Profile: Alexey Zimin
Alexey Zimin, online known as ozimov13, is a crowned Candidate Master who has carved out a reputation as a sharp, pragmatic tactician in online play. He embraces dynamic positions, fights for initiative, and treats every game as a puzzle to be solved at speed. A naturally curious player, he blends study and instinct to navigate complex middlegames with confidence.
Preferring rapid-paced competitions, Alexey leans into the fast rhythms of online chess, where quick decisions and tenacious pressure can tilt the board in a single sharp combination. For a quick glimpse into his rating journey, see the integrated chart placeholder below:
.Learn more about his profile and journey through the community hub: Alexey Zimin.
Playing style and time controls
Alexey’s play is characterized by relentless pressure, practical calculating, and a willingness to enter lines where he keeps the initiative. He has shown strong results across multiple formats, with a notable proficiency in rapid online play. If there were a mood meter for his games, it would read “calculated aggression” with a dash of fearless improvisation.
Peak moments in rapid and blitz show a player who thrives on speed and precision, while his daily play reveals a broad and well-prepared opening repertoire. His preferred time control appears to be Rapid, aligning with his steady and strategic approach to the game.
Opening repertoire highlights
Alexey has a busy and versatile opening practice, with strong results across a variety of lines. Highlights from his opening performance include:
- Amar Gambit — Daily: 96 games, 75W-9L-12D, Win Rate 78.12%
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation — Daily: 93 games, 71W-11L-11D, Win Rate 76.34%
- Sicilian Defense — Daily: 83 games, 73W-5L-5D, Win Rate 87.95%
- Barnes Defense — Daily: 82 games, 77W-3L-2D, Win Rate 93.9%
- Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit — Daily: 48 games, 45W-1L-2D, Win Rate 93.75%
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation — Daily: 47 games, 41W-3L-3D, Win Rate 87.23%
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation — Daily: 34 games, 25W-3L-6D, Win Rate 73.53%
Additional blitz and rapid openings also populate his repertoire, reflecting a broad and adaptable approach to fight for the initiative in the earliest moves of the game.
Notable achievements and streaks
- Titled player: Candidate Master (FIDE)
- Longest Winning Streak: 97 games
- Peak rating highlights across formats:
- Daily peak: 2375 (2020-12-18)
- Blitz peak: 2427 (2020-07-07)
- Bullet peak: 2480 (2021-03-28)
- Rapid peak: 2165 (2020-03-01)
- Consistent growth across online events from 2017 onward, with a strong showing in daily and blitz formats.
Notes and reminders
Active and constantly learning, Alexey keeps a curious eye on both classical ideas and modern, fast-chess dynamics. He regularly competes online and contributes to the community with a practical, entertaining approach to the game.
What you’re doing well
You show a willingness to experiment with active openings and to press when your opponent makes structural concessions. In several games you transition from the opening into sharp middlegames where your pieces coordinate well and you create practical chances against missteps. You’re also capable of converting small advantages into clean wins when your opponent’s defense breaks down.
- Solid development with a clear plan in many openings you choose, leading to playable middlegames.
- Good tactical awareness in moments when there is an opportunity to seize material or create a direct attack.
- Resilience to keep pressure in dynamic positions and keep fighting until the end of the game.
Key improvement areas
- Opening consistency: you have several strong openings, but a few lines appear to lead to complex positions where you’re less comfortable. Narrow your repertoire to 3–4 reliable lines and study the typical middlegame plans and pawn structures for each.
- Time management: balance is important in rapid games. Practice allocating a fair portion of your time to the critical middlegames and not rushing in the early middlegame. Use a simple rule like “save at least 40% of your time for crucial moves in the middlegame” during practice games.
- Endgame technique: many games head into simplified or endgame scenarios where precise technique matters. Strengthen rook and pawn endgames, as well as common minor-piece endgames, so you can convert more chances you create in the middlegame.
- Decision making under pressure: when the position becomes tactical or uncertain, take a moment to pause, identify candidate plans, and check for forcing moves or immediate threats before committing to a line.
- Pattern recognition and tactic preparation: continue building a routine of 15–20 minutes of daily tactics to sharpen short-term calculation and recognition of common motifs you’ve faced in your openings.
Opening repertoire observations
Your performance across several openings is strong, especially in lines that lead to solid endgames (for example, the Ruy Lopez Exchange, QGD Tarrasch, and certain Caro-Kann setups). You also have some sharp experiences in double-edged Sicilian lines. Suggested approach:
- Keep 2–3 “easy-to-play” openings that you understand deeply, including key typical plans, break ideas, and common endgames.
- For the more dynamic Sicilian lines, pair them with a simple defensive checklist and a handful of safe retreats or simplifications to avoid getting into untenable tactical melees when you’re low on time.
- When facing ambitious opponents in sharp openings, practice concrete middlegame plans and common tactical motifs you’re likely to encounter so you can react confidently rather than reactively.
Practical training plan (next 2 weeks)
- Focus 3–4 openings: define a short, repeatable plan for the middlegame after each, and memorize at least 2 standard pawn structures or typical break ideas for each.
- Daily tactics: 15–20 minutes of short puzzles to improve calculation speed and pattern recognition.
- Endgame practice: study one rook ending and one basic pawn ending per week, with practical exercises or annotated examples.
- Game review habit: after each rapid game, spend 5–10 minutes identifying the key turning points, especially where a small inaccuracy or misjudgment led to a worse position.
- Play with a clock discipline: set a target to complete critical middlegame plans in a reasonable time, avoiding large time deficits in the late middlegame.
Micro-goals to implement
- Choose one solid opening line to rely on in rapid games and master the typical middlegame ideas that follow.
- Create a short post-game checklist: assess opening consistency, key candidate moves you considered, and the endgame plan you had in mind.
- Improve king safety awareness by checking immediate threats to your king within two moves after every major change in the position.
Would you like a tailored practice schedule?
If you want, I can generate a week-by-week practice plan focused on your openings, endgames, and tactic work, aligned to your target events and available training time.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| abdvjdjjkkdnvkm | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| kaushal2309 | 283W / 1L / 0D | |
| gc147069765 | 121W / 8L / 2D | |
| morolesik | 48W / 2L / 3D | |
| ceshveyboy | 36W / 0L / 0D | |
| abuhzzaaalbadi | 24W / 0L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2422 | 2272 | ||
| 2024 | 2278 | |||
| 2023 | 2313 | |||
| 2022 | 2247 | |||
| 2021 | 2480 | 2422 | 2289 | |
| 2020 | 2392 | 2352 | 2137 | 2365 |
| 2019 | 2102 | 2323 | 2301 | |
| 2018 | 2183 | 2198 | 2301 | |
| 2017 | 2151 | 2213 | 1894 | 1938 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26W / 3L / 0D | 30W / 2L / 2D | 52.8 |
| 2024 | 96W / 5L / 1D | 142W / 10L / 4D | 52.0 |
| 2023 | 137W / 4L / 4D | 131W / 5L / 4D | 57.7 |
| 2022 | 17W / 9L / 8D | 23W / 9L / 8D | 61.4 |
| 2021 | 58W / 10L / 12D | 56W / 14L / 15D | 65.1 |
| 2020 | 121W / 22L / 26D | 114W / 28L / 34D | 61.5 |
| 2019 | 134W / 23L / 38D | 118W / 28L / 45D | 60.3 |
| 2018 | 187W / 48L / 30D | 166W / 58L / 41D | 61.1 |
| 2017 | 212W / 60L / 16D | 205W / 60L / 29D | 63.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 96 | 75 | 9 | 12 | 78.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 93 | 71 | 11 | 11 | 76.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 83 | 73 | 5 | 5 | 88.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 82 | 77 | 3 | 2 | 93.9% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 51 | 39 | 5 | 7 | 76.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 49 | 34 | 7 | 8 | 69.4% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 48 | 45 | 1 | 2 | 93.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 47 | 41 | 3 | 3 | 87.2% |
| Bird Opening | 39 | 29 | 5 | 5 | 74.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 34 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 73.5% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 22 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 16 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 56.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 13 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 30.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 11 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 27.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| QGD Tarrasch: 7.Bg2 Be7 8.O-O | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Modern | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| QGD Tarrasch: 7.Bg2 Be7 8.O-O | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD Tarrasch: 4.cxd5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Scheveningen Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 97 | 4 |
| Losing | 5 | 0 |