Naruna_Chan: A Dynamic Chess Competitor
Naruna_Chan is a versatile and passionate chess player whose journey over the past decade illustrates a deep commitment to the art and science of the game. Making an entry onto the competitive scene in 2017 with a sharp blitz rating, Naruna_Chan quickly showcased an aptitude for fast-paced, tactical battles and steadily refined their play across multiple time formats.
In blitz chess, Naruna_Chan’s rating has seen a gradual yet impressive evolution—from a respectable 2125 in 2017 to an even higher 2277 by 2025. This upward trajectory is mirrored in other formats: with rapidly climbing bullet and rapid scores that highlight not only versatility but also an excellent grasp of both speed and endurance in play. The experience across different time controls has enriched their tactical awareness, with comeback rates nearing 90% and the rare display of one‐sided losses, underscoring a resilient fighting spirit.
The player’s opening repertoire is a testament to their depth of study and adaptability. Naruna_Chan has experimented with and mastered a wide variety of lines—from the intricacies of the Alapin Sicilian Defense in bullet encounters to classical rapid choices like the Giuoco Piano and Ruy Lopez. Such diversity in openings is complemented by a calculated playing style that emphasizes a high endgame frequency and a balanced approach – with average move counts in wins and losses hovering in the mid-seventies, indicating a commitment to strategic buildup throughout the game.
Not only do the numbers tell a story of steady improvement and adaptability, but Naruna_Chan’s statistical profile in psychological and time performance trends paints the picture of a player who remains composed under pressure. Whether it’s performing consistently across the days of the week or during various hours of the day, the data suggests an individual who is both methodical and resilient. A modest tilt factor and a remarkable ability to transform setbacks into opportunities highlight their determination to come back strong when the going gets tough.
Over the years, Naruna_Chan has built up an impressive record against a varied field of opponents, learning from every encounter and refining their game to find new ways to challenge the competition. With a disciplined approach, a passion for improvement, and a history of steadily advancing ratings across blitz, bullet, and rapid formats, Naruna_Chan stands as an inspiring figure in modern chess—a player who combines tactical acumen with psychological resilience to flourish on the board.
Hi Naruna Chan!
Quick snapshot
- Peak blitz rating: 2456 (2024-04-23)
- Overall performance graphs:
What you are already doing well
- Healthy repertoire built around 1.e4
You handle French-type structures comfortably (e.g. your French Exchange win on 21 May) and score well in open e-pawn games as Black (Berlin-style wins vs andinagar and joukom). - Practical tactical eye
In the Owens-Defence game (gautamsharma30) you spotted 26.Rxb7+!! to rip open the queenside and force resignation soon after. Your games often feature tactical themes such as overloaded pieces and clearance sacrifices. - Good sense of initiative
You rarely shy away from pawn breaks (d4–d5, f-pawn pushes, etc.) which keeps your opponents under pressure.
Largest growth areas
- Clock management
Four of your last six losses were decided by time forfeiture or early abandonment. In the 60-second game vs mrhajieff you spent ~55 % of your time by move 20.
• Enter each game with a simple rhythm (e.g. “openings at ~1 sec/move, reserve 15 sec after move 20”).
• Add an incremental time control when training to reinforce quick yet accurate moves. - Pawn-storm discipline
Against mrhajieff you launched g- and h-pawns before completing development; the counter-strike …c5 left your king exposed and pieces uncoordinated. Stick to the rule of thumb: do not advance wing pawns aggressively until you have connected rooks or created a concrete target. - End-game conversion
Wins vs Andinagar and joukom show good technique, but the lost rook-ending against DerDistelfink highlighted missed tempo moves and zugzwang ideas (see zugzwang, tempo).
• Work through 10 basic rook-ending studies per week.
• Play out winning positions vs the engine set to low depth to practise technique under time pressure.
Opening-specific suggestions
- Vs Scandinavian (…Qd8): Instead of 5.Be3, consider 5.Nf3 6.Be2 to castle quickly; it reduces Black’s …c5 counterplay that hurt you on 4 Jun.
- Closed Sicilian as White: Your setup (Nc3, Bc4, d3, h3) is solid, but early 6.h3 yielded no benefit and cost a tempo in the loss to VedantSalvi. Try 6.Be3 or 6.Bg5 with quicker queenside expansion.
- French Exchange as White: You already handle it well—add the 4.Bd3 sideline to fight for an attacking structure if Black plays …c5 early.
Action plan for the next two weeks
- Daily: 15 min tactics; note each motif you fail and revisit after two days.
- Every other day: One 15+10 game focusing solely on clock discipline (no premoves).
- Weekend: Analyse one of your own end-games without an engine, then compare to engine suggestions.
- Opening lab: Build a five-line “anti-Scandinavian” file and a two-line Closed-Sicilian improvement; rehearse them with the opening explorer.
Stay consistent and keep the games flowing—your tactical flair already makes you dangerous; tightening up those few structural and time issues will push you well beyond the 2200 mark. Good luck!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ignacio Raviolo | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| maskito1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| iwantend | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sultanyagmur | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| aarush21032007 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| b-crawford | 0W / 2L / 1D | |
| c3d2 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| niksmbidkar | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| shoura | 3W / 3L / 0D | |
| ziba-ot | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| timeless limitless | 25W / 24L / 2D | |
| igorekt | 25W / 14L / 1D | |
| petr_s_11 | 17W / 7L / 12D | |
| peachrings9 | 16W / 15L / 0D | |
| melonlord_levi_gray | 19W / 9L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2165 | 2320 | 1983 | |
| 2024 | 2116 | 2188 | 1935 | |
| 2022 | 2225 | 2153 | 1346 | |
| 2021 | 2073 | 2222 | 1217 | |
| 2020 | 2249 | 2286 | 1332 | |
| 2019 | 2029 | 2138 | ||
| 2018 | 1639 | 2143 | ||
| 2017 | 2125 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 149W / 128L / 22D | 135W / 143L / 19D | 83.3 |
| 2024 | 257W / 234L / 41D | 247W / 249L / 36D | 78.6 |
| 2022 | 88W / 61L / 4D | 77W / 68L / 6D | 64.5 |
| 2021 | 233W / 206L / 26D | 220W / 213L / 35D | 76.3 |
| 2020 | 68W / 38L / 6D | 58W / 47L / 5D | 83.6 |
| 2019 | 656W / 491L / 62D | 587W / 546L / 55D | 77.8 |
| 2018 | 226W / 178L / 23D | 215W / 183L / 21D | 77.5 |
| 2017 | 96W / 48L / 12D | 73W / 69L / 9D | 83.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 425 | 229 | 162 | 34 | 53.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 177 | 87 | 81 | 9 | 49.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 141 | 77 | 56 | 8 | 54.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 134 | 67 | 53 | 14 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 97 | 44 | 47 | 6 | 45.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 66 | 34 | 23 | 9 | 51.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 66 | 36 | 25 | 5 | 54.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 49 | 26 | 20 | 3 | 53.1% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 49 | 12 | 36 | 1 | 24.5% |
| Modern | 46 | 23 | 20 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 22 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 15 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 58.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 45.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 22.2% |
| Petrov's Defense | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Bishop's Opening: 3.d3 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 367 | 189 | 161 | 17 | 51.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 197 | 95 | 88 | 14 | 48.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 187 | 103 | 78 | 6 | 55.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 174 | 86 | 84 | 4 | 49.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 166 | 85 | 73 | 8 | 51.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 157 | 87 | 66 | 4 | 55.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 146 | 86 | 52 | 8 | 58.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 122 | 58 | 56 | 8 | 47.5% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 119 | 61 | 46 | 12 | 51.3% |
| Modern | 115 | 60 | 49 | 6 | 52.2% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 2 |