Biography
Roy Vagman is an International Master renowned for their razor-sharp play in blitz and rapid formats. They earned the FIDE title after years of disciplined study, fearless calculation, and a stubborn love for dynamic positions. Known for their quick instincts and deep preparation, they blend tactical flair with solid endgame technique to keep opponents honest in every time scramble.
In the fast-paced world of online and over-the-board chess, their Blitz peak has soared to 2850, achieved in May 2025, marking them as one of the era’s elite speed players. Their Bullet peak reached 2786 in April 2025, and their Rapid peak sits near 2300 from December 2024. Learn more about their profile in royvaglman handsomely there, if you’re curious about the milestones behind these numbers.
Career highlights
- Title: International Master (FIDE)
- Notable strength in blitz, with a peak Blitz rating of 2850 in May 2025
- Longest recorded winning streak: 16 games
- Versatile repertoire across openings, from sharp gambits to solid, modern systems
Opening repertoire and performance
Roy’s games feature a wide and creative opening toolkit, with particular success in aggressive and dynamic lines. They excel in both surprise gambits and well-prepared, flexible systems.
- Amar Gambit — strong results, frequently chosen in blitz for its practical chances
- Modern — lively and challenging with active piece play
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation — solid, with chances to seize initiative
- Scandinavian Defense — practical, combative lines that test opponents’ plans
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack — a versatile surprise weapon against a range of setups
- Sicilian Defense (various lines) — occasional sharp departures when the moment calls for bite
Playing style
Roy plays with tempo and psychology in mind: they convert small advantages into pressure, prefer practical over theoretical lines in complex positions, and relish endgame duels where precision matters. Their approach blends brisk tactical awareness with patient endgame technique, making them a formidable opponent in any format.
- Preferred time control: Blitz
- Endgame frequency: high, with especially careful conversion in close games
- White win rate is slightly above 50%, reflecting balanced results across colors
Fun and flair
Off the board, Roy is known for a sharp sense of humor and a soft spot for puzzles and coffee. They approach chess with a curious mind and an enjoyably competitive spirit that lights up the room at events.
Illustrative moments
Representative, game-like flavor can be seen in these placeholders for deep analysis:
Illustrative game snippet:
Profile link for quick reference: royvagman
Overall impression
You play blitz with clear tactical intent and a willingness to complicate positions when the clock is ticking. Your willingness to go for forcing lines can hand you quick, advantageous wins, but it also risks getting tangled in sharp melees where a small misstep costs the game. There’s a nice long‑term improvement trend, so the work you’re doing week to week is paying off even if the near-term results wobble.
What you’re doing well
- You show courage in dynamic openings and are comfortable stepping into unbalanced middlegames, which suits blitz where practical calculation and initiative matter more than perfect structure.
- Your attack ideas frequently press and constrain your opponent, often forcing imprecise defenses and creating practical chances to win material or the initiative.
- You have a versatile opening sense, doing well in several aggressive families (Modern, Amar Gambit style lines, and related dynamic setups), which keeps your opponents guessing and helps you capitalize on aggressive game plans.
Areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: there are moments where you dive into deep variations or multiple tactical ideas and spend too long on a single decision. Build a simple time budget: aim to decide most moves within 20–40 seconds in the early middlegame and reserve longer thought for clearly critical moments.
- Endgame technique and conversion: several games drift into endgame where precise technique matters to convert a small edge or force a draw. Practice common rook endings, basic king activity plans, and simple pawn race concepts so you can finish with confidence.
- Trade decisions: be mindful of trades that dissolve your initiative or simplify to a game you’re less comfortable with. Trade to improve your position or when it clearly increases your winning chances; otherwise keep pieces on the board to maintain pressure.
- King safety when pushing aggression: in some sharp lines, your king can become exposed if you overextend. Balance aggression with a reminder to keep a safe haven for your king or to secure king safety with timely development or castling.
Opening and plan notes
Your openings show a strength in dynamic, initiative‑driven paths (Modern Defense, Amar Gambit, Elephant Gambit, etc.), but you sometimes encounter more solid, slower setups (like Caro‑Kann) where plan and structure matter more than tactical flair. Consider two ideas to enact consistency and growth:
- Solid core repertoire: keep 2–3 reliable lines that fit your style and study the typical middlegame plans and piece placements that arise, so you can transition smoothly from the opening to your attacking plans without getting sidetracked by adjustments.
- Counterplay awareness: for each chosen line, be ready with a clear plan against common solid defenses. Know the natural squares for your pieces in the first 8–12 moves and how to activate rooks and the queen in the middlegame rather than chasing tactics aimlessly.
Training plan for the next week
- Daily 15–20 tactical puzzles focused on patterns you’ve used in your favored openings (forks, discovered attacks, overloading, back‑rank motifs). Review why the tactic works and what defensive cues you missed.
- Three blitz sessions with strict time control, followed by a 2–3 sentence self‑review about where time was wasted or where you could have chosen a simpler plan.
- Endgame drills: practice rook endings and king‑and‑pawn endings, focusing on keeping the king active and using passed pawns to create a winning plan.
- Review two recent blitz losses or a difficult game with notes on the critical transition where you could have chosen a safer simplification or a different constructive plan.
Practical next steps
If you want to revisit your recent games for ongoing improvement, you can reflect on patterns you notice in the win vs. the loss vs. the draw. For targeted practice, consider repeating the Modern and Amar Gambit lines you enjoy, and pair them with a reliable, slower system as a fallback when opponents push into less familiar territory. If you’d like, I can tailor a short 2‑week plan around your preferred openings and typical middlegame plans.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| daybeers | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| js2606 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| afarsek17 | 5W / 0L / 1D | View |
| girlsundpanzer02 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Delusional_Knight | 0W / 0L / 2D | View |
| prime-morty | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| balkandadchess | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| BSWPaulsen | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| 11fc | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Tamaz Mgeladze | 3W / 5L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Itay Sitbon | 50W / 39L / 12D | View Games |
| Ilay Zakin | 56W / 25L / 17D | View Games |
| Dana Kochavi | 39W / 3L / 1D | View Games |
| beautifulbird07 | 16W / 21L / 6D | View Games |
| Johnathan Bakalchuk | 23W / 16L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2700 | 2765 | ||
| 2024 | 2623 | 2632 | 2300 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 343W / 263L / 60D | 313W / 277L / 79D | 74.6 |
| 2024 | 114W / 78L / 20D | 114W / 86L / 20D | 89.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 33 | 12 | 19 | 2 | 36.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 24 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 70.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 22 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Australian Defense | 20 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 55.0% |
| Modern | 19 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 68.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 68.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 14 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 21.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 61.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| King's Indian Attack | 12 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 246 | 121 | 121 | 4 | 49.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 74 | 31 | 33 | 10 | 41.9% |
| Modern | 59 | 37 | 19 | 3 | 62.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 49 | 20 | 20 | 9 | 40.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 45 | 21 | 19 | 5 | 46.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 44 | 24 | 16 | 4 | 54.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 34 | 18 | 11 | 5 | 52.9% |
| Elephant Gambit | 29 | 16 | 9 | 4 | 55.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 25 | 11 | 11 | 3 | 44.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 24 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 1 |