Philofive: A Chess Prodigy's Journey
Philofive has carved out a reputation as a dynamic and resilient chess competitor who has continuously pushed the boundaries of tactical creativity and strategic depth. Known for his impressive performances in blitz and bullet formats, he has battled through thousands of games over the years, consistently raising his standards and adapting his style to overcome challenges. His blitz ratings have steadily evolved over time – from the competitive 2196 level in 2013 to peaks well into the mid-2300s – reflecting his persistent desire to improve and excel.
Renowned for an aggressive yet balanced approach, Philofive is equally comfortable in the rapid-fire tempo of bullet chess, where his explosive tactical awareness is paired with an uncanny ability to bounce back even from adverse positions. His record shows near-perfect comeback rates, and even in moments of temporary disadvantage, he manages to find opportunities to steer the game back in his favor.
His playing style is marked by a high endgame frequency and methodical approach – a testament to his deep understanding of the nuances of chess strategy. With an average game length that hovers around 80 moves for both wins and losses, he revels in the complexity of prolonged battles while maintaining a clear, decisive focus on long-term planning. Notably, his win rate as White often surpasses that with Black, hinting at the meticulous preparation and confidence he brings to every game.
Beyond the raw numbers and ratings, Philofive’s career is also defined by his keen psychological insight at the board. With an impressively low early resignation rate and a tilt factor that suggests calm determination, he has developed a robust mental framework. This mental fortitude, combined with strong performance trends seen across different times of day and days of the week, underscores his all-around consistency.
In summary, Philofive’s chess biography is one of relentless work, tactical ingenuity, and a profound understanding of the game’s intricate layers. Whether in blitz battles or bullet skirmishes, his career embodies the spirit of a modern chess champion – ever learning, ever evolving, and always striving for excellence.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2011KING | 141W / 90L / 9D | |
| drjurex | 97W / 41L / 10D | |
| ermir daka | 88W / 38L / 13D | |
| lezqav | 64W / 56L / 7D | |
| Mark Kotliar | 64W / 47L / 16D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2331 | |||
| 2018 | 2260 | 2166 | ||
| 2017 | 2339 | 2353 | ||
| 2016 | 2271 | 2360 | ||
| 2015 | 2406 | 2192 | 2121 | |
| 2014 | 2233 | 2271 | 2209 | |
| 2013 | 2242 | 2196 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 11W / 8L / 1D | 14W / 7L / 2D | 82.4 |
| 2018 | 198W / 118L / 26D | 156W / 146L / 41D | 80.2 |
| 2017 | 1002W / 637L / 155D | 901W / 733L / 198D | 79.7 |
| 2016 | 422W / 241L / 66D | 397W / 266L / 83D | 80.5 |
| 2015 | 1178W / 524L / 151D | 1190W / 527L / 152D | 80.8 |
| 2014 | 2886W / 1116L / 332D | 2676W / 1277L / 391D | 81.3 |
| 2013 | 1269W / 564L / 131D | 1258W / 561L / 144D | 82.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3563 | 2088 | 1174 | 301 | 58.6% |
| French Defense | 907 | 522 | 277 | 108 | 57.5% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 773 | 442 | 253 | 78 | 57.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 595 | 340 | 214 | 41 | 57.1% |
| Australian Defense | 521 | 315 | 158 | 48 | 60.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 512 | 290 | 143 | 79 | 56.6% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 489 | 303 | 150 | 36 | 62.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation | 359 | 211 | 116 | 32 | 58.8% |
| Modern Defense | 350 | 212 | 106 | 32 | 60.6% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 333 | 226 | 72 | 35 | 67.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 517 | 362 | 131 | 24 | 70.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 503 | 335 | 148 | 20 | 66.6% |
| French Defense | 385 | 247 | 112 | 26 | 64.2% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 260 | 184 | 53 | 23 | 70.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 253 | 189 | 56 | 8 | 74.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 195 | 142 | 50 | 3 | 72.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 190 | 126 | 58 | 6 | 66.3% |
| Modern Defense | 179 | 119 | 49 | 11 | 66.5% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 128 | 84 | 40 | 4 | 65.6% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 127 | 85 | 37 | 5 | 66.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 6.Nf3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 1 |