Petar Djuric: The FIDE Master with a Bullet Passion
Petar Djuric, known online as petarSdjuric, is a proudly titled FIDE Master who has been lighting up chessboards since at least 2013. With a remarkable knack for speed, Petar's forte is undoubtedly bullet chess, where reflexes meet razor-sharp tactics.
Chess Career & Style
Petar is not your average weekend player. Over the years, they have amassed an astonishing 13,124 wins in bullet chess alone, proving that lightning-fast calculations run in their veins. Sporting a peak bullet rating of 2413 as of May 2025, Petar dances around opponents with elegant openings such as the Sicilian Defense and the aggressive Scandinavian Defense, showcasing a win rate over 60% in some variations.
Performance Highlights
- Their bullet chess games often thrill spectators, with an explosive average of 71 moves per win and a tactical resilience boasting an 86% comeback rate after setbacks.
- Petar's winning streaks hit impressive highs (up to 17 wins in a row!), only counterbalanced by learning experiences from occasional tilted moments (with a tilt factor of 15, because hey, even maestros are human).
- Their blitz peak soared to a dazzling 2340 rating in November 2020, and rapid and daily formats have been steadily tackled too, showing Petar's versatility across time controls.
Game Highlights
One of Petar's recent shining moments was a perfectly timed victory on May 28, 2025, over the opponent CompactSpinach, where they skillfully maneuvered through the Sicilian Defense, forcing a win on time with nerves of steel.
A Humble Chess Philosopher
While Petar conquers chessboards worldwide, they're also a reminder that behind every rating is a story – full of brilliant sacrifices, nail-biting time scrambles, and maybe a coffee or three spilled over the board. Whether dazzling in bullet or plotting in classic time controls, petarSdjuric continues to chase the thrill of the game. Just watch out for those 30-second surprises – blink and you’ll miss a brilliant checkmate!
May the rooks be with you, Petar!
Overview of your recent bullet games
You showed willingness to fight for initiative and you aren’t afraid to enter sharp, tactical lines. In your win you capitalized on active piece play and created concrete threats. In the loss and draw, some risky decisions and momentary miscalculations gave your opponent chances to seize the initiative. The key going forward is to balance courage with solid, practical decisions that keep you safe when the clock is ticking.
What you did well
- Creative and aggressive play: you pursued forcing lines and kept the pressure on your opponent, which helps you convert small advantages quickly in bullet."
- Active piece coordination in open positions: you made the most of open lines and piece activity to generate threats and play for the win.
- Resilience in tight time controls: you often found dynamic ideas even when you’re pressed for time, staying in the fight and looking for tactical chances.
Important areas to improve
- Solidify a compact opening repertoire: pick two to three openings for white and two for black, with clear middlegame plans. This reduces decision fatigue in bullet games and helps you reach familiar structures where you can play confidently.
- Improve king safety and prophylaxis in sharp lines: in the heat of the moment, consider safe development orders and simple defensive moves to guard against back-rank threats and queen invasions. If a line looks highly tactical, it’s often wise to simplify to avoid getting overwhelmed.
- Endgame technique under time pressure: practice converting small advantages into a win in rook-and-pawn endings and simple King–pawn endgames. If you reach a simplified endgame, have a plan to push a passed pawn or activate the king early.
- Time management and move selection: develop a quick pre-scan for forcing moves, material imbalances, and immediate threats before committing to a long line. If no clear plan emerges, switch to a solid, safe continuation rather than chasing a complicated tactic.
Concrete, actionable training plan
- Week 1 — Tactics focus (15–20 minutes daily): study common tactical motifs (forks, pins, skewers, overloads) and practice spotting them in 5–7 minute drills. Follow with 5 bullet games applying at least one tactical idea per game.
- Week 2 — Opening consolidation (15 minutes daily): choose two White openings and two Black defenses to specialize in. Learn the main lines and the typical middlegame plans that follow. Play practice games to reinforce the structures.
- Week 3 — Endgame fundamentals (20–30 minutes, twice this week): review rook endings, basic king and pawn endings, and simple technique for converting a small edge. Do short drills followed by one bullet game focusing on ending the game cleanly.
- Ongoing — Post-game review: after each session, identify one concrete mistake and write a brief plan to address it in the next game.
Reflection prompts to guide improvement
- What was the most common type of mistake in the last three games, and how can you prevent it?
- Which opening idea from your repertoire caused you the most trouble, and what safe alternative could you use in the future?
- Which tactical motif do you want to recognize more quickly, and what quick drill can you add to your practice to strengthen it?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| druninnova | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nil424 | 9W / 0L / 0D | View |
| bullmod | 3W / 3L / 2D | View |
| cscs1966 | 6W / 4L / 0D | View |
| batmanpg | 2W / 1L / 2D | View |
| dkkoulin68 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| dsjz24 | 2W / 1L / 1D | View |
| tzcara_viendi | 4W / 1L / 0D | View |
| thecrazycapivara | 13W / 11L / 2D | View |
| ur_really_good | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Liew | 80W / 114L / 11D | View Games |
| jonjonantaran | 49W / 69L / 13D | View Games |
| crasmus | 25W / 71L / 2D | View Games |
| uwontlastlong | 54W / 28L / 1D | View Games |
| DrGruenfeld | 41W / 35L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2361 | 2332 | 1371 | |
| 2024 | 2233 | 2251 | ||
| 2023 | 2214 | 1646 | ||
| 2022 | 2234 | 2245 | ||
| 2021 | 2252 | 2245 | ||
| 2020 | 2189 | 2300 | 1768 | |
| 2019 | 2103 | |||
| 2018 | 2052 | 2132 | ||
| 2017 | 2067 | |||
| 2016 | 2081 | |||
| 2015 | 2069 | 2027 | 1854 | |
| 2014 | 2032 | 1986 | 1214 | |
| 2013 | 1965 | 2001 | 936 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1757W / 1495L / 173D | 1692W / 1496L / 225D | 77.9 |
| 2024 | 828W / 700L / 106D | 853W / 681L / 99D | 77.7 |
| 2023 | 1359W / 1087L / 146D | 1265W / 1169L / 159D | 77.9 |
| 2022 | 467W / 352L / 53D | 407W / 411L / 62D | 75.7 |
| 2021 | 874W / 757L / 97D | 791W / 810L / 117D | 79.1 |
| 2020 | 1133W / 1057L / 128D | 1049W / 1127L / 154D | 77.6 |
| 2019 | 4W / 0L / 1D | 2W / 5L / 0D | 96.6 |
| 2018 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 2L / 0D | 67.7 |
| 2017 | 30W / 33L / 3D | 29W / 32L / 1D | 75.3 |
| 2016 | 9W / 7L / 2D | 7W / 8L / 0D | 69.0 |
| 2015 | 523W / 445L / 48D | 458W / 525L / 51D | 74.5 |
| 2014 | 501W / 515L / 41D | 507W / 503L / 51D | 79.2 |
| 2013 | 483W / 340L / 37D | 473W / 347L / 39D | 76.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1826 | 918 | 772 | 136 | 50.3% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 1823 | 901 | 781 | 141 | 49.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1652 | 847 | 713 | 92 | 51.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1639 | 832 | 714 | 93 | 50.8% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1395 | 749 | 589 | 57 | 53.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1329 | 630 | 614 | 85 | 47.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 1154 | 539 | 544 | 71 | 46.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1128 | 580 | 482 | 66 | 51.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1037 | 510 | 464 | 63 | 49.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 993 | 492 | 427 | 74 | 49.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 48 | 28 | 19 | 1 | 58.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 35 | 18 | 10 | 7 | 51.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 28 | 10 | 14 | 4 | 35.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 21 | 8 | 13 | 0 | 38.1% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 21 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 21 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 19 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 47.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 17 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 41.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 17 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 64.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 78.6% |
| Petrov's Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Scheveningen Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 10 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |