Shreyas Royal: The Chess Grandmaster with a Tactical Twist
Shreyas Royal, known in the chess circles as a fierce Grandmaster, has quietly been plotting checkmates and defying odds since 2018. With a FIDE title that commands respect and a blitz rating that skyrocketed to an impressive 2883 in 2024, Shreyas blends speed, strategy, and a sprinkle of unpredictability like a chess cocktail connoisseur.
Rapid, Blitz, Bullet – Oh My!
Whether it’s the lightning-fast world of bullet chess or the slightly more measured rapid games, Shreyas proves a versatile titan. Their blitz prowess is legendary: over 1,278 wins across almost 3,000 games—with an almost supernatural comeback rate of 92.84%! Losing a piece? No worries, Shreyas’s win rate after losing material is a flawless 100%, turning adversity into an art form.
Playing Style and Personality
Known for an endgame frequency of 83% and average moves per win hovering around 79, Shreyas likes to make every move count. Early resignation? Only 0.48% of the time—because giving up early is so last century.
With a white win rate just under 49% but a knack for holding their own with the black pieces at 42%, Shreyas embraces both sides of the board with aplomb. One might say they play the long game, savoring every tension-filled moment like a detective savoring a mystery novel.
Off the Board
When not crushing opponents like kogotbobra17 (100% win rate against this foe!) or narrowly escaping tricky situations against ulysees (only a 3.45% win rate there—humble moments included), Shreyas is likely honing tactics, pondering opening secrets, or laughing at memes about lost queens.
Fun Fact
Despite their serious results, Shreyas occasionally tilts just 15% of the time—proof that even grandmasters have their off days (though you'd never catch them complaining about it).
All in all, Shreyas Royal is not just a player but a grandmaster storyteller, weaving strategies and surprises on the 64 squares with the flair of a seasoned chess wizard. Whether you’re challenger or cheerleader, one thing’s clear: when Shreyas Royal sits down to play, the game is never just a game—it’s an epic saga.
Hi Shreyas!
You’ve played a huge volume of games recently, especially in Chess960. Overall your tactical alertness and willingness to seize the initiative stand out, but a few recurring patterns are costing you half-points. Below is a concise “report card” followed by concrete training ideas.
Current snapshot:
• Best blitz rating so far:
• Typical activity graphs:
What you already do well
- Fast centralisation & castling. In several Chess960 wins you managed to castle on move 1–2 (Nb3 / O-O-O, etc.), immediately removing king-safety headaches while the opponent was still finding their bearings.
- Creating double threats. Tactics such as …Qa3, …Na3# in your recent win over KogotBobra17 show very good awareness of “two-fer” ideas ( mate + piece ). Your opponents often resign once the shot lands.
- Converting material in open positions. Once a file is opened you rarely hesitate to occupy it with heavy pieces, and your calculation from move 28 onward in the English win (vs IAMSHOCKED) was crisp.
Priority growth areas
- H-pawn adventures. Many of your losses (e.g. vs Alberto Barp and argentum049) begin with early
. Kicking a knight is tempting, but it exposes g- and h-files. Before pushing a rook-pawn, force yourself to verbalise one defensive resource for the opponent—this small pause will eliminate at least half the unsound storms.
- Loose pieces & unfinished development. In the miniature below the exchange grab 13…Rxf3? left g7 fatally weak: Try adding a “loose-piece check” to your move routine (“Is anything I’m attacking/defending currently en prise?”).
- End-of-game time pressure. Two endgames this week were lost on the clock from +2 positions (e.g. vs medzhyk). With a 1-second increment you only need ~5 seconds per move to survive. Practise finishing won king-and-pawn endgames against an engine using 10 seconds for the whole side; once you’re calm there, blitz increments will feel slow.
- Prophylaxis habits. Opponents often land “annoying” zwischenzugs like …Bd4+ or …Qb2+ while you’re mid-attack. Read one chapter on prophylaxis (e.g. Dvoretsky, but any source works) and annotate three of your own games asking, “what was my opponent’s next threat?” each move.
Suggested weekly routine
| Day 1 | 15 min opening recall (one main line each side), 30 min deep analyse your last loss with engine hidden for first pass. |
| Day 2–4 | 30 tactics (themes: pins, discovered attacks, deflection). Finish with two 10+5 games focusing on time management. |
| Day 5 | Endgame drill – play out 20 K+P vs K studies against engine at depth 8. |
| Day 6–7 | Free play (blitz/Chess960) but commit to spending at least 5 min reviewing each game before queuing the next. |
Micro-skills to hone
- Use the 50-40-10 rule in unclear positions: 50 % of thinking time on own plans, 40 % on opponent replies, 10 % on “what if nothing works—do I have a safe bail-out?”
- When up material, exchange only the opponent’s best attacking piece, not automatically everything. (In two recent wins you traded down to R+P vs R when keeping queens would have mated sooner.)
- Catalogue key tactical motifs—fork, pin, skewer, zwischenzug, over-loading—create a personal flash-card deck and review five cards before every session.
Keep these notes handy and refer back after every batch of 20 games. You’re already strong tactically; combining that flair with steadier pawn structure and time handling will push you to the next rating band.
Good luck, keep enjoying the grind, and feel free to ping me after your next milestone!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Swayangsu Satyapragyan | 1W / 25L / 3D | |
| rubinstein_akiba | 1W / 11L / 4D | |
| Illia Golichenko | 6W / 4L / 1D | |
| mehedihasanongi_99 | 2W / 7L / 1D | |
| T M | 4W / 4L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2843 | |||
| 2024 | 2753 | 2837 | 2407 | |
| 2023 | 2543 | 2585 | 1997 | |
| 2022 | 2615 | 2586 | ||
| 2021 | 2484 | 2484 | 1997 | |
| 2020 | 2501 | 2435 | 1910 | |
| 2019 | 2006 | 2144 | 1910 | |
| 2018 | 1822 | 2152 | 1917 | 1974 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2W / 6L / 0D | 4W / 3L / 1D | 69.9 |
| 2024 | 159W / 104L / 32D | 123W / 148L / 25D | 87.8 |
| 2023 | 34W / 33L / 2D | 36W / 31L / 6D | 83.3 |
| 2022 | 77W / 62L / 16D | 68W / 58L / 15D | 89.6 |
| 2021 | 53W / 53L / 7D | 47W / 59L / 10D | 89.2 |
| 2020 | 163W / 146L / 26D | 145W / 168L / 24D | 81.5 |
| 2019 | 114W / 125L / 25D | 98W / 153L / 19D | 73.9 |
| 2018 | 165W / 142L / 32D | 142W / 167L / 24D | 75.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 94 | 38 | 50 | 6 | 40.4% |
| Catalan Opening | 76 | 39 | 29 | 8 | 51.3% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 62 | 25 | 30 | 7 | 40.3% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 54 | 24 | 26 | 4 | 44.4% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 53 | 28 | 21 | 4 | 52.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 53 | 21 | 30 | 2 | 39.6% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 52 | 23 | 24 | 5 | 44.2% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 49 | 24 | 21 | 4 | 49.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 46 | 19 | 23 | 4 | 41.3% |
| Benko Gambit | 46 | 22 | 18 | 6 | 47.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Catalan Opening | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 18 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 38.9% |
| King's Indian Attack | 11 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 18.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 45.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 0 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |