Sebas Sanchez (aka pifion)
International Master - FIDE Titled Player
Sebas Sanchez, widely known in the chess world as pifion, is an International Master who dances across the 64 squares with the grace of a grandmaster and the tenacity of a lion guarding its den. With a peak blitz rating soaring as high as 2731 in mid-2023, Sebas isn’t just your average chess enthusiast—they are the kind of player who makes pawns tremble and kings sweat.
A Journey Through Ratings
Beginning with modest blitz battles in 2012 at a rating around 1500, Sebas showed lightning-fast improvement, smashing their way to a blitz peak above 2700 by 2023. Bullet chess? Piece of cake. They cracked a blistering 2400 rating there. In rapid games, Sebas dazzled with a peak of 2647, proving speed is not their only weapon.
Playing Style & Strengths
Known for a remarkable 74.85% comeback rate and a win rate of nearly 67% even after losing a piece, Sebas thrives in chaotic, tactical positions. Their endgame frequency clocks in at almost 72%, reflecting a penchant for grinding down opponents in tight scrambles that would have less-hardened players nodding off. Despite an average of nearly 60 moves per win, which might sound like a marathon, their games never lack excitement or humor—because who said chess can't be both grueling and entertaining?
Legends of the Board & Notable Streaks
With a longest winning streak of 27 games, Sebas has proven they can turn on the afterburners when it matters most. Their impressive unbeatable streaks in blitz and bullet have made them a nightmare for opponents and a joy for spectators hoping to witness master-level sphere-walking.
Favorite Openings
Sebas keeps their cards under wraps with a "Top Secret" approach in openings, but judging by the stats, they wield it effectively across blitz, bullet, and rapid games. A win rate over 68% in blitz and more than 82% in bullet against all comers speaks volumes about their preparation and unpredictability.
Psychological & Tactical Edge
Blessed with a tilt factor of only 3, Sebas remains cool-headed under pressure, especially shining bright around 7 AM, when the rest of us are still wrestling with the snooze button. Notably, they are famous for turning the tables after setbacks—because giving up is so not in their vocabulary.
Recent Triumph
In April 2025, Sebas sealed a victory with a stylish resignation from their opponent, proving once again that even in modern chess, classic technique and nerves of steel reign supreme. The game featured the Caro-Kann Defense, where Sebas patiently outmaneuvered their adversary, leading to an elegant finish.
Summary
Sebas Sanchez, aka pifion, is a chess powerhouse: a tactician who crafts positional masterpieces, a fighter who fights through adversity, and a strategist who surprises at every turn. They remind us all that chess isn’t just a game, it’s a thrilling adventure where heroes are crowned and legends are born—preferably with a subtle smile and a cheeky move or two.
Hi sebas sanchez, here’s a quick performance review based on your latest blitz games!
What you’re already doing well ✅
- Dynamic play in the Caro-Kann & Modern set–ups. In your win vs Botal84 you steered the game into sharp pawn-storms and converted after 21…Qf6. Your feel for initiative is a real asset.
- Tactical alertness. Motifs such as 17.Nxd5! (same game) or 29.g6! against Tactican_228 show you spot “in between” blows quickly.
- Practical openings repertoire. You rarely leave the book worse. Against higher-rated opponents you use flexible systems (…c6/…d5 or …c5/…e6) that keep positions sound.
Biggest improvement levers 🔍
- Time management.
Five of your last six losses were on the clock, often in winning or equal endgames (e.g. vs prime-morty, Cayse). Your move-to-move pace drops in queen endings: from ~2 s per move in middlegame to 6-8 s in endgame while the opponent accelerates. - Endgame technique.
• In the English game you reached a rook + pawns ending a pawn up yet wandered into perpetual checks.
• vs prime-morty you hesitated with …Kd7–c7 allowing Rb6-checks; the critical plan was …Re7, …g5, …h5 to freeze king-side pawns first.
A bit of structured endgame study will convert many of those clock-scrambles into quick wins. - Handling of space disadvantages.
Losses in the Slav and Trompowsky feature you locking the position with …c6/…e6 then struggling for counter-play. When you cannot break with …c5/…e5 early, relocate pieces (…Ne4/…f5 ideas) instead of passive shuffling.
Action plan for the next two weeks 🗓️
- Switch to an incremental time-control (3 + 2) for 20 games. Force yourself to play endgames with the extra increment and monitor your average “time left” statistic. helps you see whether fatigue or specific hours create most flag-outs.
- Daily “7-7-7” endgame routine: 7 minutes on basic rook endings, 7 on queen endings, 7 on technical conversion (two bishops vs knight, etc.). 21 min/day → noticeable gain.
- Opening tweak vs 1.d4: add the immediate …c5 strike in the Slav move-order to avoid cramped positions. Blitz-test 10 games and review results in .
Concrete study bites 📚
- Re-play this critical segment and try to find quicker winning lines: (vs prime-morty).
- Memorise the Philidor drawing zone and the umbrella technique—both appeared in your loss to english_player_89.
- Add these thematic breaks to your “must-calculate” checklist:
– …f6/f5 pawn breaks in Caro structures
– …c5 vs the Exchange Slav
– g-pawn pushes when opposite-side castling
Quick stats snapshot
Peak blitz rating: 2731 (2023-06-16)
Current trend: +18 elo over last 20 games (despite 3 time losses!)
Keep the momentum going!
You already demonstrate IM-level tactical vision; ironing out the endgame/time-pressure phase will give you a free 50-100 elo. Enjoy the grind, and feel free to share any positions that puzzle you.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| diogenesofflorida | 10W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| lizcano-jair | 30W / 1L / 0D | |
| rubenchov | 17W / 3L / 0D | |
| asolidum-merciless | 13W / 3L / 0D | |
| chechini1 | 14W / 0L / 0D | |
| jamesrealmadrid | 11W / 2L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2656 | 1293 | ||
| 2024 | 2648 | 2400 | ||
| 2023 | 2278 | 2731 | 2647 | |
| 2022 | 2620 | 2400 | ||
| 2021 | 2590 | |||
| 2020 | 2400 | 2606 | 1852 | |
| 2019 | 2172 | |||
| 2018 | 2216 | 2092 | 800 | |
| 2013 | 1907 | 2081 | ||
| 2012 | 1899 | 2166 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 40W / 11L / 6D | 30W / 21L / 6D | 65.3 |
| 2024 | 6W / 4L / 0D | 4W / 2L / 3D | 99.5 |
| 2023 | 20W / 3L / 1D | 15W / 7L / 1D | 45.4 |
| 2022 | 18W / 10L / 4D | 14W / 15L / 5D | 77.6 |
| 2021 | 5W / 4L / 0D | 6W / 4L / 1D | 78.8 |
| 2020 | 33W / 7L / 5D | 30W / 4L / 5D | 71.5 |
| 2019 | 8W / 1L / 0D | 6W / 4L / 0D | 73.2 |
| 2018 | 15W / 3L / 1D | 18W / 2L / 0D | 49.5 |
| 2013 | 17W / 3L / 0D | 18W / 3L / 0D | 60.6 |
| 2012 | 26W / 0L / 0D | 22W / 4L / 0D | 60.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Old Steinitz Defense, Semi-Duras Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 90.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 23 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 73.9% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 42.9% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 72.7% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 20.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| French Defense | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 44.4% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 12 |
| Losing | 3 | 0 |