Matyas Marek - International Master of Chess
Known in the chess realm as MrMatesM, Matyas Marek is an accomplished International Master who has danced on the 64 squares with remarkable finesse. A true tactician, Matyas’s style boasts a stunning 92.2% comeback rate and an almost mythical 98.83% win rate after losing a piece—proving that even when down, giving up is not in their vocabulary.
Rating Odyssey: The Rise of a Blitz Maestro
Starting from a modest blitz rating of 1800 in 2017, Matyas quickly blitzed their way up the ranks, peaking impressively at 2813 in 2024. Not just a flash in the pan, their steady average blitz rating of 2700+ from 2023 onwards showcases consistency rare among the chess elite.
Bullet, Rapid, and Daily: Jack of All Time Controls
Bullet chess? Matyas reaches speeds topping 2742 rating points with a win rate tipping 55%! Rapid chess? A nearly unbeatable 97.8% win rate in shorter games, with a peak rapid rating of 2767. Daily chess may be slower-paced, but even there Matyas registers solid performances.
Playing Style & Psychology
Smooth and strategic, Matyas averages over 80 moves per win—a marathon player who knows how to outlast foes. The endgame is their playground with an 82.81% endgame frequency. They tend to resist early resignations except for the truly dire situations (only 1.44% early resignation rate), showcasing supreme fighting spirit.
Now, about their tilt factor: at a manageable 10, it means Matyas is human after all—flustered sometimes, but not crushed. And despite having a bit of a harder time in rated versus casual games, you'd better watch out; the strength is undeniable.
Opening Wizardry: Top Secret
Matyas likes to keep the opening repertoire “Top Secret," where they hold a respectable 52.5% win rate in blitz and an even more cunning 55.2% in bullet chess. The mystery probably keeps the opponents guessing...
Memorable Streaks & Rivals
With a longest winning streak of 15 games and still going strong on a current 2-game streak, this player knows how to get hot and stay hot. Famous for varied encounters, Matyas holds a 100% win rate against some recent opponents (covichess, rakitic2010, and others) — no mercy in the arena!
Fun Facts
- White pieces win rate: 56.36%, Black pieces: 49.23% (because who really loves playing second fiddle?)
- Avg moves per victory are higher than average, signaling patience that frustrates and defeats foes
- Has a unique ability to snatch wins right after losing a piece; basically a chess Houdini
In conclusion, Matyas Marek is a formidable chess beast; a player who combines resilience, strategy, and lightning-fast tactics. When you sit across from MrMatesM, be prepared for a battle of wits, speed, and stubborn endurance. Whether it's blitz, bullet, or rapid, Matyas is always ready to prove that chess is not just a game—it's an adventure.
Feedback for Matyas Marek (MrMatesM)
Matyas, you have demonstrated strong strategic thinking and solid practical skills in your recent games. Here are some key observations and suggestions to help you continue improving:
Strengths
- Opening Repertoire: You have a consistent and sound opening approach, especially with the Reti and King's Indian Attack setups as White, and Sicilian Defense systems with Black. Your understanding of these openings allows for smooth development and creates good middlegame structures.
- Endgame Technique: Your endgame play is precise, as demonstrated in your recent victory where promotion tactics and king activity secured the win. Maintaining focus and converting slight advantages consistently is a great asset.
- Calculation and Tactical Awareness: Throughout your wins, you showed good tactical vision to convert advantages, including recognizing opportunities to simplify or immediately punish opponent inaccuracies.
Areas to Improve
- Handling Complex Positions: In some losses, there appeared to be difficulties in maneuvering out of tactical or positional pressure, particularly facing complex pawn structures or dynamic imbalances. Spending additional time reviewing such positions with engine assistance or study may reveal typical motifs and resources.
- Accuracy Under Time Pressure: A few games show rapid transitions where quicker decisions were needed. Working on quicker pattern recognition and pre-move plans in familiar lines might help reduce errors during fast time controls.
- Middle Game Planning: Sometimes a plan seemed slightly unclear after the opening phase, especially when pawn breaks or minor piece exchanges occurred. Focusing on key strategic goals—such as target weaknesses, piece coordination, and space occupation—could enhance your positional decisions.
Suggestions for Training
- Study thematic endgames related to your preferred pawn structures to deepen your mastery and confidence in close endgames.
- Analyze your recent losses, especially key turning points where you felt difficulties, and look for alternative candidate moves or better plans.
- Practice tactical exercises daily, focusing on typical motifs in your openings and recurring game themes.
- Consider going over some master games in your chosen openings, focusing on how they transition from opening to middlegame.
Keep up the strong work, Matyas! Your solid foundation is a great platform for higher performance, and with targeted study on the above points, you will continue to raise your level.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| kennybolli | 5W / 1L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tiago Pereira Rodrigues | 26W / 20L / 6D | |
| Mai Narva | 13W / 24L / 3D | |
| BSWPaulsen | 19W / 17L / 2D | |
| Nicolas De La Colina | 17W / 13L / 5D | |
| Nebojsa Djordjevic | 10W / 13L / 8D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2717 | 2900 | 2674 | 1742 |
| 2024 | 2742 | 2778 | 2674 | |
| 2023 | 2688 | 2704 | 2670 | |
| 2022 | 2767 | 2400 | ||
| 2021 | 2609 | 2659 | 2400 | 1742 |
| 2020 | 2668 | 2586 | 2400 | 2000 |
| 2019 | 2425 | 2508 | ||
| 2018 | 2393 | 2512 | ||
| 2017 | 2293 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 232W / 150L / 36D | 194W / 167L / 46D | 90.3 |
| 2024 | 280W / 167L / 63D | 258W / 189L / 63D | 86.3 |
| 2023 | 227W / 122L / 45D | 196W / 150L / 48D | 89.0 |
| 2022 | 104W / 68L / 16D | 100W / 81L / 17D | 75.6 |
| 2021 | 453W / 294L / 68D | 424W / 328L / 58D | 76.3 |
| 2020 | 572W / 343L / 92D | 446W / 440L / 101D | 82.6 |
| 2019 | 801W / 499L / 111D | 668W / 606L / 126D | 82.9 |
| 2018 | 570W / 370L / 73D | 506W / 410L / 69D | 80.7 |
| 2017 | 10W / 6L / 0D | 10W / 3L / 1D | 84.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 1537 | 866 | 532 | 139 | 56.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 539 | 281 | 228 | 30 | 52.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 498 | 249 | 203 | 46 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 464 | 280 | 153 | 31 | 60.3% |
| King's Indian Attack | 404 | 234 | 131 | 39 | 57.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 377 | 189 | 133 | 55 | 50.1% |
| Benko Gambit | 319 | 170 | 126 | 23 | 53.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 281 | 134 | 126 | 21 | 47.7% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 275 | 124 | 123 | 28 | 45.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 269 | 132 | 111 | 26 | 49.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Opening* | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 31 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 64.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 29 | 13 | 13 | 3 | 44.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 27 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 25 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 68.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 22 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 22 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 68.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 21 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 52.4% |
| Czech Defense | 21 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 20 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 70.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 1 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |