Profile Summary: Phillip (a.k.a. philosophical2)
Once upon a chessboard, in the digital realm of Chess.com, there lives a tenacious and slightly unpredictable player known as Phillip, or by his virtual alter ego philosophical2. A gladiator of pawns and knights, Phillip has been waging tactical battles since 2009, steadily climbing the ranks with a persistent spirit and a hint of cheeky resignation.
Phillip’s journey is a saga of resilience and moments of brilliance. With a peak daily rating of 2081 achieved in early 2022 and an impressive blitz peak at 1962 just this year, he’s no stranger to outmaneuvering his opponents. His bullet play also boasts a peak rating near 1890, proving that he’s as quick on the draw as he is thoughtful on the board.
A reliable friend to the Unknown Opening, philosophical2 engages in over 66,000 games under this mysterious strategy, boasting a win rate above 53% in blitz. He also holds favor with the Top Secret opening (which, by the name, sounds like it should come with a confidential clearance), where he maintains a sturdy 56% win rate. It's clear that Phillip prefers to keep some cards (and moves) close to his chest!
When it comes to daily chess, Phillip is nearly unstoppable, winning over 96% of his games with the Unknown Opening. Whether that’s luck, skill, or just sheer determination (and maybe a bit of time to think), his opponents tremble at the sight of his daily performances.
Known for an early resignation rate of 55.16%, some suspect that Phillip isn’t shy about admitting defeat — a humility seldom seen in chess players. But do not be fooled! His comeback rate is a solid 35.52%, meaning when the chips are down and the queens fall, he still scrambles back in true warrior style.
Notably, Phillip's best games unfold when the calendar strikes 9 PM, turning night into his strategic playground. So if you're ever facing him at that magical hour, brace yourself for a brainy battle that may last well into the night!
Psychological Profile
- Tilts less than most - his tilt factor is a modest 26, so his moves reflect thought over frustration.
- White pieces as a mild advantage with a 53.42% win rate, because who doesn't like to start first?
- Black pieces hold their own too, at 52.37%, warning all: his defenses are no pushovers.
Playing Style & Stats
This chessknight averages around 33 moves per win and 31 moves per loss, proving he's in it for the thrilling marathon, not just quick sprints. His penchant for endings shows up in a 35.39% endgame frequency, indicating he likes to dance the strategic dance right till the finish.
Funny Tidbits
Phillip’s nickname could as well be “The Secret Gambit” given his Top Secret openings and significant Unknown Opening repertoire. Combined with a 55% rate of early resignation, it’s clear he’s not above a cheeky surrender if things start to look grim — but don't let that fool you; he’s often plotting a stealthy comeback just when you think you’ve got him.
Chess.com opponents beware: this slide in ratings is often followed by an impressive rebound - making Phillip a bit like a phoenix who sometimes just needs a coffee break.
Most Recent Notable Victory: A Checkmate to Remember
In a recent in-depth duel with Klo837, Phillip executed a masterful strategy in the Queens Pawn Opening Zukertort Variation, culminating in a beautiful checkmate. His careful maneuvering of pawns and queens left his opponent’s king utterly cornered on move 24. Not just a tactician, but an artist of checkmate!
Summary
Phillip’s chess story is one of evolution, strategy, and a good dose of humility. He plays with passion, occasionally throws in some early resignations — maybe even to keep things spicy — but always brings determination and a fair bit of tactical chess wisdom. Whether you’re a newbie or a grandmaster, facing philosophical2 means engaging with a player who respects the glory and the grind of chess.
Recent bullet play: what’s going well
Great to see you keeping momentum in fast games. Your trend lines suggest you are applying lessons consistently and staying sharp under time pressure. You’re able to start with solid, principled moves and keep pressure in tactical or complex positions when the opportunity arises.
- You’re showing a positive trajectory over multiple time frames, which usually means you’re learning from mistakes and applying them in practice.
- Your choice of openings often leads to tactical, double-edged positions where you can out-calculate your opponents. This suits a bullet pace where quick, forcing ideas win the day.
- When you seize initiative, you convert chances into wins more reliably, which is a key strength in short time controls.
Where you can improve
- Time management and decision speed: in bullet, even small delays or second-guessing can swing the result. Practice a simple two-move thought process before making each move to reduce over-thinking.
- Endgame and simplification: many bullet games end in quick endgames. Sharpen king-and-pawn endings and rook endings so you can convert small advantages more cleanly.
- Opening reliability: you have strong results with some openings and weaker results with others. Focus on two main lines that you’re comfortable with and prepare solid replies to common responses.
- Blunder avoidance: the pace in bullet makes occasional blunders likely. Build a quick pre-mmove checklist (check for immediate threats, ensure king safety, and compare major piece activity) to catch obvious misses.
Opening performance: what to lean into
Overall, some openings are performing particularly well for you, especially when you embrace sharp, tactical play. Consider prioritizing the following, while continuing to refine their main lines:
- Benoni Gambit (a sharp, tactical choice): highest win rate among your openings. If you enjoy aggressive play, continue refining this line and its common replies, but build a compact reference sheet for typical responses.
- French Defense: Advance Variation and French Defense: 50%+ win rate in your sample. These are solid, controllable choices that can keep you out of danger while you look for improving chances.
- Queen's Gambit Related lines (QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 and QGA: 3.e3 c5): solid choices with respectable results. Use them as reliable ‘second gears’ when your main line isn’t feeling right.
- Australian Defense and London System variations show competitive results but may require more precise move-order play. If you enjoy these, deepen your knowledge of typical traps and critical responses to avoid getting outplayed in the opening.
- Avoid or refine the lower-performing options (e.g., Amar Gambit, London System: Poisoned Pawn, and similar lines) unless you’re prepared with specific improvement plans for the typical middlegame themes that arise.
Rating trend and plan to keep improving
Your recent trend indicates positive momentum across multiple time horizons. To sustain and accelerate this growth, focus on structured, repeatable practice that translates quickly to bullet play.
- Build a concise daily routine focused on quick tactics, a short opening study, and a brief post-game review.
- Adopt a simple post-game checklist to reduce blunders and reinforce good decisions in time pressure.
- Match your openings to your comfort zone: pick two lines you’re confident with, and deepen them with 5-6 key replies to common responses.
- Regularly review your bullet games to identify recurring mistakes, then create targeted drills (e.g., “avoid back-rank weaknesses in rook endgames” or “spotting forced trades to simplify on move 15”).
Recommended practice plan (mobile-friendly)
- Daily: 10-15 minutes of tactical puzzles (focus on patterns that arise in quick games: forks, pins, skewers, and back-rank motifs).
- Weekly: two short opening study sessions (15-20 minutes each) on your two preferred lines, plus a quick reference cheat sheet of main replies.
- After each bullet game: write down the two biggest moment decisions and one alternative you could try next time.
- Time-management drill: in a practice game, aim to have a concrete plan by move 8 and verify its viability by move 12.
- Endgame focus: include 1-2 endgame practice sessions per week (rook endings and king-pawn endings are especially helpful in bullet).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| slowbughouseturtle | 44W / 47L / 0D | View |
| linhaocheng | 5W / 13L / 0D | View |
| mc-cavallo | 70W / 127L / 1D | View |
| kleopl | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| albarezin | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sofrilog | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| andrissakk2014 | 4W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sofiiaaa123 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| cobstar6000 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| noobdoozer | 41W / 31L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| iddd99 | 294W / 253L / 1D | View Games |
| triela | 288W / 235L / 4D | View Games |
| miliciapopular2 | 205W / 169L / 1D | View Games |
| AudioIsOn19 | 140W / 191L / 1D | View Games |
| RyanTime | 157W / 154L / 6D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1681 | 1872 | ||
| 2024 | 1857 | 1633 | 1852 | 1872 |
| 2023 | 1642 | 1665 | 1852 | 1866 |
| 2022 | 1642 | 1546 | 1898 | 2081 |
| 2021 | 1487 | 1627 | 1777 | 2022 |
| 2020 | 1436 | 1799 | 1770 | |
| 2019 | 1471 | 1768 | ||
| 2018 | 1579 | 1770 | ||
| 2017 | 1508 | |||
| 2016 | 1565 | |||
| 2015 | 1332 | |||
| 2014 | 1366 | |||
| 2013 | 1251 | 1730 | ||
| 2012 | 1269 | 1620 | ||
| 2011 | 1509 | 1720 | ||
| 2010 | 1577 | |||
| 2009 | 1469 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7368W / 5932L / 67D | 7262W / 5894L / 86D | 0.1 |
| 2024 | 7266W / 5895L / 84D | 7306W / 6047L / 68D | 0.2 |
| 2023 | 4110W / 3454L / 41D | 4142W / 3436L / 34D | 0.2 |
| 2022 | 3226W / 2830L / 196D | 3252W / 2838L / 182D | 49.0 |
| 2021 | 2533W / 2227L / 194D | 2398W / 2379L / 212D | 70.6 |
| 2020 | 1903W / 1652L / 147D | 1833W / 1754L / 153D | 75.5 |
| 2019 | 2248W / 1970L / 162D | 2179W / 2053L / 178D | 73.4 |
| 2018 | 653W / 594L / 56D | 601W / 638L / 63D | 77.3 |
| 2017 | 649W / 638L / 48D | 629W / 636L / 66D | 75.0 |
| 2016 | 523W / 404L / 45D | 487W / 454L / 32D | 75.6 |
| 2015 | 254W / 271L / 29D | 300W / 235L / 32D | 72.3 |
| 2014 | 657W / 357L / 54D | 608W / 409L / 41D | 74.0 |
| 2013 | 417W / 251L / 20D | 417W / 239L / 22D | 69.3 |
| 2012 | 580W / 313L / 24D | 548W / 349L / 21D | 66.6 |
| 2011 | 9W / 5L / 0D | 11W / 0L / 1D | 69.3 |
| 2010 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 35.0 |
| 2009 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 52.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73188 | 40110 | 32682 | 396 | 54.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2095 | 1075 | 933 | 87 | 51.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1920 | 1055 | 788 | 77 | 55.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 951 | 491 | 416 | 44 | 51.6% |
| Philidor Defense | 824 | 455 | 332 | 37 | 55.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 794 | 396 | 357 | 41 | 49.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 733 | 404 | 306 | 23 | 55.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 704 | 388 | 284 | 32 | 55.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 685 | 343 | 301 | 41 | 50.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 614 | 311 | 283 | 20 | 50.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 2588 | 1309 | 1165 | 114 | 50.6% |
| French Defense | 2502 | 1266 | 1134 | 102 | 50.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1676 | 846 | 741 | 89 | 50.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 974 | 471 | 474 | 29 | 48.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 924 | 433 | 441 | 50 | 46.9% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 876 | 446 | 399 | 31 | 50.9% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 829 | 421 | 381 | 27 | 50.8% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 739 | 402 | 309 | 28 | 54.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 668 | 301 | 340 | 27 | 45.1% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 666 | 326 | 316 | 24 | 49.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 42 | 41 | 1 | 0 | 97.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Fianchetto Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 84 | 44 | 37 | 3 | 52.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 50 | 28 | 19 | 3 | 56.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 45 | 27 | 15 | 3 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 32 | 17 | 11 | 4 | 53.1% |
| Australian Defense | 28 | 19 | 8 | 1 | 67.9% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Modern | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Modern Defense | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Dutch Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 36 | 1 |
| Losing | 26 | 0 |