Migchiel de Jong - International Master
Meet Migchiel de Jong, a formidable International Master who has proven to be a relentless force on the chessboard. Starting with a humble daily rating of around 1414 in 2020, Migchiel soared to over 2200 in just a year, showcasing a rapid climb that would make even the most patient chess clocks sweat.
Known for a dazzling blitz rating peaking at 2646 and bullet performances reaching 2421, Migchiel is clearly not one to shy away from time pressure. With an astonishing win rate in daily games exceeding 89% when wielding their secret opening repertoire, Migchiel keeps opponents guessing and often scratching their heads.
Their playing style? One might say it's a blend of endurance and tactical wizardry. With an average game length of nearly 72 moves when victorious and an 86% frequency of endgame play, Migchiel thrives in long duels, carefully outmaneuvering foes who dared to sleep at the board. And when down a piece? Fear not, Migchiel's comeback rate sits at an incredible 86.6%, making "giving up" a word outside their vocabulary.
Psychologically, Migchiel keeps cool with a surprisingly low tilt factor of 22, yet manages to win almost every game after losing material – a true sign of resilience. Opponents beware: this player’s strategic chess muscles flex strongest during the midnight hour and Friday evenings, where win rates reach their zenith.
Off the board, Migchiel likely enjoys the thrill of fast food and rapid-fire banter – after all, who else can dominate bullet chess with such flair? With a longest winning streak stretching 28 games, Migchiel’s chess journey is marked by perseverance, skill, and perhaps a touch of mischief.
In short, whether it's blitz, rapid, or the slow grind of daily chess, Migchiel de Jong embodies the spirit of a true chess warrior, ready to strike swift, baffle returners, and claim victory with a cheeky grin.
Hi Migchiel de Jong!
You have been playing a lot of chess lately, and the data shows clear strong points as well as growth opportunities. Below you will find a brief dashboard followed by detailed feedback.
Your Activity at a Glance
Peak blitz rating: 2646 (2022-10-07)
What You’re Doing Well
- Reliable Repertoire. You steer both sides of the French Defense and related queen-pawn openings with confidence, scoring clean wins in your Daily games.
- Tactical Vision. Your win against juuliepuul finished with 24.Bg7+!, a nice example of combining pieces on dark squares. Keep nurturing this tactical awareness with regular Puzzle Rush sessions.
- End-game Technique (when the clock allows). The rook-and-pawn conversion versus Michaelisnotahost010 was smooth—accurate pawn counting, good king activation, and no unnecessary risks.
Main Improvement Themes
-
Clock Management.
All five most-recent Live losses were on time. Example: against Carlos Felipe Squella Lavin you reached a roughly equal rook-ending but flagged on move 49.
Action plan:- Switch from 3 | 0 to 3 | 2 or 5 | 5 until flagging stops.
- Play “hand-brain” blitz sessions: force yourself to move within 5 seconds for the first 15 moves, then slow down.
- Do one daily session of 3-minute Chess.com Drills to build a faster “pattern cache.”
-
Handling Winawer Pawn Storms.
In the loss to live4makingherhappy you pushed h-pawns early, weakening g3/f3 squares and inviting Black’s queenside counterplay. Compare your approach with model games by GM Short—note how White delays h4 until Black castles.
Exercise: load the critical phase below and try to find safer plans before revealing the moves.
[[Pgn| 12. h3 Nb6 13. Bb3 Bd6 14. g3 Nb6 15. h4 Nbd5 16. Ne4 … ]] -
Critical Moment Evaluation.
Versus Carlos Felipe Squella Lavin (moves 22–30) you spent half your time choosing between 22.Bxf4 and 22.g4. Both were playable, but the clock damage was fatal.
Drill: After each move ask, “Is the position tactically sharp or strategic? If the answer is strategic, cap your thinking time at 10 seconds in blitz.
Targeted Study Menu
| Openings vs Scandinavian 3…Qa5 | Review the modern 6. d4-d5 lines from GM Giri’s games. |
| French Winawer as Black | Learn the Poisoned Pawn sideline to reduce surprise value for White. |
| End-game Speed Training | Solve 10 R+P vs R studies every week; aim for 20 seconds/diagram. |
| Practical Psychology | Read Aagaard’s chapter on Zeitnot; apply the “chunk, decide, trust” routine. |
Next Steps
• Keep a one-sentence diary after each live game (“Lost thread after …, need to trust first impression”).
• Schedule a weekly 30-min self-review of your worst time-trouble positions; focus on why you hesitated—calculation overload or lack of plan?
• When comfortable, re-enter 3 | 0 pools and monitor the
Good luck, push those pawns with purpose, and—most importantly—enjoy your games!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Toomas Valgmae | 9W / 5L / 1D | |
| franklinyartey | 19W / 1L / 0D | |
| easyn1 | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| pancser1987 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| tertioconatus | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| skrzypek1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| rahul_2020j | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| hammerhandsz | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| ext_solar_system | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| vlivi | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| cachessr_10 | 91W / 5L / 1D | |
| cruz29 | 44W / 35L / 4D | |
| tijmenhofstra | 49W / 13L / 6D | |
| Jens Ove Fries Nielsen | 24W / 29L / 8D | |
| jojoilm | 33W / 4L / 23D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2312 | 2526 | 1948 | 2116 |
| 2024 | 2501 | 1888 | 2115 | |
| 2023 | 2312 | 2502 | 2062 | 2158 |
| 2022 | 2380 | 2454 | 2121 | 2067 |
| 2021 | 2314 | 2560 | 2022 | 2224 |
| 2020 | 2306 | 2501 | 2540 | 2049 |
| 2019 | 2412 | |||
| 2018 | 1905 | 2431 | ||
| 2017 | 2363 | |||
| 2016 | 2030 | 2434 | 2131 | |
| 2015 | 1371 | 2326 | ||
| 2014 | 2305 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 197W / 115L / 32D | 185W / 135L / 36D | 74.5 |
| 2024 | 215W / 124L / 55D | 189W / 146L / 52D | 75.6 |
| 2023 | 571W / 417L / 130D | 559W / 440L / 131D | 81.3 |
| 2022 | 1201W / 813L / 210D | 1113W / 893L / 205D | 80.5 |
| 2021 | 85W / 31L / 9D | 90W / 34L / 6D | 70.1 |
| 2020 | 768W / 496L / 93D | 758W / 502L / 87D | 80.5 |
| 2019 | 2179W / 1621L / 316D | 2069W / 1718L / 333D | 81.9 |
| 2018 | 1400W / 1003L / 179D | 1271W / 1118L / 183D | 81.3 |
| 2017 | 17W / 8L / 0D | 8W / 14L / 3D | 84.9 |
| 2016 | 191W / 121L / 26D | 184W / 122L / 25D | 77.5 |
| 2015 | 188W / 137L / 17D | 167W / 135L / 29D | 81.3 |
| 2014 | 105W / 66L / 6D | 95W / 74L / 12D | 81.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 1495 | 811 | 561 | 123 | 54.2% |
| French Defense | 1467 | 794 | 558 | 115 | 54.1% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 1107 | 537 | 456 | 114 | 48.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 994 | 519 | 386 | 89 | 52.2% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 856 | 453 | 317 | 86 | 52.9% |
| Australian Defense | 764 | 394 | 318 | 52 | 51.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 744 | 400 | 284 | 60 | 53.8% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 678 | 360 | 259 | 59 | 53.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 548 | 323 | 183 | 42 | 58.9% |
| Döry Defense | 505 | 239 | 216 | 50 | 47.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 13 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 46.1% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% |
| French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation, Wolf Gambit | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 88.9% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 88.9% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 111 | 63 | 41 | 7 | 56.8% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 81 | 49 | 27 | 5 | 60.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 62 | 24 | 35 | 3 | 38.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 53 | 28 | 21 | 4 | 52.8% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 51 | 30 | 18 | 3 | 58.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 50 | 33 | 14 | 3 | 66.0% |
| Australian Defense | 42 | 26 | 14 | 2 | 61.9% |
| Czech Defense | 42 | 23 | 17 | 2 | 54.8% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 40 | 25 | 14 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 39 | 25 | 14 | 0 | 64.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 28 | 1 |
| Losing | 22 | 0 |