About PotapovaM
Well-versed in multiple chess formats, PotapovaM has seen success across Daily, Blitz, Bullet, and Rapid games. From a noteworthy Daily high of nearly 1950 in early competitive years to remarkable Blitz peaks exceeding 2600, their ability to adapt to changing board conditions is clear. The player’s steadiest climbs have emerged in high-paced formats, with a formidable Bullet peak rating around 2747 and a flair for dynamic attacks in Rapid, once touching 2504.
Known for lengthy, hard-fought encounters, PotapovaM’s average victories often stretch beyond 80 moves, underscoring strong endgame skills. An impressively low early-resignation rate suggests resilience, while they demonstrate a high comeback rate when material deficits occur. They’ve enjoyed a slightly stronger performance with White pieces, yet continue to pose significant threats as Black, reflecting a balanced, creative approach to opening preparation.
Over the years, PotapovaM has embraced a wide range of openings—illustrating flexibility and a keen willingness to experiment. Regular forays into the Sicilian and Nimzo-Indian are common in Blitz, while their Bullet repertoire includes a willingness to launch quick attacks at a moment’s notice. With a style characterized by depth in the endgame and a “never-say-die” attitude, PotapovaM remains an exciting, ever-evolving presence in the chess community.
Coaching Feedback for Margarita Potapova
Dear Margarita,
Your recent games show a solid understanding of opening theory and principled middlegame play. You've demonstrated excellent tactical awareness, as seen in your sharp attacks and sacrifices to open lines against your opponents. Here are some key observations and suggestions to help further improve your play:
Strengths
- Opening Preparation: You consistently choose strong, classical openings such as the Queen's Gambit, King's Indian, and Dutch Defense, and you handle typical ideas well, gaining good positions out of the opening.
- Tactical Vision: You spot opportunities for tactical strikes, for example the sacrifice on Ne4 and active queen and bishop maneuvers that led to attacking chances and eventual conversions.
- Endgame Technique: In won games, you show good technique in consolidating advantages and converting material or positional superiority.
- Time Management: You generally manage your clock well and maintain a healthy balance between thinking time and remaining time — keeping enough time for critical moments.
Areas for Improvement
- Defensive Resourcefulness: In your losses against strong opposition, opponents sometimes outmaneuver you in complex positions, particularly in the late middlegame transitioning to endgame. Review those games focusing on defensive ideas, prophylaxis, and counterattacks.
- Positional Planning: While your tactical play is strong, try to deepen your strategic planning in quieter positions. For example, consider pawn structure weaknesses or long-term piece placement more thoroughly to restrict the opponent's counterplay.
- Calculations under Pressure: Some mistakes occur in critical, sharp positions when the clock is low. Practicing calculation techniques and visualization drills could help reduce errors in these moments.
- Explore Alternative Plan Variations: Against some setups, consider trying slightly different plans or piece placements, especially when facing well-prepared opponents to surprise them and avoid routine positions.
Practical Recommendations
- Review your losses in detail, especially the late middlegame and endgame phases. Identify turning points where alternative moves could have kept the balance or improved your chances.
- Practice solving complex tactical puzzles regularly, including some endgame tactics to improve your calculation depth.
- Work on opening repertoires by analyzing thematic pawn breaks, typical maneuvers, and key positional ideas to guide your middlegame play more confidently.
- Play training sessions with a slow time control to improve your long-term planning and deepen your positional understanding.
- Annotate your own games with comments about your thought process; this will help you internalize lessons and recognize patterns faster.
Your level around 2700+ Elo shows you are a very strong player, and with some targeted work on the outlined areas, you can continue climbing toward your goals and maintaining consistent competitive results.
Keep up the excellent work, and never hesitate to ask for input on specific openings, endgames, or tactical motifs!
Best wishes on your chess journey!
Your Coach
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| billfroster | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| purpurice | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| mnedev | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Zuhao Luke Li | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| NooMerccyy | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| imaster20 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| puffycat | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Karina Ambartsumova | 2W / 5L / 0D | View |
| Patryk Cieslak | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Alexandros Papasimakopoulos | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| nissou-ach | 163W / 125L / 56D | View Games |
| Marat Denishev | 101W / 212L / 25D | View Games |
| Lagmantr | 44W / 86L / 23D | View Games |
| lexa96 | 35W / 38L / 9D | View Games |
| fandorin2005 | 55W / 17L / 7D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2623 | 2668 | ||
| 2024 | 2585 | 2622 | 1681 | |
| 2023 | 2574 | 1375 | 1803 | |
| 2022 | 2651 | 2520 | ||
| 2021 | 2513 | 2562 | ||
| 2020 | 2446 | 2526 | 2135 | |
| 2019 | 2280 | 2533 | 2504 | 1735 |
| 2018 | 2156 | 2496 | 1951 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 107W / 83L / 17D | 95W / 99L / 15D | 67.1 |
| 2024 | 32W / 36L / 9D | 37W / 44L / 6D | 88.0 |
| 2023 | 98W / 95L / 9D | 82W / 109L / 14D | 73.4 |
| 2022 | 144W / 101L / 25D | 102W / 132L / 28D | 93.2 |
| 2021 | 471W / 403L / 94D | 436W / 435L / 102D | 91.2 |
| 2020 | 514W / 398L / 155D | 433W / 495L / 133D | 90.5 |
| 2019 | 423W / 372L / 93D | 391W / 418L / 86D | 82.7 |
| 2018 | 116W / 79L / 22D | 121W / 84L / 19D | 80.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 381 | 176 | 168 | 37 | 46.2% |
| Unknown | 260 | 144 | 114 | 2 | 55.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 198 | 85 | 92 | 21 | 42.9% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 175 | 86 | 66 | 23 | 49.1% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 153 | 64 | 71 | 18 | 41.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 151 | 63 | 68 | 20 | 41.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 149 | 61 | 70 | 18 | 40.9% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 142 | 62 | 68 | 12 | 43.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 126 | 57 | 58 | 11 | 45.2% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 126 | 52 | 60 | 14 | 41.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Catalan Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Benko Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 118 | 56 | 47 | 15 | 47.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 69 | 28 | 35 | 6 | 40.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 63 | 25 | 33 | 5 | 39.7% |
| Modern | 60 | 31 | 26 | 3 | 51.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 57 | 22 | 32 | 3 | 38.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 56 | 28 | 27 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 55 | 18 | 35 | 2 | 32.7% |
| King's Indian Attack | 51 | 25 | 21 | 5 | 49.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 49 | 14 | 31 | 4 | 28.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 45 | 25 | 19 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD Tarrasch: 6.g3 cxd4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 32 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |