W / 1347L / 94D | 72.0 |
| 2013 | 2209W / 1280L / 107D | 2072W / 1396L / 108D | 72.5 |
| 2012 | 178W / 117L / 12D | 184W / 120L / 9D | 74.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense | 6925 | 3949 | 2717 | 259 | 57.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 6831 | 4033 | 2491 | 307 | 59.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 6384 | 3899 | 2226 | 259 | 61.1% |
| Australian Defense | 5757 | 3378 | 2148 | 231 | 58.7% |
| French Defense | 3030 | 1684 | 1225 | 121 | 55.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 2359 | 1316 | 947 | 96 | 55.8% |
| Czech Defense | 2234 | 1219 | 919 | 96 | 54.6% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 2019 | 1111 | 826 | 82 | 55.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 1959 | 1192 | 692 | 75 | 60.9% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 1958 | 1052 | 812 | 94 | 53.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 21 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 52.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 64.3% |
| Modern Defense | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Czech Defense | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| French Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Slav Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| French Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 31 | 6 |
| Losing | 16 | 0 |