Meet “nengrani1234,” a versatile chess competitor who has been active since 2015. They’ve explored every format—Bullet, Blitz, Rapid, and Daily—and steadily developed a multi-faceted style. Their Bullet journey stands out: after starting near 2000, they’ve peaked at around 2459 (in 2023) and regularly maintain ratings above 2300. In Blitz, they’ve soared even higher, reaching a peak near 2577 (in 2024). Although they only occasionally play Daily games, they achieved a solid 1389 rating there, and in Rapid, they extended their range up to the 1800s.
Always looking to fight on, “nengrani1234” enters endgames in over 75% of battles and typically needs 69 moves per winning game. Their record includes a 13-game winning streak, plus a remarkable 89.99% comeback rate—showing they rarely surrender after mistakes. With a roughly 51% success rate playing White and about 47% with Black, this player has a balanced, resourceful style. They keep their early resignations low at just 1.52%, while their modest 2.62% one-sided loss rate suggests they defend well even in tough spots.
“nengrani1234” thrives on consistent improvement across seasons and hours of the day—though they’ve posted notably strong performances around midnight. Blending a tactical edge with a boldly creative approach to openings, they reflect a passion for the game that continues to evolve. Whether on a Thursday or Sunday blitz, they’re the kind of chess enthusiast who keeps pushing boundaries—someone who truly embraces the competitive and ever-challenging world of chess.
Overview of your recent bullet game activity
You shared multiple high‑stakes bullet games, including wins, losses, and draws against various opponents. The data shows a mix of opening choices and a broad range of middlegame plans. Short-term results have been volatile (a small drop in the last month) while the longer trend indicates you’re moving in a positive direction overall. Use this as motivation to lock in a compact, repeatable routine that reinforces your strengths and reduces today’s time pressure in fast games.
What you’re doing well
- Versatility in openings: You appear comfortable trying different setups, which helps you avoid being predictable in bullet games.
- Active piece play and tactical awareness: In the wins, you created pressure and activity for your opponent, converting opportunities as the position opened up.
- Momentum in longer-term improvement: The three- and six-month rating changes show solid growth, suggesting you’re learning from mistakes and building stronger patterns over time.
Key improvement areas
- Time management in fast games: Several games ended with time pressure or on time losses. Practice allocating a fixed amount of thinking time per phase of the game (opening, middlegame, endgame) and stick to it with a simple clock plan.
- Convert advantages consistently: In some games, small advantages didn’t fully convert into decisive edges. Focus on tightening conversion with concrete plans after gaining a pawn or initiative (e.g., target a pawn break, simplify to a winning endgame, or force a favorable rook endgame).
- Endgame recognition in bullet: Improve recognition of common endgame patterns (opposite-colored bishops, rook endings, can’t-miss promotion chances) so you can play faster and more accurately when the clock is tight.
- Selective opening depth: The openings data shows strong results in a few lines, but you may over-rely on flexible lines without studying typical middlegame plans. Pin down 1–2 main openings and study their typical structures and key middlegame ideas.
Openings performance guidance
Your openings show a few standout performers. You tend to do well with setups that lead to solid, strategic middlegames, and you also experiment with sharper lines. Here are practical targets:
- Prioritize the Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation and similar Colle setups where the plan is straightforward and you can practice clean development and pawn breaks. This is one of your stronger groups based on the data.
- Continue with Amar Gambit and similar dynamic lines only after you’ve built a solid memory of typical responses from both sides. Use a limited repertoire to reduce decision fatigue in bullet time controls.
- For one or two other openings (such as London System variations or Four Knights), deepen understanding of common middlegame themes so you can navigate quickly and confidently when your opponent deviates from the main lines.
Recommendation: pick 1–2 openings to specialize in for the next 4 weeks, and allocate time to study representative middlegame plans and endgames from those lines.
Actionable 4-week plan
- Week 1–2: Time management discipline
- Play a mix of 3+2 and 1+1 bullets. After each game, note the point at which you spent most time and whether you still had a clear plan.
- During practice, set a rule: after 4 moves, you should have a concrete plan for the middlegame (not just capturing pieces), or you switch to a simple, well-understood plan from your chosen openings.
- Week 3–4: Opening specialization and pattern study
- Choose 1 Colle System line and 1 Amar Gambit line as your core repertoire. Create a 2-page crib sheet with typical middlegame ideas and common pitfalls.
- Study 10 model middlegame positions from those lines and practice solving them under time pressure.
Sample training snippet
To practice quickly, you can load a short practice PGN and work through it with a timer. Example placeholder:
Keep track and review
After each training block, review your games focusing on three questions: where time was spent, what was the plan in the middlegame, and how the endgame could be handled more efficiently. This will help align your short-term results with your longer-term positive rating trends.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| lewiseisen | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Ian Ocampos | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Mihai-Lucian Grunberg | 5W / 5L / 3D | View |
| dear-ken-im-in-pieces | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| desi_tal | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Eric Lobron | 0W / 10L / 0D | View |
| hikinaka1 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| fall_yeah05 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| enitlavoruoyknird | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| shahdad2007 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gilbert Elroy Tarigan | 13W / 32L / 2D | View Games |
| Parahitha Legowo | 11W / 22L / 3D | View Games |
| jargarageman4565 | 2W / 21L / 0D | View Games |
| Azarya Jodi Setyaki | 7W / 13L / 0D | View Games |
| regitaputri | 6W / 14L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2483 | 2522 | 1810 | |
| 2024 | 2297 | 2577 | 1817 | 1389 |
| 2023 | 2296 | 2489 | 1767 | |
| 2022 | 2333 | 2374 | 1661 | |
| 2021 | 2126 | 2316 | 1603 | |
| 2020 | 2132 | 2256 | 1178 | |
| 2019 | 2059 | 2084 | ||
| 2018 | 2051 | 1756 | ||
| 2017 | 1992 | 1885 | 1396 | |
| 2016 | 2090 | 1912 | 1483 | 1396 |
| 2015 | 1860 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 592W / 616L / 56D | 497W / 675L / 86D | 77.5 |
| 2024 | 265W / 218L / 15D | 231W / 244L / 27D | 74.2 |
| 2023 | 200W / 136L / 18D | 169W / 173L / 14D | 74.4 |
| 2022 | 222W / 159L / 13D | 208W / 167L / 23D | 74.3 |
| 2021 | 58W / 30L / 5D | 44W / 47L / 4D | 68.5 |
| 2020 | 214W / 164L / 13D | 185W / 197L / 15D | 68.7 |
| 2019 | 291W / 352L / 21D | 288W / 355L / 13D | 65.8 |
| 2018 | 74W / 89L / 2D | 91W / 76L / 3D | 64.9 |
| 2017 | 81W / 90L / 3D | 87W / 90L / 4D | 63.5 |
| 2016 | 283W / 247L / 15D | 267W / 255L / 17D | 67.3 |
| 2015 | 14W / 11L / 1D | 12W / 11L / 1D | 76.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 325 | 162 | 155 | 8 | 49.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 261 | 136 | 115 | 10 | 52.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 162 | 82 | 74 | 6 | 50.6% |
| Four Knights Game | 111 | 54 | 52 | 5 | 48.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 97 | 44 | 48 | 5 | 45.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 90 | 45 | 40 | 5 | 50.0% |
| Modern Defense | 89 | 42 | 44 | 3 | 47.2% |
| Döry Defense | 85 | 39 | 42 | 4 | 45.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 82 | 47 | 35 | 0 | 57.3% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 79 | 32 | 41 | 6 | 40.5% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 222 | 120 | 96 | 6 | 54.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 177 | 72 | 92 | 13 | 40.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 128 | 68 | 49 | 11 | 53.1% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 108 | 51 | 56 | 1 | 47.2% |
| Four Knights Game | 108 | 46 | 54 | 8 | 42.6% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 105 | 54 | 45 | 6 | 51.4% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 93 | 52 | 38 | 3 | 55.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 81 | 39 | 38 | 4 | 48.1% |
| Scotch Game | 80 | 36 | 42 | 2 | 45.0% |
| Döry Defense | 76 | 42 | 30 | 4 | 55.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Catalan Opening | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Old Steinitz Defense, Semi-Duras Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 16 | 2 |