Anca-Otilia Baciu
Title: Woman FIDE Master
Meet Anca-Otilia Baciu, known in the chess realm as OtiliaBaciu, a formidable Woman FIDE Master who dances gracefully across the 64 squares with a blend of strategy, grit, and a dash of charm. Anca-Otilia is not your average player; over the years, she has amassed impressive stats that make opponents think twice before challenging her intellect and nerves.
Rating & Style
With a peak rapid rating above 2100 and a blitz max rating nearing 1900, OtiliaBaciu proves she's as versatile as a Swiss Army knife, adapting her playstyle across time controls. Fun fact: her comeback rate (winning even after setbacks) is an astonishing 87%, and if she loses a piece, watch out—she boasts a 100% win rate after such "disasters." It's like watching a superhero recover from losing their cape.
Winning Streaks and Opponents
Her longest winning streak stands at a thrilling 15 games, and currently she’s riding an 8-game win streak, climbing higher on the leaderboard and in fans' hearts alike.
Otilia is a formidable foe, having faced many rivals repeatedly — notably brgbradu and trppa whom she has encountered 9 times each. But her record is spicy; she maintains a solid and witty balance of wins and losses, with a persistent spirit that shines through every match.
Personality on the Board
Known for lasting the long haul, Otilia's games showcase an average of 66 moves per win, proving she’s not afraid to dig deep into the endgame trenches. She’s a careful tactician with a low early resignation rate of just 0.35%, showing she fights tooth and nail until the last pawn moves.
Fun Stats & Quirks
- White pieces bring her slightly more luck with a 55.49% win rate, but even playing Black (usually considered the underdog) she manages a solid 47.5% success rate.
- She’s quite the night owl or early riser: at 6 AM and 5 AM her win rate is a spotless 100%! So chess fans, maybe schedule a match then?
- A tilt factor of 8 suggests she has that human touch: sometimes a little frustration sneaks in, but nothing dampens her fighting spirit.
Summary
In short, Anca-Otilia Baciu is a chess warrior with a keen mind, a spectacular fighting spirit, and the chops to back it all up. Whether blitzing or battling in rapid formats, she’s always ready to surprise with clever tactics and resilient comebacks. Opponents beware: Otilia doesn’t just play chess—she performs it with flair and tenacity!
Hi Anca-Otilia!
Congratulations on climbing above 2000 in rapid – that is no accident. A look at your last few games shows clear strengths but also some patterns you can tighten up. Below is a blend of praise, diagnosis and a concrete action-plan.
Your current profile
- Peak rapid rating: 2135 (2023-10-07) (nice milestone!)
- Typical openings
• With White: 1.e4 aiming for open Sicilians and aggressive ♙f-breaks.
• With Black: Scheveningen-style Sicilians, plus occasional French / Caro-Kann. - Preferred style: Initiative-oriented. You are happy to sacrifice structure for piece activity.
What is already working
- Conversion skill in technical phases.
Your win over Ahmed7ebo shows patient, accurate technique once the queens were off:You kept checks going without blundering a perpetual – a common 2k blitz pitfall. - Tactical vision. In several wins (e.g. 19.f6!! versus jesterprinting) you spotted forcing lines that punished loose enemy kings.
- Clock handling when ahead. In the games you won, the clock never dipped below ~30 s. Once the position was winning you accelerated instead of admiring it.
Where rating points are leaking
- Pawn storms before king safety.
In your loss to Alex-Draifinger you played …h5/…g5 while still behind in development and stuck in the centre. The open g-file ended up helping White. - Alapin & c3-Sicilian structures.
Three recent losses started 1.e4 c5 2.c3/2.Nf3 e6 3.c3. The positions became closed, you lost space on the queenside and had no clear counterplay. - Critical-position time trouble.
The loss on time against Jarda7777 came after you spent 90 s on 18…Nb6 and never recovered. Spending that long is fine if it solves the position; here it only led to a slightly worse endgame. A practical rule: if your next move cannot change the evaluation from =/≠ to ±/∓, cap yourself at 60 s and move on.
Illustrative slip
The turning point in the Alapin game occurred right here:
Black has the bishop pair and pressure, but the queenside is hanging by a thread. The move 22…Na5 walked into Qb4+ and cost a tempi chain. A calmer option was 22…Nxb4 † 23.Qxb4 Qe7 activating the queen while keeping the c-file covered.
Training menu for the next 6 weeks
| Theme | Practical exercise |
|---|---|
| Handling the Alapin | Build a mini-repertoire (10 lines) with …d5/…exd5 setups. Play at least 15 training games vs. bots/friends starting from the position after 2.c3. |
| Prophylaxis before pawn storms | Annotate three of your own losses, writing down “What can my opponent do after my intended move?” before every pawn push. |
| Endgame clock management | Once per session, play a 10 + 0 game and deliberately do not look at the clock until move 20. Train your sense of safe, fast decision making. |
| Pattern-recognition tactics | Daily 15-minute puzzle rush capped at 42 puzzles. After each run, replay the three puzzles you missed and verbalise the motif (fork, skewer, zwischenzug, etc.). |
Mindset reminder
“An attack works when every piece joins in; an early attack fails when they get stuck at home.”
Your attacking instinct is your super-power. Temper it with two extra developing moves and you will feel the elo jump.
Good luck & good skill!
— Your virtual coach
Bonus charts:
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| brgbradu | 6W / 3L / 0D | |
| trppa | 6W / 3L / 0D | |
| greytomcat | 5W / 3L / 0D | |
| jrc-br | 3W / 5L / 0D | |
| oene | 3W / 3L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2026 | |||
| 2024 | 1881 | 2020 | 400 | |
| 2023 | 1841 | 2110 | ||
| 2022 | 1820 | 2014 | ||
| 2021 | 1305 | 1769 | ||
| 2020 | 1873 | |||
| 2019 | 1911 | |||
| 2018 | 1906 | |||
| 2017 | 1921 | |||
| 2016 | 1846 | |||
| 2015 | 1719 | |||
| 2014 | 1737 | |||
| 2013 | 1602 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0W / 0L / 1D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 124.0 |
| 2024 | 34W / 24L / 4D | 21W / 39L / 1D | 73.8 |
| 2023 | 32W / 26L / 5D | 40W / 22L / 3D | 69.6 |
| 2022 | 98W / 62L / 4D | 91W / 66L / 6D | 71.1 |
| 2021 | 91W / 74L / 14D | 76W / 91L / 10D | 72.6 |
| 2020 | 65W / 50L / 9D | 57W / 54L / 13D | 75.5 |
| 2019 | 34W / 25L / 5D | 28W / 31L / 3D | 72.1 |
| 2018 | 79W / 59L / 1D | 56W / 76L / 7D | 71.0 |
| 2017 | 3W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 2L / 1D | 69.5 |
| 2016 | 30W / 13L / 1D | 24W / 15L / 3D | 65.1 |
| 2015 | 57W / 42L / 3D | 45W / 54L / 3D | 68.1 |
| 2014 | 15W / 11L / 1D | 16W / 6L / 1D | 70.5 |
| 2013 | 7W / 4L / 0D | 7W / 3L / 1D | 64.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 35 | 20 | 14 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 24 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 54.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 21 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Döry Defense | 17 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 29.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 16 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 56.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 14 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 35.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 64.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 14 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 14 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 69.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 67 | 37 | 26 | 4 | 55.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 59 | 32 | 23 | 4 | 54.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 58 | 27 | 27 | 4 | 46.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 57 | 34 | 19 | 4 | 59.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 56 | 30 | 26 | 0 | 53.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 56 | 33 | 21 | 2 | 58.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Scheveningen Variation | 53 | 19 | 33 | 1 | 35.9% |
| Czech Defense | 49 | 27 | 22 | 0 | 55.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 46 | 28 | 17 | 1 | 60.9% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 46 | 26 | 20 | 0 | 56.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |