Meet mineralfellow: The Tactical Maestro of the Chessboard
Since bursting onto the chess scene in 2011, mineralfellow has proven to be a fierce competitor with a penchant for turning the tides of battle. With a peak blitz rating soaring to an impressive 2379 and a rapid maxing out at 2278, this player blends strategic brilliance with tactical opportunism.
A Journey of Wins, Losses, and Checkmates
mineralfellow’s long-term rapid stats boast a robust 985 wins against 532 losses, complemented by 68 draws, reflecting resilience and consistency. In blitz, the intensity peaks: over 23,390 wins and a staggering 18,677 losses show a warrior unafraid of the fast pace, always pressing forward no matter the stakes. Bullet chess, while a smaller arena for this gladiator, still highlights a solid 425 victories.
Opening Moves Shrouded in Mystery – A Top Secret Strategy
True to the name, mineralfellow's favorite opening is “Top Secret,” a mysterious repertoire that has yielded more wins than many safe secrets. With a win rate over 62% in rapid and more than 52% in blitz, opponents can only guess the next move — and hope it’s not a checkmate waiting to happen.
The Psychological Edge
A low tilt factor of 12 means mineralfellow keeps cool under pressure—because even in chess, nobody likes a player who throws their queen after a bad coffee. This mental fortitude helps maintain a remarkable comeback rate of nearly 88%, turning seemingly lost battles into victorious tales.
Playing Style: The Artful Dodger
With an average game length of around 71 moves when winning (and slightly longer losing games), mineralfellow enjoys the dance of the endgame, hustling through complex positions with style and substance. Known for a strong proclivity to resign early wisely, this chess aficionado saves energy for the real fight on the board.
Best Time to Challenge the Legend
Want to test your mettle? Mineralfellow's peak playtime is at 17:00. So, grab your coffee and bishop—just don’t say we didn’t warn you about the tactical storms brewing at that hour!
Recent Triumphs & Epic Battles
Just recently, mineralfellow delivered a stunning checkmate in a Live Chess game against Hodaka_ZH, illustrating strategic depth and a killer instinct. Another match saw mineralfellow claiming victory after sacrificing pieces just to bait opponents into submission – a true chess artist at work.
Rivals Beware
mineralfellow has notable rivalries with regular opponents like malimukes and oleksandrkyiv, always ready to engage in epic skirmishes. Yet, their record is peppered with plenty of flawless wins against challenging adversaries — nobody escapes unscathed!
Final Thought
Whether you’re playing bullet chess at lightning speed or grinding out strategic battles in rapid, mineralfellow’s blend of daring, skill, and psychological resilience has made them a formidable player on Chess.com. Ever ready to cast a sneaky fork or a brutal check, mineralfellow is a name to remember... or fear.
“Checkmate? More like check-mate-a!”
Quick summary
Nice run. You turned active piece play into concrete gains and showed reliable endgame technique — especially creating and pushing passed pawns. Recurring issues are time management and allowing counterplay on open files/diagonals. Below are focused, practical steps to make your blitz more consistent.
Highlights from recent games
- Win vs olvidatodo: excellent transformation of a queenside passer into a decisive central pawn and precise rook + king coordination in the endgame.
- Wins by opponent abandonment/flag: you put constant practical pressure and forced errors — good exploitation of blitz psychology.
- Loss vs rking773: opponent got active on diagonals and ranks and you lacked timely countermeasures — more prophylaxis needed.
What you’re doing well
- Converting passed pawns — you know how to escort a passer and use it as a strategic lever.
- Active rook play and king activation in endings — often the difference between a drawn and a won game.
- Comfortable in less-common opening sidelines (e.g. Alapin Variation), which yields you practical, playable middlegames.
- Creating practical threats that pressure opponents into time trouble or errors.
Main areas to improve
- Time management: avoid getting to single-digit seconds. Keep a 20–30s buffer by simplifying decision-making early (opening/middlegame plans) and saving calculation for critical moments.
- Back-rank and second-rank safety: don’t let rooks/queens infiltrate; consider luft, rook lifts, or a traded piece to remove threats.
- Avoid unnecessary complications when already ahead — trade into winning endgames instead of hunting speculative tactics.
- Sharpen calculation on forcing lines (checks, captures, threats) — these are where blitz games swing most quickly.
Concrete drills (weekly, blitz-focused)
- Tactics: 10–15 minutes/day with emphasis on forks, pins, deflection, and mating nets. Train for speed + accuracy (aim for ~10s per puzzle with high success).
- Endgames: three 20-minute sessions/week on rook endgames and converting single passers (practical conversion drills).
- Time-control practice: play 6–10 games at 3+2 while forcing yourself to spend less than 2 minutes for the first 20 moves (build a clock buffer).
- Opening checklist: pick one main line (e.g. your Alapin or a French Advance) and write a 3-move plan for typical middlegame structures to save time during games.
Practical in-game checklist
- Before each move ask: “Does this create a new weakness or allow enemy infiltration?” If yes, fix it first.
- If ahead materially: trade down safely or limit opponent counterplay before pushing the passer.
- If low on time: choose the simplest safe move that preserves your advantage or creates an immediate threat.
Short 7-day plan
- Days 1–3: 15 min tactics + 15 min rook endgames + 3 blitz games (3+2) focusing on time buffer.
- Days 4–5: Build a 3-move plan for your two most-played openings; play 5 blitz games applying it.
- Day 6: Review 8 recent decisive games and mark the single critical moment in each (2 minutes per game).
- Day 7: Play a 15-game blitz session; after every game note one takeaway (30–60s). Repeat best ideas next week.
Examples from your recent play (how to apply fixes)
- Vs olvidatodo — your template: create passer → centralize king → trade off enemy pieces that can block/attack the passer → advance. Repeat this chain when you win material or create a pawn majority.
- Vs rking773 — when opponent threatens diagonal or rank invasion, immediately ask whether you can trade the attacking piece, create luft, or place a blockading piece; prioritize these before continuing your plan.
Follow-up
- If you want, I can make a 2-week personalized blitz plan focused on the single biggest leak you pick (time management, rook endgames, or tactical calculation). Reply with which you want prioritized.
- Want a short annotated review of one specific game (15–20 moves) from your recent PGNs? Tell me which opponent and I’ll highlight the turning moments and concrete alternatives.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gosha_krutoi | 9W / 5L / 1D | View |
| pizzagorgonzola | 10W / 15L / 3D | View |
| pawn11th | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| uaranger | 9W / 16L / 0D | View |
| onewisemelon | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| abdcefd | 6W / 2L / 0D | View |
| ffliszt | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| kayz88 | 3W / 3L / 0D | View |
| monte2305 | 4W / 5L / 1D | View |
| oleksandrkyiv | 50W / 26L / 10D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| malimukes | 55W / 33L / 7D | View Games |
| oleksandrkyiv | 50W / 26L / 10D | View Games |
| Tom Borvander | 37W / 32L / 9D | View Games |
| Capricorn9 | 36W / 25L / 1D | View Games |
| mohammad moghadas jafari | 28W / 28L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2273 | 2236 | 1974 | |
| 2024 | 2209 | 2220 | 1972 | |
| 2023 | 1940 | 2169 | 2229 | |
| 2022 | 2031 | 2137 | 2202 | 1972 |
| 2021 | 2119 | 2149 | ||
| 2020 | 1875 | 2130 | 1935 | |
| 2019 | 1759 | 2111 | ||
| 2018 | 1722 | 2077 | ||
| 2017 | 1648 | 1840 | 1932 | |
| 2016 | 1682 | 1953 | 1972 | |
| 2015 | 1655 | 1748 | 2002 | 2087 |
| 2014 | 1781 | 2032 | 2224 | |
| 2013 | 1569 | 1700 | 1784 | 2171 |
| 2012 | 1516 | 1665 | 1717 | 2111 |
| 2011 | 1520 | 1617 | 1609 | 1964 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2179W / 1683L / 291D | 2069W / 1853L / 243D | 78.4 |
| 2024 | 1919W / 1465L / 257D | 1837W / 1616L / 194D | 76.4 |
| 2023 | 1274W / 979L / 133D | 1188W / 1014L / 173D | 77.2 |
| 2022 | 1366W / 987L / 158D | 1257W / 1088L / 156D | 76.9 |
| 2021 | 1452W / 1014L / 123D | 1320W / 1145L / 141D | 76.5 |
| 2020 | 1037W / 840L / 127D | 974W / 870L / 138D | 77.2 |
| 2019 | 1068W / 871L / 130D | 1035W / 867L / 129D | 75.7 |
| 2018 | 1249W / 894L / 149D | 1150W / 993L / 125D | 76.9 |
| 2017 | 414W / 292L / 37D | 411W / 294L / 32D | 76.1 |
| 2016 | 361W / 241L / 31D | 335W / 265L / 36D | 76.9 |
| 2015 | 523W / 374L / 58D | 492W / 406L / 45D | 75.9 |
| 2014 | 277W / 146L / 19D | 250W / 153L / 30D | 73.6 |
| 2013 | 337W / 153L / 19D | 290W / 190L / 16D | 72.9 |
| 2012 | 392W / 247L / 41D | 356W / 273L / 35D | 72.1 |
| 2011 | 105W / 64L / 6D | 105W / 65L / 7D | 70.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 98 | 67 | 25 | 6 | 68.4% |
| Czech Defense | 53 | 36 | 16 | 1 | 67.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 49 | 29 | 16 | 4 | 59.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 49 | 27 | 20 | 2 | 55.1% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 39 | 27 | 12 | 0 | 69.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 37 | 23 | 12 | 2 | 62.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 31 | 19 | 11 | 1 | 61.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 29 | 21 | 7 | 1 | 72.4% |
| Philidor Defense | 29 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 79.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 28 | 16 | 10 | 2 | 57.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGA: Hanstein Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 3406 | 1847 | 1377 | 182 | 54.2% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2487 | 1402 | 946 | 139 | 56.4% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 2314 | 1214 | 945 | 155 | 52.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1896 | 1067 | 705 | 124 | 56.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1737 | 930 | 693 | 114 | 53.5% |
| French Defense | 1634 | 785 | 757 | 92 | 48.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1275 | 716 | 496 | 63 | 56.2% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1246 | 647 | 521 | 78 | 51.9% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1210 | 618 | 502 | 90 | 51.1% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 1145 | 631 | 445 | 69 | 55.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 40 | 21 | 17 | 2 | 52.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 33 | 17 | 16 | 0 | 51.5% |
| Czech Defense | 29 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 62.1% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 27 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense | 26 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 61.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 25 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 68.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 19 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 52.6% |
| Modern | 17 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 64.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 16 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Elephant Gambit | 16 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 1 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |