Charli Péloquin

Overview and what stands out

You’ve shared a data-rich view of your rapid games. Here are some practical takeaways to guide your next steps:

• Short- to mid-term results show a mixed picture. One-month rating change is small, three-month change is modest, and six-month change is negative. This suggests you’re not in a steady winning rhythm yet, but there’s potential to turn things around with targeted tweaks.
• The strength-adjusted win rate sits around 0.445, which is below 50%. This indicates room to improve how you convert pressure into wins and avoid missed opportunities in several games.
• Your opening performance has some clear strengths. In particular, the Amar Gambit shows a high win rate, suggesting you handle sharp, dynamic positions well when you’re prepared for them. Other openings also show varied results, so a focused, consistent opening plan could help you maintain initiative more reliably.
• Patterns across the data hint at the need to shore up middlegame planning and endgame conversion, so you can carry advantages more consistently into the finish.

Strengths you can build on

• Comfort with aggressive, tactical play: The Amar Gambit results suggest you thrive in sharp, initiative-rich games when you’re prepared for the complexities.
• Resilience in complicated positions: You don’t shy away from dynamic imbalances, which can create practical chances even from tough openings.
• Opening flexibility: You already blend several defenses and structures, which gives you the ability to adapt to different opponents and styles.

Areas to improve

• Middlegame planning and conversion: Work on turning early pressure into tangible advantages and avoiding drawn-out positions where the opponent can equalize or flip the initiative.
• Endgame technique: Improve rook-and-pawn endgames and simplified endings so you can convert small advantages into wins more reliably.
• Time management: Some fluctuations in rating and trend data suggest you could benefit from a steadier pace, especially in longer rapid games. Practice allocating a clear thinking plan for the first 15 moves and stick to it.
• Strategic consistency with openings: While Amar Gambit is a strength, relying too heavily on sharp lines can backfire if opponents know solid defenses. Pair your dynamic choices with a solid, complementary, non-gambit option for balance.

Targeted practice plan

• Daily tactical puzzles: 15–20 minutes focusing on forks, pins, discovered attacks, and endgame surprises. This builds quicker recognition of forcing sequences.
• Post-game reviews: After every game, briefly annotate what worked and what didn’t. If you can, review with a coach or a strong player to spot recurring mistakes.
• Endgame drills: Practice rook endings, king activity, and simple pawn endgames using short, practical scenarios until you’re comfortable converting small advantages.
• Opening refinement: Dedicate 2–3 solid openings for White and Black (one aggressive option and one solid, quieter option). Learn the typical middle-game plans for each and review a recent game in those lines to see how plans unfold in practice.

Opening repertoire guidance

Your data shows Amar Gambit as a strong performer, but diversify with reliable, less risky choices to reduce volatility. Suggested approach:

• Maintain Amar Gambit as a corner toolkit for days when you’re feeling sharp and confident, but pair it with a solid, non-gambit reply to balance risk in other games.
• For Black, consider consolidating two solid defenses (for example, a Caro-Kann or a Scandinavian approach) to improve structure and reduce early tactical surprises.
• Study common plans and piece activity in your chosen openings so you can recognize typical middlegame themes quickly and respond with purposeful moves rather than reactive sequences.

Next steps and support

If you’d like, I can walk through a couple of your recent PGN games in detail to identify specific patterns and mistakes. Sharing a few representative games, especially from recent losses, will let me tailor a plan with concrete move-by-move improvements.

Would you like a focused, game-by-game review for the next message? I can annotate key turning points, suggested improvements, and a short drill plan based on those positions.