Nodar Lortkipanidze (NodariousBIG)
International Master, Chess.com Ninja
Meet Nodar Lortkipanidze, a fierce International Master who dances gracefully on the battlefield of 64 squares with the username NodariousBIG. Though the gender remains a mystery, their chess style is unmistakably bold and strategic. Nodar is known for sneaky openings like the Alapin Sicilian Defense and a love for the good ol’ top-secret moves that keep opponents guessing.
Rating-wise, Nodar has scaled the dizzying heights of 2901 in Bullet and an incredible 2950 in Blitz chess as of 2025 – proving that speed and smarts go hand in hand. This player doesn’t just dabble in quickfire games; their rapid rating peaked at a respectable 2615, and daily chess is treated with a cozy but serious 1234 rating.
Known for a remarkable comeback rate of 88.85% and a knack for turning losing positions into wins (winning 43.26% of games after losing a piece), Nodar is a master of psychological warfare. With an average game lasting about 80 moves, clearly, patience mixes well with precision here.
Fun fact: When Nodar isn’t juggling pawns or castle moves, they might be tilting just a tad (19% tilt factor) but that just adds character to the grandmaster hustle. Their best time of day to play? A mysterious 2 AM wizardry session that catches opponents off guard.
Playing Style & Personality
- Famous for not quitting early: Early resignation rate just 0.86%.
- White pieces bring slightly better luck (46.88% wins) than black (42.10%).
- Persistent fighter with longest winning streak of 15 games and handling losing streaks of up to 19 — ups and downs of a true gladiator.
Recent Battles
On June 5th, 2025, Nodar took down Alexander_Moskalenko with a resignation after a triumph in the Alapin Sicilian Defense. Strategy, endurance, and well-timed tactics won the day. Check out the game here for an intense masterclass in pressure and precision.
Of course, not every day ends with glory. Recent losses to top players like francyIM and Kezin_Roman show that even the best encounter hurdles — but knowing how to bounce back is part of Nodar's charm.
Final Word
Whether blitzing through games or grinding in endurance challenges, NodariousBIG embodies the spirit of a relentless chess warrior — tackling every opening, endgame, and unexpected twist with strategic cunning, fierce determination, and a pinch of cheeky flair. Watch out, opponents — the Lortkipanidze knight is coming to pounce!
What went well in these blitz games
Your blitz play shows sharp opening choices and persistent pressure in the middlegame. You’ve been able to create dynamic positions that force your opponents to decide under time pressure, and you’ve shown good chances to seize the initiative when the position allows it. You also demonstrated stamina by staying in demanding lines and keeping the fight alive through complicated middlegame sequences.
- Active piece coordination in the middlegame, especially using rooks and the queen to press on open files and weak squares.
- Willingness to complicate the position when your opponent is under time pressure, which can tilt the balance in blitz games.
- Resilience in continuing to seek improvements and tactical chances even after the opening phase.
Key improvement areas
- Time management in blitz: Your recent one-month change suggests you’ve had rough patches with clock handling. Develop a simple time plan for each game: allocate a predictable amount of think time for early, non-forcing moves, and reserve critical calculation for the middlegame and endgame when the clock tightens.
- Endgame conversion: Several losses and near-misses came when the game drifted into endgames without a clear plan. Practice practical rook endings and king activity to convert advantages or force draws when needed.
- Tactical calculation under pressure: Blitz rewards quick, accurate calculations. Strengthen this with short, daily tactical puzzles and after each puzzle, note the key idea you missed or mis-evaluated and why.
- Opening plan clarity: You perform well in some aggressive setups, but in blitz it helps to have a concrete, repeatable plan for the first 10–12 moves and a fallback plan if your opponent deviates early. Focus on the typical pawn structures and common middlegame ideas for your main lines (Sicilian Alapin, Scotch, Caro-Kann, etc.).
- Prophylaxis and pattern recognition: Regularly ask, “What is my opponent threatening here, and what could go wrong if I push this plan?” Building this habit reduces overextension and hidden tactical blows against you.
Trends and what they suggest about your play
Your data shows a short-term dip followed by a rebound over longer windows. Specifically, a one-month rating change indicates a drop, while three- and six-month changes point to growth and a rising trend. The slopes suggest that a recent period of stronger results is lifting your longer-term trajectory, but the pace varies by horizon. The overall takeaway is: you have momentum, but you’ll benefit from stabilizing your performance in the next few weeks to prevent bigger swings.
Two-week action plan
- Daily: solve 10–15 tactical puzzles focused on common blitz motifs (checks, forcing sequences, and quick forks or pins).
- Endgame drill: 2 sessions this week on rook endings with pawns, emphasizing king activity and rook activity along open files.
- Opening focus: pick 1–2 openings you feel comfortable with and write a concise 12-move plan for both sides; practice deviations to stay on a clear path in the first 10–12 moves.
- Time management drill: play a few 5+3 or 3+2 practice games and track the first 10 moves; aim to keep early moves efficient and reserve brainpower for critical middlegame decisions.
- Post-game routine: after each blitz game, write down one mistake you made and one concrete idea to avoid repeating it in future games.
Opening performance snapshot
Your openings data show solid results in several lines, including the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation and the Scotch Game, with meaningful win rates. This suggests you’re comfortable pressing from the opening into active middlegames. To leverage this in blitz, continue refining these lines by focusing on typical middlegame plans and common responses from opponents, so you can transition smoothly into a favorable middlegame without getting entangled in side lines.
Strength-adjusted win rate and rating trends
Next steps and support
If you’d like, I can tailor a compact, two-week study plan around your main openings, typical endgames you encounter, and common blitz time-trouble scenarios. Share a couple of your last games you’d like reviewed and we’ll map out specific improvements for the next session.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| MaWrld0 | 1W / 3L / 1D | View |
| 1e41-0 | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Jonas Bjerre | 3W / 6L / 2D | View |
| Seo Jungmin | 19W / 22L / 5D | View |
| Rudik Makarian | 15W / 26L / 7D | View |
| vachess17 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Vladimir Seliverstov | 9W / 21L / 5D | View |
| Karthik Venkataraman | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ixcii | 4W / 4L / 0D | View |
| Haowen Xue | 2W / 6L / 2D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| anon132639 | 90W / 88L / 30D | View Games |
| ZURAB AZMAIPARASHVILI | 37W / 61L / 4D | View Games |
| Giga Quparadze | 21W / 67L / 5D | View Games |
| Safal Bora | 30W / 48L / 7D | View Games |
| Loudian | 30W / 40L / 6D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2930 | 2994 | 2431 | |
| 2024 | 2795 | 2892 | 2429 | 1234 |
| 2023 | 2796 | 2720 | 1068 | |
| 2022 | 2697 | 2811 | 2433 | |
| 2021 | 2731 | 2729 | 2487 | |
| 2020 | 2644 | 2649 | 2487 | |
| 2019 | 2548 | 2655 | ||
| 2018 | 2500 | 2567 | 1295 | |
| 2017 | 2548 | 2462 | 998 | |
| 2016 | 1969 | 2005 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 682W / 599L / 142D | 607W / 688L / 158D | 83.2 |
| 2024 | 351W / 215L / 53D | 293W / 282L / 47D | 80.6 |
| 2023 | 201W / 219L / 38D | 186W / 228L / 41D | 80.8 |
| 2022 | 69W / 79L / 12D | 69W / 77L / 12D | 81.1 |
| 2021 | 424W / 400L / 83D | 358W / 473L / 70D | 79.9 |
| 2020 | 547W / 538L / 105D | 488W / 582L / 122D | 80.3 |
| 2019 | 243W / 241L / 59D | 217W / 274L / 47D | 80.6 |
| 2018 | 197W / 238L / 49D | 203W / 251L / 41D | 78.7 |
| 2017 | 349W / 339L / 52D | 318W / 376L / 44D | 79.4 |
| 2016 | 16W / 1L / 1D | 15W / 4L / 0D | 66.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 315 | 130 | 166 | 19 | 41.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 301 | 159 | 120 | 22 | 52.8% |
| Australian Defense | 277 | 130 | 124 | 23 | 46.9% |
| French Defense | 183 | 95 | 79 | 9 | 51.9% |
| Modern | 157 | 80 | 68 | 9 | 51.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 157 | 77 | 70 | 10 | 49.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 110 | 56 | 46 | 8 | 50.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 107 | 50 | 46 | 11 | 46.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 106 | 54 | 42 | 10 | 50.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 89 | 34 | 51 | 4 | 38.2% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1469 | 677 | 650 | 142 | 46.1% |
| Australian Defense | 913 | 423 | 401 | 89 | 46.3% |
| Scotch Game | 544 | 281 | 219 | 44 | 51.6% |
| French Defense | 450 | 184 | 218 | 48 | 40.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 421 | 210 | 173 | 38 | 49.9% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 316 | 124 | 162 | 30 | 39.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 273 | 93 | 152 | 28 | 34.1% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 273 | 105 | 144 | 24 | 38.5% |
| Czech Defense | 226 | 96 | 105 | 25 | 42.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 219 | 91 | 107 | 21 | 41.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: 3.Nf3 Bg4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 19 | 1 |