Sasha Mongeli - Woman FIDE Master and Chess Aficionado
Sasha Mongeli, also known by the username mong2069, is a talented Woman FIDE Master with a flair for turning the chessboard into a battlefield of wits and wit. Rising through the ranks since 2016, Sasha’s journey began with a Blitz rating of 1344 and has seen remarkable progress, reaching a peak Blitz rating of 1947 in 2023—proving that once Sasha locks eyes on the king, there’s little chance of escape.
Known for a tactical awareness that reads like a crime thriller, Sasha boasts a 100% win rate after losing a piece—a comeback specialist whose motto might just be “losing a rook? No problem, watch this!” Their longest winning streak is an impressive 10 games, a testament to their fierce fighting spirit.
Whether playing Bullet, Rapid, Blitz, or Daily games, Sasha approaches chess like a symphony conductor, blending precision with creativity. Always ready for a strategic battle, Sasha’s preferred openings remain a “Top Secret” (because why spoil the surprise?), but statistics show a robust win rate of over 55% in Rapid games and solid results across all time controls.
Off the board, Sasha’s psychological profile is intriguing: while the tilt factor (chess-speak for frustration) sits at a modest 48, the resilience shines through with a remarkable 78% comeback rate. The average moves per win hover around 65, indicating a chess marathoner who enjoys the deep intricacies rather than quick knockouts.
When not strategizing checkmates, Sasha loves engaging with a diverse range of opponents—from familiar rivals like berlin_wa11 to the ever-unpredictable tal_1959. With a win rate swinging as high as 100% against some opponents (and a humble 0% against a few tough cookies), every game is a new adventure.
In sum, Sasha Mongeli is a fierce competitor with a mind sharp enough to see the Queen coming from a mile away and a playful spirit that keeps the game fun—chess might be serious, but Sasha’s profile suggests a grandmaster-level sense of humor waiting to rescue a lost pawn.
Hi Sasha (mong2069) – Post-Match Assessment & Improvement Plan
1. What you are already doing well
- Aggressive opening repertoire. 1.d4 and the Benko/Benoni structures clearly suit your appetite for dynamic positions. Your most-recent blitz win versus tal_1959 shows confident pawn sacrifices to open lines and generate initiative.
- Tactical alertness. Forks such as 34.Nb6+ and the resource 37.Nxf8+ highlight good calculation speed.
- Practical fighting spirit. You keep posing problems even when accuracy slips, forcing opponents into their own time trouble – a valuable blitz skill.
- Peak rating: 1947 (2023-01-15) demonstrates that you can already compete solidly in the 1900 zone.
2. Key growth areas
- Time management consistency. Roughly 40 % of your decisive results come from the clock (both wins and losses). Build a rhythm: opening moves ≤ 5 seconds, critical middlegame decisions 20-30 seconds, simplify early when under 45 seconds.
- Converting winning positions. In the Tal_1959 game you were a full rook up by move 29 yet needed ten extra checks before the flag fell. Practise “simple is strong”: trade queens or return material for a clean ending instead of perpetual checks.
- Benko defence technique. Your most-recent loss (daily game vs. badeend70) shows three common Benko problems:
- …Bxf1 on move 8 deprived you of your best attacking bishop.
- Premature …Rfb8/…Rb7 let White consolidate on the b-file.
- Lack of central counterplay (…e6/…e5 ideas) allowed White to keep the extra pawn.
- Endgame fundamentals. Several blitz games ended with a rook-and-pawn ending that could have been simplified earlier. Revisit the “Lucena” and “Philidor” setups and the concept of the outside passed pawn.
3. Opening tune-ups for the next two weeks
| Your side | Quick tweak | Why it helps |
|---|---|---|
| White vs. Benko | Adopt 8.a4 & 9.Nf3 lines (solid build-up, minimise theory). | Keeps extra pawn and avoids the messy …c4 push you faced. |
| Black in Benko | Test the …e6 Benko: 5…e6 6.dxe6 fxe6. | Adds centre control and equalises material faster. |
| Anti-1.e4 (blitz) | Avoid early …g6 in the Caro-Kann; choose the solid 7…Be7 line. | Reduces the loosening of dark squares seen in your 0-1 loss. |
4. Middlegame checklist
Before every critical move, ask yourself:
- “What does my opponent threaten?” – basic prophylaxis.
- “Can I improve my worst piece?” – typical Benko/Benoni rule.
- “If the queens were traded now, would I still be better?” – encourages clean conversions.
5. Weekly training menu (approx. 3–4 h total)
- 30 min x 2: Thematic puzzles with the “Zwischenzug / intermediate move” tag – builds tactical depth.
- 45 min: Play 3 rook-and-pawn endings vs. engine set to 1800. Aim for textbook technique.
- 1 h: Analyse one of your own wins without an engine. Then compare to engine evaluation – this sharpens self-diagnosis.
- 30 min: Watch a Benko strategy video (centre-break timing & piece trades).
6. Progress tracker
7. Quick motivational note
“When you see a good move, look for a simpler one.” — Adapted for Sasha’s blitz play
Keep the energy, tame the clock, and polish those endgames. See you at the next milestone!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| berlin_wa11 | 9W / 61L / 4D | View Games |
| demonul929 | 7W / 16L / 4D | View Games |
| tal_1959 | 5W / 10L / 0D | View Games |
| esurytas | 6W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| habibachahed | 3W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1816 | 2006 | 1111 | |
| 2024 | 1448 | 1813 | 1273 | |
| 2023 | 1497 | 1813 | 2006 | 1303 |
| 2022 | 1553 | 1928 | 1916 | 1406 |
| 2021 | 1266 | 1681 | 1837 | 1374 |
| 2020 | 1290 | 1615 | 1602 | 1375 |
| 2019 | 882 | 1253 | 1277 | 1223 |
| 2018 | 1421 | |||
| 2017 | 1181 | 1264 | 800 | |
| 2016 | 1344 | 1344 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16W / 43L / 2D | 10W / 49L / 2D | 58.7 |
| 2024 | 10W / 11L / 0D | 8W / 16L / 0D | 35.4 |
| 2023 | 82W / 74L / 16D | 66W / 88L / 16D | 66.4 |
| 2022 | 117W / 109L / 13D | 123W / 100L / 17D | 67.0 |
| 2021 | 84W / 69L / 16D | 67W / 74L / 15D | 68.6 |
| 2020 | 128W / 79L / 14D | 114W / 100L / 15D | 61.0 |
| 2019 | 16W / 15L / 1D | 18W / 12L / 1D | 62.3 |
| 2018 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 1D | 99.6 |
| 2017 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 0W / 4L / 0D | 35.7 |
| 2016 | 2W / 3L / 0D | 3W / 0L / 0D | 61.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 42 | 25 | 8 | 9 | 59.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 40 | 18 | 16 | 6 | 45.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 16 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 75.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation | 11 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 18.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Elephant Gambit | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Opening* | 21 | 8 | 13 | 0 | 38.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 14 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 11 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 27.3% |
| KGD: Falkbeer, Marshall/Nimzowitsch, 4.dxc6 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Petrov's Defense | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 22.2% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 68 | 28 | 33 | 7 | 41.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 29 | 13 | 13 | 3 | 44.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 25 | 15 | 7 | 3 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 23 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 30.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 23 | 10 | 11 | 2 | 43.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation | 20 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 50.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 18 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 69.2% |
| Petrov's Defense | 12 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 120 | 54 | 60 | 6 | 45.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 50 | 24 | 24 | 2 | 48.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 44 | 30 | 13 | 1 | 68.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 38 | 26 | 10 | 2 | 68.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 31 | 14 | 16 | 1 | 45.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 26 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 25 | 11 | 13 | 1 | 44.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation | 24 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 41.7% |
| Australian Defense | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 17 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 35.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 0 |
| Losing | 48 | 5 |