Pierre Laurent-Paoli, aka "Pilopa"
Grandmaster Extraordinaire and Blitz Virtuoso
Hailing from the hallowed halls of chess mastery, Pierre Laurent-Paoli has earned the prestigious Grandmaster title from FIDE, solidifying his place in the pantheon of chess legends. Known in the chess world by the enigmatic moniker "Pilopa," this player blends deep strategy with lightning-fast reflexes and a tactical mind sharp enough to slice through the toughest defenses.
Pilopa's love affair with blitz chess is nothing short of epic. Over thousands of games, he has amassed a staggering 4,043 wins against 2,954 losses and 668 draws in blitz alone, with an electric peak rating soaring to an astonishing 2890 as of December 2024. With a typical game averaging around 79 moves when victorious, Pilopa is not a one-move wonder; patience and endurance are key ingredients in his formula of success.
But don’t be fooled—while blitz is his playground, Pilopa has also dabbled deftly in bullet with a peak rating of 2715 and solid rapid performances. White pieces tend to favor him a bit more, giving Pilopa a juicy 55% win rate, while even with black, he's no pushover, securing victories in more than half of his battles.
Opening Repertoire Highlights
- Blitz Openings: Pilopa navigates complex openings like the Nimzowitsch Defense and the Benko Gambit with grace, boasting win rates over 55% in these lines. His Kings Indian Defense Orthodox stands out with a remarkable 63.64% win rate—clearly a secret weapon.
- Bullet Favorites: The Pirc Defense is Pilopa’s playground here, where he triumphs nearly 78% of the time. And if you dare face his Slav Defense Modern Triangle System, prepare to be shut out—zero losses in six games!
- Rapid and Daily: While less frequent, his sharp precision in rapid and daily formats includes a flawless 100% record in several niche openings, proving he's no one-trick pony.
Psychological Edge & Style
Pilopa is famously patient—not only does he average over 79 moves per win, but his endgames are a particular forte, appearing in over 85% of his matches. Known for spectacular comebacks, he has an 87% comeback rate that would make a Hollywood scriptwriter jealous. However, even the best have their off days: his tilt factor suggests he occasionally gets a bit emotional, especially after losses.
He tends to shine in the early hours around 1 AM (perfect for night owls and insomniacs alike), with a win rate reaching 60% at this ghostly hour. But beware: his worst time to play seems to hover around late night or early morning hours when focus is most elusive.
Recent Battles
In a recent thrilling encounter on June 1, 2025, Pilopa triumphed over BSWPaulsen using the classy Caro-Kann Defense, wrapping up victory in 17 moves with a resignation from his opponent. Just one day prior, the Grandmaster outmaneuvered none other than Nigel Short in the Ruy Lopez, proving Pilopa’s mettle against heavyweights.
But as every chess saga goes, Pilopa sometimes meets his match. On June 3, 2025, he suffered a hard-fought defeat by FaustinoOro in a Sicilian Defense Canal Attack, a testament that even Grandmasters have battles that slip through their tactical fingers.
Fun Fact
Despite a fierce competitive streak, Pilopa has mastered the art of the "gentle resignation" after winning nearly 2,607 games this way—because every great champion knows when to pinch and when to let go.
Whether blitzing through the ranks or strategizing deep in endgames, Pierre Laurent-Paoli remains a formidable force to reckon with—proof that chess is both an art and a thrilling rollercoaster ride.
What you did well
You showed good tactical awareness in your recent win, finishing with a clean combination that exploited coordination between your queen and pieces. This shows you can spot forcing ideas and convert pressure to a concrete result when the position becomes sharp.
Your opening flexibility is a strength. You’ve demonstrated comfort in several solid, yet active setups, and you’re able to adapt based on Black’s responses. This helps you avoid predictable paths and keeps your opponents guessing early in the game.
You stay resilient in complex middlegame and endgame situations. Even in tougher lines, you manage to keep the fight alive and look for practical chances, which is especially valuable in blitz where time pressure makes precise play harder.
Areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: practice making quick, solid decisions in the first 15–20 moves and reserve some clock for the critical moments. A restless clock often leads to small blunders in the middlegame or endgame.
- Pattern recognition in the middlegame: strengthen quick assessment of typical pawn structures and piece trades that arise from your chosen openings. This helps you avoid unnecessary exchanges and keeps your pieces active.
- Endgame conversion: in longer sequences, focus on converting benefits (such as a better pawn structure or active king) into a clear plan to win or hold. Work on simple rook and minor-piece endings to finish cleanly.
- Blunder prevention in tactical scenes: after a forcing line, pause briefly to check for missed tactical resources from your opponent. A two-step check (what if they have this? what if they have that?) can prevent surprises.
Opening and middlegame plan
Your openings show you’re comfortable with aggressive, dynamic structures as well as solid, flexible setups. Given the data on performance in several main lines, consider adopting a focused, small repertoire to deepen your understanding and reduce decision fatigue in blitz. A practical approach could be:
- Keep two primary openings you’re confident with in the white side, one sharp and one solid, to handle different Black responses.
- Choose one dynamic defense as Black (for example, a line in the Benko family or another aggressive system) and one solid, steady defense (such as a controlled Queen's Pawn or Caro-Kann-leaning setup).
- Study common middlegame plans and typical piece maneuvers that arise from those two openings, so you recognize patterns quickly during a game.
Review a couple of recent games to extract specific middlegame plans and common tactical motifs you faced, and note which ideas worked best for you and which didn’t.
Endgame awareness and conversion
Several games show extended fights where the endgame technique matters. Add short, focused endgame drills into your routine, such as:
- King activity in rook endings and simple queen vs rook endings.
- Practical rook endgames with pawns on one side, practicing how to create passed pawns and convert advantage.
- Minor piece endings basics, including when to trade to simplify and how to keep pressure with your remaining pieces.
Two-week practical training plan
- Daily tactical focus (15–20 minutes): solve puzzles that emphasize pattern recognition, forcing lines, and calculation accuracy. Include 3–5 mating/netting puzzles per week.
- Opening study (3 sessions/week, 25–30 minutes): deepen your two primary White openings with 5-6 representative Black replies each, focusing on the main middlegame ideas and typical plans.
- Endgame practice (2 sessions/week, 20–25 minutes): rook endings, simple king-and-pawn endings, and basic queen vs rook scenarios to improve conversion.
- Game review habit: after each blitz session, spend 10–15 minutes annotating one win and one loss, noting where you spent time, where you found strong ideas, and where you could have improved calculation or stability.
Next steps
If you want, I can review a specific recent game to point out exact moments where you could have chosen a stronger plan, and tailor the opening and endgame drills to match the positions you encounter most often. Would you like me to focus on a couple of your upcoming targets (for example, reinforcing a particular White opening or a defensive Black setup) and outline a targeted practice plan?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jose Miguel Fernandez Garcia | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Ian Dzhumagaliev | 3W / 1L / 0D | |
| Borna Franc | 2W / 2L / 2D | |
| ixcii | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Lion-993 | 1W / 3L / 1D | |
| martinhollan | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Aron Pasti | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| stellarchess | 4W / 4L / 0D | |
| supermanaa | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| 123king456 | 3W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vladimir Bilic | 27W / 12L / 4D | |
| Necmettin KORKMAZ | 20W / 15L / 4D | |
| Roman Zhenetl | 17W / 18L / 2D | |
| Tamaz Mgeladze | 22W / 7L / 5D | |
| spitsyn-aleksei | 17W / 16L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2651 | 2823 | 2000 | |
| 2024 | 1500 | 2838 | ||
| 2023 | 2692 | 2757 | ||
| 2022 | 2532 | 2659 | ||
| 2021 | 2447 | 2551 | ||
| 2020 | 2449 | 2100 | ||
| 2019 | 2242 | 2508 | 2100 | 1875 |
| 2018 | 2146 | 2351 | 2126 | |
| 2017 | 2229 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 308W / 210L / 48D | 284W / 223L / 55D | 86.5 |
| 2024 | 367W / 237L / 72D | 354W / 250L / 73D | 88.4 |
| 2023 | 289W / 162L / 54D | 250W / 190L / 61D | 93.5 |
| 2022 | 97W / 65L / 15D | 95W / 67L / 14D | 92.7 |
| 2021 | 353W / 241L / 38D | 332W / 261L / 44D | 90.1 |
| 2020 | 191W / 114L / 27D | 177W / 144L / 29D | 85.5 |
| 2019 | 427W / 302L / 60D | 396W / 323L / 63D | 85.7 |
| 2018 | 239W / 151L / 35D | 204W / 191L / 37D | 86.6 |
| 2017 | 35W / 14L / 0D | 23W / 20L / 3D | 83.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 463 | 241 | 183 | 39 | 52.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 449 | 248 | 166 | 35 | 55.2% |
| Döry Defense | 291 | 158 | 101 | 32 | 54.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 281 | 151 | 107 | 23 | 53.7% |
| Australian Defense | 265 | 142 | 102 | 21 | 53.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 168 | 88 | 66 | 14 | 52.4% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 164 | 91 | 56 | 17 | 55.5% |
| Benko Gambit | 163 | 76 | 72 | 15 | 46.6% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 150 | 78 | 52 | 20 | 52.0% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 148 | 76 | 55 | 17 | 51.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 63.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% |
| Döry Defense | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD Tarrasch: 7.Bg2 Be7 8.O-O | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Czech Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 23 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 3 |