Papapizza is a passionate chess enthusiast who has been steadily climbing the rating charts since 2019. After beginning in Bullet at just over 1000, this focused competitor soared to a peak Bullet rating of 2802 in both 2022 and 2023—showing remarkable growth and consistency over the years. Their Blitz prowess also follows a similar upward trend, with top ratings cresting above 2700.
Known for a preference toward dynamic, attacking lines, Papapizza often employs the Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack and Reti Opening setups, among others. These aggressive choices, coupled with a flexible approach, helped build a strong White win rate at 59% and a Black win rate of nearly 58%. Their style produces decisive outcomes: they favor swift resolutions, highlighted by a relatively high early resignation rate, but also demonstrate resilience when behind—staging comebacks over a quarter of the time after suffering material deficits.
Highly active in multiple time controls, Papapizza engages comfortably in Rapid, Daily, and Blitz, but truly shines in Bullet, where they scored a personal-best streak of 55 consecutive wins. Tactically alert, they average around 22 moves per victory—showcasing a brisk, direct approach to finishing off opponents.
Today, Papapizza continues to hone their craft, with continued dedication to sharp openings and fast tactical fights. Whether in short, explosive Bullet bouts or more measured Rapid showdowns, their creative and fearless playing style—along with an already impressive record—keeps them a competitive and memorable presence on the chessboard.
Overall Performance Summary
Ben, you have shown impressive progress in your blitz games with a solid rating increase of 240 in the last month alone. Your strength-adjusted win rate is just above 50%, indicating consistent play against opponents of similar skill. This recent spike in rating (slope over 3 months is very positive) highlights your current upward trajectory in playing strength.
While your 6- and 12-month trends show some decline, your recent results reflect that you are rapidly improving again, so keep building on your momentum.
Positive Highlights from Recent Games
- Opening Choices: You handle complex openings like the Semi-Slav Defense and Queens Gambit Declined confidently, keeping good pressure on your opponents and maintaining solid development.
- Active Play: In wins, you often apply pressure by using tactical motifs like pawn breaks and piece activity around the center and kingside, resulting in initiative and sometimes winning material.
- Endgame Technique: Your ability to convert endgame advantages is improving, as shown in games with favorable pawn structures and piece coordination leading to resignations or time wins from opponents.
- Time Management: Managing to win games even on the clock in faster time controls shows growing comfort with rapid decision-making.
Areas to Focus on for Improvement
- Handling Pressure in Key Moments: Review moments in losses where positions became critical (e.g., under attack or defending difficult endgames). Working on calm calculation and defense under pressure can help prevent those losses.
- Tactical Accuracy: Though your opening knowledge is strong, continuing to sharpen tactical vision through puzzles and analysis of your games can reduce small mistakes or inaccuracies that sometimes shift the balance.
- Positional Understanding: Deepen your understanding of pawn structures and optimal piece placement, especially in transitions from opening to middlegame, to maintain or increase pressure effectively.
- Endgame Awareness: There were games where opponent resources like passed pawns or piece activity caused difficulties. Studying fundamental endgame principles (king activity, opposition, and pawn races) will strengthen your closing ability.
Suggested Next Steps
- Continue analyzing your recent wins and losses in detail, especially moments where you gained or lost clear advantage.
- Practice common themes in your favored openings, such as the Semi-Slav and Queens Gambit Declined, to increase familiarity with typical plans.
- Set aside time for tactical training daily to boost calculation speed and accuracy.
- Review critical endgames from your practice or games—particularly those involving pawns and rooks—to reinforce technique.
- Keep playing blitz but consider mixing in rapid games for deeper calculation practice.
Encouragement
Your current progress is very promising, Ben. The positive trends in your rating and performance suggest your hard work is paying off. Stay focused on improvement, and keep enjoying the blend of strategic depth and fast decision-making that blitz chess offers. Great work so far — keep pushing forward!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Manu Prasad | 2W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Lars Oskar Hauge | 13W / 28L / 1D | View |
| watchandlearnlol | 3W / 3L / 0D | View |
| 111michael | 61W / 67L / 3D | View |
| bugtsirorret | 3W / 6L / 0D | View |
| deathincoolingmoonlight | 19W / 9L / 0D | View |
| egosmasherr | 40W / 64L / 1D | View |
| Jurica Srbis | 5W / 7L / 0D | View |
| Brandon Wang | 15W / 3L / 0D | View |
| pknm | 20W / 15L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| nochewycandy | 221W / 450L / 12D | View Games |
| Epiphany Peters | 130W / 89L / 1D | View Games |
| Mark Plotkin | 72W / 125L / 1D | View Games |
| Cindy Qiao | 114W / 77L / 2D | View Games |
| avatarthelastsacsitter | 88W / 98L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2394 | 2317 | 2433 | 1920 |
| 2024 | 2683 | 2250 | 2433 | 1898 |
| 2023 | 2392 | 2365 | 2433 | 1851 |
| 2022 | 2802 | 2015 | 2433 | 1900 |
| 2021 | 2689 | 2728 | 2461 | 1965 |
| 2020 | 2447 | 2369 | 2577 | 1415 |
| 2019 | 2006 | 1617 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 634W / 418L / 18D | 722W / 448L / 17D | 6.0 |
| 2024 | 329W / 91L / 10D | 308W / 108L / 16D | 32.3 |
| 2023 | 1269W / 825L / 29D | 1290W / 828L / 29D | 15.1 |
| 2022 | 1653W / 1051L / 69D | 1642W / 1149L / 63D | 22.9 |
| 2021 | 475W / 253L / 55D | 444W / 269L / 59D | 79.1 |
| 2020 | 86W / 18L / 6D | 89W / 23L / 1D | 74.0 |
| 2019 | 30W / 1L / 1D | 24W / 6L / 1D | 55.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7746 | 4659 | 3043 | 44 | 60.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 128 | 98 | 20 | 10 | 76.6% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 107 | 64 | 31 | 12 | 59.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 104 | 86 | 16 | 2 | 82.7% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 96 | 66 | 22 | 8 | 68.8% |
| Australian Defense | 85 | 64 | 15 | 6 | 75.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 81 | 52 | 27 | 2 | 64.2% |
| Petrov's Defense | 79 | 46 | 28 | 5 | 58.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 77 | 65 | 8 | 4 | 84.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 74 | 56 | 15 | 3 | 75.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benko Gambit | 43 | 33 | 8 | 2 | 76.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 20.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2269 | 1093 | 1168 | 8 | 48.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 238 | 189 | 42 | 7 | 79.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 145 | 83 | 54 | 8 | 57.2% |
| Australian Defense | 106 | 64 | 35 | 7 | 60.4% |
| Modern | 57 | 42 | 11 | 4 | 73.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 56 | 35 | 18 | 3 | 62.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 52 | 29 | 18 | 5 | 55.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 48 | 24 | 21 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 40 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 39 | 30 | 7 | 2 | 76.9% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 55 | 2 |
| Losing | 33 | 0 |