International Master Adam Popovics (padam19)
Adam Popovics, known in the chess world by the enigmatic username padam19, is an International Master bestowed this prestigious title by FIDE. A devoted gladiator of the 64 squares, Adam's journey through the ranks is a testament to perseverance, strategic brilliance, and that occasional knightly mischief.
Starting from humble beginnings with a Bullet rating just over 1300 in 2012, Adam quickly fireproofed his skills, peaking at a dazzling 2784 in 2024 — which is basically grandmaster territory and beyond the average mortal’s dreams. In Blitz chess, the battlefield where seconds count and nerves fray, his rating soared to an impressive 2875 in mid-2025. Daily and Rapid chess? Let's just say Adam takes every format seriously, rocking ratings up to 1955 and 2173 respectively.
Games-wise, Adam has played tens of thousands of battles online, racking up an awe-inspiring 8696 wins in Bullet and 16,944 wins in Blitz. His endurance is legendary; he once won an incredible 44 games in a row - that's basically a chess marathon crowned by checkmate! Of course, the dark side looms as well with a longest losing streak of 21, reminding us even legends stumble (or maybe just occasionally tilted at 23:00, his proclaimed best time of day to play).
Adam’s style? A blend of patience and aggression. He averages about 71 moves per win and isn’t shy of lengthy endgames, navigating complex endgame positions 72% of the time. He’s also got a knack for comebacks with a comeback rate of nearly 84% – those losses after dropping a piece? Not a given here with nearly half turning around into wins.
Signature Openings
- Bullet: Prefers "Top Secret" openings (67.7% win rate), but also ventures into unknown territory (56.8% win rate).
- Blitz: Fond of the Queens Pawn Opening Horwitz Defense, boasting a solid 60% win ratio, and an adventurous spirit trying the Indian Game and Trompowsky Attack with mixed but competitive results.
Recent Endeavors
Adam’s latest recorded victory was fresh as of June 2025 on Chess.com, where he triumphed in a well-fought game against Nankainna using the elegant Reti Opening’s King's Indian Attack Spassky Variation. His strategy coaxed a resignation after a battle of wit and time management, winning on time and tactics alike.
The recent losses didn’t break his stride; battles against formidable opponents like CollapsarLord and AlexanderKing sharpen his resolve. Even in defeat, Adam shows the heart of a champion, resigning only when checkmate is clearly imminent or the clock inevitably runs out.
Off the Board
Between sessions of tactical wizardry and calculated gambits, Adam is known to have a tilt factor of 21 – which means even the strongest have their "uh-oh" moments, but his resilience fuels comebacks and epic wins soon after.
Whether you're a fan of lightning-fast Bullet or the intense plays of Blitz, Adam's profile is a thrilling saga of ambition, brilliant triumphs, and the nuanced drama that makes chess the ultimate mind sport — served with a dash of humor and unwavering passion!
Keep an eye on padam19, he’s a master both in title and temperament, ready to checkmate you when you least expect it!
Positive Highlights
Adam, your recent blitz games show several strengths that you can build upon:
- Strong Opening Preparation: Your use of openings like the Trompowsky Attack and the Sicilian Defense reflects solid theoretical knowledge and confidence in varied structures.
- Aggressive Playstyle: You effectively take the initiative early, frequently pushing for central control and launching attacks on the opponent’s king as seen with quick pawn advances and piece activity.
- Strong Tactical Awareness: In your wins, you capitalize on opponent inaccuracies quickly, converting small advantages like piece activity and better pawn structure into decisive outcomes.
- Resilience in Complex Positions: You show good understanding of dynamic positions, choosing active moves even in complications, which is a great strength in fast-paced blitz games.
Areas for Improvement
To raise your blitz performance further, consider focusing on these areas:
- Time Management: Some losses occurred due to time pressure or losses on time, so improving your speed and clock awareness during critical moments will be beneficial.
- Defensive Technique: In the losses, there were moments where defending key squares or simplifying the position could have helped steer the game towards draws or even counterattacks.
- Opening Diversity: While your current openings are strong, mixing in more surprise lines or less common replies might throw opponents off their preparation in fast games.
- Handling Endgames Under Time Pressure: Some endgames slipped away; sharpening your endgame fundamentals and practical technique in limited time will improve your conversion rate.
Performance and Trend Insights
Your overall performance statistics highlight your competitive level and current form:
- Win/Loss/Draw Record: Close to an even balance in wins and losses, showing that you consistently challenge opponents but there is room to convert more games to wins.
- Strength Adjusted Win Rate: Nearly 50%, a solid benchmark indicating competitive play against opponents of similar strength.
- Recent Rating Trend: Your rating has increased by 19 points in the last month, though the last 3 and 6 months show mixed results. Positive slopes in the short-term hint at effective recent play and learning.
- Opening Success Rate: Win rates around 43-49% in your common openings suggest good preparation but some openings might benefit from deeper exploration or practice to boost consistency.
Recommendations for Improvement
Here are some practical steps to help improve your blitz results:
- Practice Fast Endgames: Use training tools or timed drills to improve accuracy and confidence when time is low.
- Analyze Recent Losses: Review games where you lost on time or failed to defend better and identify recurring tactical or strategic mistakes.
- Expand Opening Repertoire: Try including some less-explored lines within your favored openings to gain surprise value in blitz games.
- Utilize Speed Drills: Train with shorter time controls to improve intuition and move speed without sacrificing accuracy.
- Physical and Mental Preparation: Blitz chess demands sharp focus; make sure you are well-rested and focused before sessions for peak performance.
Next Steps
Keep leveraging your strong opening knowledge while sharpening your practical play under time pressure. Integrate the analysis of your recent games and monitor your rating trends for signs of progress.
Remember, continuous learning and practice are key to maintaining and improving your competitive edge in blitz chess. Good luck with your upcoming games!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 85W / 153L / 3D | View Games |
| PracticeMakesOK | 78W / 96L / 19D | View Games |
| Alexey Jarovinsky | 53W / 74L / 10D | View Games |
| Tamaz Mgeladze | 53W / 59L / 9D | View Games |
| ANIMAL45 | 63W / 54L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2919 | |||
| 2024 | 2784 | 2735 | ||
| 2023 | 2526 | 2563 | ||
| 2022 | 2640 | 2678 | 2084 | |
| 2021 | 2438 | 2632 | ||
| 2020 | 2536 | 2548 | ||
| 2019 | 2555 | 2644 | ||
| 2018 | 2566 | 2518 | 1908 | |
| 2017 | 2527 | 2432 | 1931 | |
| 2016 | 2507 | 2486 | 1816 | |
| 2015 | 2352 | 2237 | 1741 | |
| 2014 | 2302 | 2238 | 1842 | |
| 2013 | 2321 | 2250 | 1599 | |
| 2012 | 2288 | 2246 | 1415 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 659W / 755L / 107D | 583W / 839L / 96D | 70.1 |
| 2024 | 1028W / 1140L / 132D | 923W / 1261L / 114D | 69.8 |
| 2023 | 1287W / 1486L / 201D | 1206W / 1609L / 164D | 71.1 |
| 2022 | 952W / 1013L / 144D | 901W / 1072L / 132D | 73.4 |
| 2021 | 385W / 430L / 62D | 408W / 433L / 40D | 71.1 |
| 2020 | 1093W / 1055L / 158D | 914W / 1230L / 146D | 70.9 |
| 2019 | 916W / 830L / 129D | 862W / 921L / 94D | 72.6 |
| 2018 | 2450W / 1559L / 197D | 2164W / 1808L / 231D | 70.2 |
| 2017 | 1469W / 882L / 124D | 1386W / 988L / 98D | 69.5 |
| 2016 | 1998W / 822L / 113D | 1825W / 994L / 105D | 69.7 |
| 2015 | 179W / 59L / 11D | 177W / 62L / 7D | 65.8 |
| 2014 | 456W / 133L / 11D | 425W / 161L / 14D | 63.9 |
| 2013 | 600W / 301L / 39D | 557W / 350L / 32D | 69.8 |
| 2012 | 82W / 36L / 9D | 70W / 43L / 7D | 75.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 1186 | 693 | 457 | 36 | 58.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 959 | 532 | 386 | 41 | 55.5% |
| French Defense | 665 | 393 | 249 | 23 | 59.1% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 607 | 345 | 237 | 25 | 56.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 499 | 288 | 193 | 18 | 57.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 484 | 285 | 189 | 10 | 58.9% |
| Alekhine Defense | 460 | 249 | 197 | 14 | 54.1% |
| Modern | 427 | 232 | 176 | 19 | 54.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 361 | 219 | 130 | 12 | 60.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 354 | 170 | 164 | 20 | 48.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3278 | 1478 | 1588 | 212 | 45.1% |
| Australian Defense | 2615 | 1266 | 1204 | 145 | 48.4% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 2173 | 991 | 1038 | 144 | 45.6% |
| French Defense | 1685 | 830 | 748 | 107 | 49.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 1463 | 633 | 739 | 91 | 43.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1067 | 451 | 560 | 56 | 42.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 871 | 403 | 412 | 56 | 46.3% |
| Döry Defense | 830 | 387 | 392 | 51 | 46.6% |
| Modern | 776 | 361 | 365 | 50 | 46.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 746 | 343 | 358 | 45 | 46.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Semi-Tarrasch, 5.e3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 44 | 3 |
| Losing | 21 | 0 |