Profile: pluto-hendrixx
Meet pluto-hendrixx, a chess player who approaches the 64 squares much like a biologist approaches a petri dish—curious, occasionally unpredictable, but always full of life and drama. Slowly evolving through the rapid lanes with a rating that reached a max of 630 in 2025 before settling near 311, pluto-hendrixx has embarked on a fascinating evolutionary journey filled with wins, losses, and a few draws—a true specimen in the wild ecosystem of online chess.
Known for a Top Secret opening repertoire (much like certain undiscovered species), pluto-hendrixx’s rapid win rate hovers around 35%, while blitz efforts yield nearly a 44% strike rate—proving that when the heat is on, the reflexes are as sharp as a fresh set of claws. This player’s longest winning streak stretches to 4 games, a short but mighty chain of victories in the survival-of-the-fittest arena.
With a comeback rate of 62%, it’s clear that like a resilient amoeba, pluto-hendrixx refuses to stay down, even managing a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece. This tactical resilience should make opponents wary—underestimate this reptilian chess tactician, and you might find yourself engulfed in an unexpected endgame symbiosis.
When it comes to psychological factors, the tilt factor is a low 8, suggesting that pluto-hendrixx maintains a stable mental ecosystem, resilient to the venom of frustration. Rated vs casual games reveal a significant 36% boost in performance, showing that under pressure, this player's instincts kick into high gear—a true apex predator of the virtual chessboard.
Whether prowling in the shadows of the night playing blitz around 9–11 PM with solid win rates or pouncing during the oddly specific 20:00 hour with a perfect score, pluto-hendrixx’s play style is a living, breathing organism—sometimes wild, sometimes surprisingly methodical, but always full of evolutionary surprises.
In conclusion, pluto-hendrixx is less a chess player and more a fascinating creature of the game’s ecosystem—an enigma wrapped in a riddle, camouflaged with “Top Secret” openings, whose resilience and adaptability make every match a unique biological experiment.
Quick recap of the recent games
Nice work — you converted active play into wins and also showed some risky, sharp choices that cost you in other games. I reviewed your recent win as Black (vs ufxutditd) — you used piece activity and a passed pawn to finish the game — and the loss vs ciociomericias where a quick capture left your king exposed and led to a mating net.
- Opening shown: Sicilian Defense (you handled the middlegame dynamically)
- Typical problems to watch: tactical oversights when grabbing material, and back‑rank/king safety issues
Replay the most recent win (orientation: black) to review how you created the passed pawn and activated rooks:
What you are doing well
- Active piece play: you consistently bring rooks and bishops into the game and punish passive opponents.
- Converting advantages: in wins you turn small advantages (advanced pawns, active rook) into decisive results.
- Opening variety: you have many lines at your disposal and score well in several (for example, your Petrov and Amazon Attack results are strong).
- Tactical sense: you find concrete wins and mates when the position is sharp — that’s a real asset.
Key areas to improve (actionable)
- Check for opponent threats before grabbing material — ask “What does my opponent threaten after my capture?” (loss by Qxg2# is a classic example of grabbing and missing the mate).
- Back‑rank awareness — when your king stays on the back rank, make luft or keep a pawn/knight lookout before committing to tactical captures.
- Defensive coordination — when under pressure from rooks and passed pawns, prioritize active defense (rook activity, king steps to safe squares) rather than passive waiting.
- Calculate forcing continuations more reliably — in sharp positions take an extra 5–10 seconds to verify the opponent’s intermezzo moves (checks, captures, threats).
Concrete study plan (weekly)
- Daily (15–25 minutes): 10 tactics from mixed themes, but emphasize back‑rank mates, discovered checks and mating nets.
- Twice weekly (30–45 minutes): endgame practice — rook + passed pawn, basic rook endgames, and simple king + pawn races. Drill Lucena and Philidor ideas.
- Once weekly (30–60 minutes): review 3 of your recent losses — replay each without engine first, write down candidate moves, then check with engine to see the gap in calculation.
- Opening work (2×30 min/week): focus on one opening at a time (start with your most-played: Sicilian Defense). Learn typical pawn breaks and one tactical motif per line.
Pre-game checklist (carry with you)
- King safety: is my back rank covered? Can I create luft or a guard piece?
- Loose pieces: am I leaving any piece en prise or undefended after a capture?
- Opponent threats: what threats does my opponent have now (checks, forks, captures)?
- Last move check: re-evaluate the opponent’s last move — did it create a new tactic I missed?
Small habits that yield big gains
- Before each capture ask: “Does any opponent piece gain a tempo or check after this?”
- When ahead, trade to reduce opponent counterplay — exchange when it simplifies your task instead of getting fancy.
- Spend the first 10–20 seconds of each game on a rough opening plan — this avoids early drift and bad pawn moves.
Suggested next steps
- Run a focused session on mating nets and back‑rank patterns (one session this week).
- Use the study plan for 4 weeks and track blunders per game — aim to reduce blunders steadily.
- Keep analyzing your decisive losses with the “guess the move” method before opening an engine.
If you want, I can create a 4‑week personalized schedule based on the openings you play and give targeted exercises (tactics + endgames + 1 opening per week). Also tell me which game you’d like a deeper post‑mortem on and I’ll break it down move‑by‑move.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ufxutditd | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ciociomericias | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| physco0728 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sherozefarooqui | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| fadiomari1978 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nutribunn | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| filmonn45 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| yuvi_sharma44 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| severusken | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| twin3333 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| francescopalmerini | 4W / 9L / 1D | View Games |
| lucaanto07 | 0W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
| kingdelcontract | 1W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| frijolhervido | 1W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| navya240 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 131 | 192 | 285 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 123W / 154L / 7D | 129W / 141L / 16D | 50.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 50 | 22 | 25 | 3 | 44.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 35 | 14 | 18 | 3 | 40.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 24 | 10 | 13 | 1 | 41.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 23 | 10 | 11 | 2 | 43.5% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 20 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 45.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 17 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 47.1% |
| Petrov's Defense | 17 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 52.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 17 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 52.9% |
| Australian Defense | 16 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 16 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 10 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Elephant Gambit | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Three Knights Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 8 | 1 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |