Jason Wang - International Master of the 64 Squares
Jason Wang, known in the digital chess realms as moderJason, proudly holds the title of International Master granted by FIDE – a badge of honor earned on hard-fought battles over checkered battlefields.
Beginning their blitz journey in 2013 with a modest rating just above 1200, Jason's meteoric rise was impossible to miss. Leaping from a starting score of 1222 to breaking the 2800 barrier in blitz by 2024, they've clearly proven that patience, practice, and a sneaky queen sacrifice can pay off handsomely.
Bullet chess? A speedster’s paradise! Jason maxed out at a blinding 2932 rating in 2024, a level where even the fastest mouse clicks in the world seem to slow down just to keep up.
Not one to neglect the longer forms, Jason holds solid ratings and performances in rapid and daily chess as well, showing that even when not racing against the clock, their strategic prowess doesn’t miss a beat.
Style and Strategy
- Early resignation rate: A humble 6.25%, proving Jason isn't one to give up unless the king is really in trouble.
- Endgame frequency: 78.43% - where cold nerves and cool calculation reign supreme. Jason loves a good endgame fight that lasts longer than a Netflix series.
- White pieces win rate: 59.61% - White often has the initiative, but with Jason at the helm it’s more like a blitzkrieg.
- Black pieces win rate: 53.49% - Also formidable when playing defense or launching a sneaky counterattack.
- Average moves per win: About 76 - eminently patient, savoring the sweet taste of victory slowly but surely.
Tactical Toughness
Jason's an expert at bouncing back. After losing a piece, they rebound to win nearly 96% of the time – a statistic that would humble most chess engines! Their comeback rate of 84.2% suggests a fighting spirit that refuses to be tamed.
A Personality of their Own
With a tilt factor of 16, Jason shows just a hint of human frustration (hey, even IMs feel the heat). Interestingly, their playing flair spikes at 8 am with an unbeatable 100% win rate – must be all those early morning coffee-fueled gambits!
Memorable Trivia
Jason’s longest winning streak is a jaw-dropping 45 games. That’s practically a grandmaster-haunting spree! But even champions occasionally pause the victory march, presently hanging at a respectable zero-game current winning streak – because even heroes need to catch their breath.
Chess Opponents and Openings
Jason’s repertoire is a top-secret labyrinth of moves, yielding a consistent 56-57% win rate across blitz, bullet, rapid, and daily games. Opponents beware: this is not your average opening book – it’s a fortress.
Fun Fact
Jason’s preferred social pastime might not be a wild night out, but rather conquering the blitzstream battlefield and other challengers with tenacity and style, gathering thousands of games and hundreds of wins – proving chess is indeed the ultimate sport for the patient and bold.
In Jason’s words: “Life’s too short for slow chess… but sometimes, the slow endgame wins the day.”
Overview of Recent Performance
Jason, your recent blitz games showcase a strong and consistent playing style, with a solid grasp of your preferred openings like the Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Barnes Defense. Your overall win record is impressive, and your rating trend over the past 6 months shows substantial progress, indicating steady improvement in your play.
Positives in Your Play
- Opening Preparation: Your use of the Nimzo-Larsen Attack, including its Classical Variation, is well-refined. Maintaining a win rate above 52% in these openings shows you're comfortable setting the tone early in the game.
- Consistent Attacking Play: From the reviewed wins, you effectively applied pressure with pawn pushes and timely piece activity, especially in central and kingside areas, which often compelled your opponents to resign.
- Time Management: In your victories, you maintained a good balance of time usage, allowing you to capitalize on opponent mistakes even in sharp positions.
- Endgame Technique: You converted advantageous positions with calm and precise technique, particularly in simplified endings where you patiently increased your advantage.
Areas for Improvement
- Handling Complex Positions: Some losses indicate struggles in complex middlegame positions where your opponents outmaneuvered you tactically. Focusing on calculation techniques and tactics puzzles could help here.
- Opening Variety & Flexibility: While your main openings are strong, diversifying your repertoire might prevent opponents from preparing extensively against your style.
- Preventing Tactical Oversights: A few recent losses involved tactical missteps or missed defenses. Enhancing pattern recognition and spending a moment reviewing potential opponent threats can mitigate these errors.
- Endgame Defense: Some losses in late endgames suggest working on defensive resources could save half points in close games.
Training Recommendations
- Dedicate regular training sessions to complex tactic exercises to improve calculation speed and accuracy under time pressure.
- Analyze your recent losses in detail, especially where tactical errors were decisive, to learn spotting similar patterns in future games.
- Expand your opening repertoire gradually by introducing one or two new systems to surprise your opponents and broaden your understanding.
- Practice endgame studies focusing on both offensive conversions and resilient defense mechanisms.
- Use longer time controls occasionally to deepen understanding of critical positions that arise from your usual openings.
Looking Ahead
Your current rating trajectory is positive, reflecting an 8-point increase in the past month and an encouraging 105 points gained over six months. Keep building on this momentum, and focus on the fine-tuning areas mentioned above to break through new rating plateaus.
Remember, consistent study combined with practical experience is key to continued success. Stay patient and maintain your enthusiasm for sharp, strategic chess!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Anthony Wirig | 0W / 2L / 1D | |
| Ivan Vihor Krsnik Cohar | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Shelev Oberoi | 5W / 6L / 0D | |
| Jan Malek | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| ixcii | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Petros Trimitzios | 11W / 13L / 3D | |
| xinrudaoge | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| aleksandre_gonghadze | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sidorenja1979 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| 12rbf | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1f3_2g41-0 | 30W / 23L / 7D | |
| German Bazeev | 7W / 23L / 7D | |
| Kevin Bordi | 19W / 15L / 3D | |
| white_ghost | 8W / 25L / 3D | |
| donut870 | 31W / 3L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2807 | 2925 | ||
| 2024 | 2873 | 2801 | 2437 | |
| 2023 | 2797 | 2811 | 2453 | |
| 2022 | 2748 | 1960 | 2453 | |
| 2021 | 2823 | 2760 | 2453 | |
| 2020 | 2705 | 2587 | 2464 | 1861 |
| 2019 | 2582 | 1871 | 1857 | |
| 2018 | 2433 | 2294 | ||
| 2017 | 1905 | 2122 | 2017 | |
| 2016 | 1763 | |||
| 2015 | 1555 | 1647 | 1650 | 1200 |
| 2014 | 1310 | 1517 | 1590 | |
| 2013 | 1233 | 1222 | 1369 | |
| 2012 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 64W / 45L / 11D | 68W / 50L / 9D | 84.2 |
| 2024 | 243W / 165L / 52D | 212W / 205L / 39D | 93.2 |
| 2023 | 309W / 173L / 48D | 242W / 221L / 33D | 85.9 |
| 2022 | 165W / 72L / 26D | 127W / 103L / 20D | 82.5 |
| 2021 | 333W / 202L / 49D | 296W / 224L / 54D | 86.4 |
| 2020 | 171W / 80L / 26D | 157W / 91L / 34D | 81.4 |
| 2019 | 121W / 58L / 15D | 110W / 61L / 16D | 73.1 |
| 2018 | 405W / 191L / 34D | 377W / 216L / 35D | 72.9 |
| 2017 | 69W / 36L / 7D | 65W / 39L / 5D | 65.8 |
| 2016 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 64.7 |
| 2015 | 12W / 8L / 0D | 11W / 8L / 1D | 64.8 |
| 2014 | 29W / 13L / 1D | 28W / 10L / 2D | 74.0 |
| 2013 | 39W / 22L / 3D | 34W / 30L / 1D | 44.4 |
| 2012 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 28.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 664 | 370 | 233 | 61 | 55.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 357 | 181 | 147 | 29 | 50.7% |
| Unknown | 246 | 153 | 90 | 3 | 62.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 117 | 66 | 44 | 7 | 56.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 117 | 62 | 40 | 15 | 53.0% |
| Modern | 97 | 51 | 38 | 8 | 52.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 96 | 61 | 29 | 6 | 63.5% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 84 | 43 | 34 | 7 | 51.2% |
| Australian Defense | 75 | 41 | 31 | 3 | 54.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 61 | 35 | 18 | 8 | 57.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1045 | 617 | 343 | 85 | 59.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 252 | 143 | 87 | 22 | 56.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 238 | 120 | 101 | 17 | 50.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 238 | 120 | 95 | 23 | 50.4% |
| Australian Defense | 143 | 71 | 57 | 15 | 49.6% |
| Modern | 133 | 69 | 58 | 6 | 51.9% |
| Czech Defense | 64 | 37 | 22 | 5 | 57.8% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 58 | 29 | 25 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Modern Defense | 56 | 38 | 15 | 3 | 67.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 48 | 24 | 18 | 6 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 29 | 22 | 7 | 0 | 75.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 69.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 13 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 46.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 16.7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 0.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 37.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 16.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Tiviakov Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.e3 O-O | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 45 | 0 |
| Losing | 16 | 2 |