Georgi Filev - The FIDE Master Behind the Board
Known in the chess world as morphy1984, Georgi Filev has earned the prestigious title of FIDE Master, proving that he's no mere mortal on 64 squares. His rating zigzags have been as thrilling as a Sicilian Defense, with peak blitz ratings soaring beyond the 2800 mark — a feat only achievable by mortals who casually make grandmasters break into a sweat.
Georgi's journey began in the ranks, blossoming into a blitz specialist with over 6,700 games under his belt in that lightning-fast format alone. His opening repertoire is a guarded secret — quite literally — as the "Top Secret" opening has been his trusty weapon in most games. If you think that sounds mysterious, you haven’t seen his opponents scratching their heads post-match.
In rapid and bullet formats, Georgi switches gears but still displays commanding performance, pushing bullet ratings close to 2770. Bullet is like speed chess on caffeine and adrenaline, but Georgi seems to handle it with the composure of a zen master avoiding traffic.
Playing Style & Personality:
His games reveal a tactician with a high comeback rate of over 90%, meaning if you catch him off guard, don't relax — he's probably plotting your demise. Endgames? Georgi is no stranger, showing an impressive 84% frequency of endgame appearances, proving he’s comfortable closing the curtain. And resignation is not in his vocabulary early; his early resignation rate is 0%, he fights every move like it’s a showdown in a spaghetti western.
Aside from his serious stamping of authority on the board, Georgi also exhibits a fun side, occasionally tipping the scales against his opponents with cool psychological resilience despite a modest tilt factor of 13 (he's human after all). He's most deadly when the clock strikes 2 AM, a mysterious "best time of day to play" that adds to his legend.
Among his favorite victories was a recent triumph over Brewington_Hardaway with a flawless execution in the French Defense, Classical Steinitz Boleslavsky Variation. You can relive his moves at this epic clash — a true masterclass in technique and nerve.
Whether blitz, rapid, or bullet, Georgi Filev stands as a testament to dedication and love for the game. Opponents beware: behind that calm username hides a storm of tactical genius ready to unfold at a moment’s notice.
Feedback for Georgi Filev — recent rapid games
Great work overall. You showed versatility in your opening choices, and your results in several sharp lines indicate you handle tactical, out-of-the-book positions with confidence. The recent games also suggest you are building momentum over the longer term. The following notes focus on what you’re doing well and practical steps to improve further, especially for rapid time controls.
What you’re doing well
- You handle a diverse opening repertoire with confidence. You’ve performed well in aggressive lines such as the Sicilian Najdorf, the Scandi, the Italian Two Knights setup, and the Czech Defense, showing you can steer fast games into dynamic middlegames and keep pressure on your opponent.
- Your willingness to complicate positions can be a strength in rapid time controls, allowing you to generate practical chances even from less familiar lines.
- You maintain fight in tactical battles and are capable of converting advantages when you get the initiative, which is a valuable asset in rapid play.
Areas to improve
- Time management under pressure: Some games indicate you can get into tight clocks during complex middlegames. Build a simple time plan to avoid late mistakes—for example, earmark a few minutes for the critical middle game and avoid over-pressing in uncertain positions.
- Endgame conversion: In several long tactical lines, the path from advantage to full point can be delicate. Strengthen rook and minor-piece endgame technique so you can convert advantages cleanly and reduce risk of drawing or losing due to a missed resource.
- Opening depth and transitions: While your openings are strong, deepen your understanding of typical middlegame plans after your main lines. Knowing 2–3 key plans for each main opening helps you avoid drifting into passive positions when your opponent deviates from the book.
- Post-game analysis routine: After a game, write a quick recap focusing on the turning point, one or two decision points you’d change, and a practical improvement to apply next time. This reinforces learning and speeds up future improvement.
Opening performance snapshot
Your openings show strong results in several lines. Notably:
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation — high win rate, good at taking initiative in sharp play.
- Scandinavian Defense — undefeated in the sample, indicating solid handling of the early middlegame.
- Two Knights and Czech Defense — clean wins, suggesting comfort with dynamic piece activity and typical structural ideas.
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense — solid results with a direct, tactical approach.
- Other lines such as the Ruy Lopez family and English variants show you can adapt to different pawn structures and plans.
- Be mindful of lines with weaker results in your dataset (for example a specific French line). If you encounter it often, consider reinforcing the main ideas or selecting safer, familiar branches when under time pressure.
Training plan (next 4 weeks)
- Week 1: Daily tactics practice (15–20 minutes) focused on motifs that appear in your games, followed by a 15-minute endgame basics review (rook endings, king activity, pawn endings).
- Week 2: Deepen 1–2 core openings as White and 1–2 as Black. Write down 2–3 typical middlegame plans for each main line and practice recognizing the key ideas in 5-minute review sessions after each game.
- Week 3: Increase endgame emphasis. Solve rook-and-pawn and minor-piece endgame exercises; play training games focusing on converting slight advantages into a win.
- Week 4: Post-game summaries. After every game, note the critical moment, an alternative decision, and one concrete improvement. Start applying the chosen improvement in the next few games.
Practical tips for your next sessions
- Use a simple time plan: allocate roughly equal thought to the first 15 moves in sharp games, then reassess. If still unclear, switch to safety moves that maintain activity rather than chasing complications.
- When you gain a tangible edge, look for a clear plan to convert it (avoid swapping into bare complications that give your opponent practical chances).
- Keep a mental note of recurring tactical motifs in your games (overloaded pieces, back-rank weaknesses, exposed king). Target one motif per week in a focused set of puzzles.
Encouragement
Your progress over the recent period is visible. By tightening time management, reinforcing endgame technique, and consolidating a focused repertoire, you can sustain rapid improvement and convert more of your promising positions into clean wins.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| adam657 | 3W / 3L / 0D | |
| Seyed Poormosavi | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| FarewellToKings2112 | 3W / 4L / 0D | |
| Daniel Girsh | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| halfiscrayfish | 0W / 2L / 1D | |
| icecreamiscream | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Evgenij Shuvalov | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| premier05 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| laijfer | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| genrikh_king | 5W / 0L / 2D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ludogorec | 591W / 394L / 79D | |
| sabo0tagee | 196W / 108L / 27D | |
| slabalachkov | 122W / 152L / 47D | |
| Tamaz Mgeladze | 38W / 62L / 21D | |
| kaeron | 102W / 9L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2806 | |||
| 2024 | 2725 | 2773 | ||
| 2023 | 2734 | 2719 | ||
| 2022 | 2707 | 2723 | 2333 | |
| 2021 | 2647 | 2713 | 1453 | |
| 2020 | 2741 | 2701 | ||
| 2019 | 2639 | |||
| 2018 | 2511 | |||
| 2017 | 2523 | 1200 | ||
| 2016 | 2544 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 112W / 156L / 44D | 98W / 172L / 44D | 88.0 |
| 2024 | 133W / 133L / 39D | 110W / 169L / 28D | 88.6 |
| 2023 | 145W / 148L / 35D | 131W / 153L / 51D | 86.8 |
| 2022 | 221W / 187L / 49D | 188W / 238L / 42D | 84.3 |
| 2021 | 283W / 238L / 60D | 226W / 295L / 55D | 83.1 |
| 2020 | 747W / 496L / 99D | 682W / 537L / 118D | 81.5 |
| 2019 | 114W / 107L / 32D | 97W / 122L / 33D | 89.2 |
| 2018 | 154W / 121L / 27D | 138W / 137L / 35D | 88.3 |
| 2017 | 255W / 221L / 57D | 234W / 241L / 51D | 86.3 |
| 2016 | 106W / 35L / 10D | 94W / 45L / 12D | 86.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 763 | 323 | 376 | 64 | 42.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 266 | 128 | 112 | 26 | 48.1% |
| Scotch Game | 259 | 104 | 124 | 31 | 40.1% |
| Australian Defense | 205 | 110 | 76 | 19 | 53.7% |
| Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense | 205 | 104 | 76 | 25 | 50.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 200 | 93 | 84 | 23 | 46.5% |
| Modern | 177 | 81 | 75 | 21 | 45.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 160 | 87 | 55 | 18 | 54.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 124 | 56 | 47 | 21 | 45.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 112 | 48 | 52 | 12 | 42.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 315 | 166 | 130 | 19 | 52.7% |
| Australian Defense | 112 | 52 | 47 | 13 | 46.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 71 | 30 | 31 | 10 | 42.2% |
| Modern Defense | 70 | 26 | 40 | 4 | 37.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 59 | 31 | 22 | 6 | 52.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 59 | 26 | 24 | 9 | 44.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 49 | 22 | 20 | 7 | 44.9% |
| Philidor Defense | 49 | 22 | 23 | 4 | 44.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 49 | 22 | 24 | 3 | 44.9% |
| Modern | 49 | 26 | 21 | 2 | 53.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 36 | 3 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |